dm_test_pp_..._caps_at_max(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

✨ NAME ✨

Bestie, say hi to dm_test_pp_to_dc_clock_levels_latency_caps_at_max β€” Test count capping. This page is filed under the Kernel API Manual, and yes, the function name is a whole entire paragraph by itself. Iconic behavior, honestly. πŸ’…


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

void dm_test_pp_to_dc_clock_levels_latency_caps_at_max (struct kunit
       *test );

πŸŽ€ ARGUMENTS πŸŽ€

  • test β€” the KUnit test context. That's the whole cast list, and honestly? Main character energy. ✨

πŸ’… DESCRIPTION πŸ’…

Okay so the vibe check here is simple: verify that pp_to_dc_clock_levels_with_latency caps num_levels at DM_PP_MAX_CLOCK_LEVELS when the input exceeds the maximum. That's literally the test. It's giving "boundary check but make it fashion." πŸ¦‹

No extra lore, no side quests β€” just confirming the cap does its little job fr fr. 🌸


πŸ”₯ SEE ALSO πŸ”₯

Kernel file: ./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/tests/amdgpu_dm_pp_smu_test.c

The whole test squad pull up here, so let's give them their moment:


Cute little sign-off bestie: source/version is ./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/..., dated October 2026, and the page is dm_test_pp_..._caps_at_max(9). Bye babes, go cap those levels πŸ’–βœ¨

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from