dm_test_nv_g..._clocks_fail(9)

📦 version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

✨ dm_test_nv_get_max_sustainable_clocks_fail(9) ✨

okay so bestie, welcome to the Kernel API Manual 💅 you're looking at dm_test_nv_g..._clocks_fail(9) — yeah the title got truncated, she's dramatic like that — but the real full name is right down there in NAME, no cap.

🌸 NAME 🌸

dm_test_nv_get_max_sustainable_clocks_fail — Test generic error 🫶

like, that's literally her whole job. she tests a generic error. iconic behavior honestly.

🎀 SYNOPSIS 🎀

void dm_test_nv_get_max_sustainable_clocks_fail (struct kunit *test );

yes that's the whole signature, she's a void, she gives nothing back, she just does the thing 💅

🦋 ARGUMENTS 🦋

  • test — the KUnit test context ✨ that's your lil test-world-in-a-box, everything she needs to know about the test run lives in there.

💖 DESCRIPTION 💖

okay so the vibe check here is simple and honestly kind of slay: this test verifies that pp_nv_get_maximum_sustainable_clocks returns PP_SMU_RESULT_FAIL. that's it. that's the whole plot. she's making sure the failure path actually fails the way it's supposed to, and if it doesn't? 💀 test's cooked.

periodt. 🔥

👑 SEE ALSO 👑

bestie there are SO many siblings in this family, buckle up 🍓 — and also peep the kernel file she lives in:

  • Kernel file ./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/tests/amdgpu_dm_pp_smu_test.c

the whole extended friend group, in order, no gatekeeping:

that's the whole group chat, everybody accounted for 🧚💜

well bestie, that's the page 💖 source is ./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/... and the date on this bad girl is October 2026, still calling herself dm_test_nv_g..._clocks_fail(9) at the bottom because she refuses to change her display name 😭 slay, honestly. go forth and fail gracefully 🤍✨

📦 where this page comes from