ice_dpll_is...hase_monitor(9)

📦 version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

💖 ice_dpll_is_pps_phase_monitor(9) 💖

okay so bestie, welcome to the Kernel API Manual 🌸 — yes that's the manual name, and yes we're gonna get through this together. this one's a little function with a big job: ice_dpll_is_pps_phase_monitor. it's giving "am i allowed to do the thing" energy and honestly? iconic. 🎀

✨ NAME ✨

ice_dpll_is_pps_phase_monitor — the vibe check that asks: is this dpll even capable of phase offset monitor? 🔍

🦋 SYNOPSIS 🦋

bool ice_dpll_is_pps_phase_monitor (struct ice_pf *pf );

🌟 ARGUMENTS 🌟

  • pf — pf private structure 🫶 (that's the whole argument, no notes, slay)

💅 DESCRIPTION 💅

so what it actually does, no cap: it checks whether the firmware is capable of supporting the admin command that provides phase offset monitoring on all the input pins on the PPS dpll. ✨

like, it's not doing the monitoring, bestie — it's just asking the firmware "hey, can u even?" 👑 and reporting back.

🔥 RETURN 🔥

  • true — PPS dpll phase offset monitoring is supported 🎉
  • false — PPS dpll phase offset monitoring is not supported 😭

🌈 SEE ALSO 🌈

Kernel file ./drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_dpll.c, plus enum ice_dpll_pin_type(9), and honestly the whole friend group 🫶 — every single one of these:

and that's the whole page, bestie 💜 no cap, you ate it.

this cutie lives over at ./drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice, dated October 2026 — go say hi to the kernel source sometime 🌸🦋✨

📦 where this page comes from