dm_test_rn_...k_table_fail(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… NAME

Okay so bestie, welcome to the Kernel API Manual (section 9, periodt) β€” this page is dm_test_rn_...k_table_fail(9) up in the header, and its actual full name is dm_test_rn_get_dpm_clock_table_fail: the test that checks generic error mapping. It's giving very specific, very focused, very "one job and she does it" energy. πŸŽ€


✨ SYNOPSIS

void dm_test_rn_get_dpm_clock_table_fail (struct kunit *test );

🫢 ARGUMENTS

  • test β€” the KUnit test context. That's it, that's the whole arg list, and honestly? Iconic of her. πŸ’…

πŸ”₯ DESCRIPTION

So here's the vibe: this test verifies that pp_rn_get_dpm_clock_table returns PP_SMU_RESULT_FAIL. That's the entire character arc. No cap β€” a fail case getting its own fail-check, which is exactly the kind of self-aware energy we stan. The way that error path gets tested too? Obsessed. πŸ’–


🌈 SEE ALSO

Kernel file

./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/tests/amdgpu_dm_pp_smu_test.c

And the whole ✨friend group✨ of related pages, all listed right here, no gatekeeping:


πŸ¦‹ That's the whole page bestie β€” go read the source file if you want the deep lore, ./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/tests/amdgpu_dm_pp_smu_test.c has it all iykyk.

Sign-off time ✨: this lil page comes from the ./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/... source, dated October 2026, and it lives under dm_test_rn_...k_table_fail(9) in the Kernel API Manual. Mwah πŸ’‹ β€” now go write some passing tests, main character. πŸ‘‘

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from