dm_test_nv_..._unsupported(9)

📦 version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

💅 dm_test_nv_..._unsupported(9) ✨

okay so bestie, welcome to the Kernel API Manual entry for dm_test_nv_..._unsupported(9) — yes that's the truncated little nickname, the real full name is down in NAME and it's a whole mouthful, we love that for her 🎀

🌸 NAME 🌸

dm_test_nv_set_hard_min_dcefclk_unsupported — the one that tests the EOPNOTSUPP mapping, no cap 💅

🦋 SYNOPSIS 🦋

void dm_test_nv_set_hard_min_dcefclk_unsupported (struct kunit *test );

✨ ARGUMENTS ✨

  • test — the KUnit test context 🧚 that's it, that's the whole argument, she's lowkey low-maintenance

🔥 DESCRIPTION 🔥

Okay so here's the vibe: this test literally just verifies that pp_nv_set_hard_min_dcefclk_by_freq returns PP_SMU_RESULT_UNSUPPORTED. That's the whole assignment. It's giving "one job, does it flawlessly" 👑

fr fr, that's it — the function should come back with that unsupported result and the test is like "yep, correct, iconic behavior, we stan" ⭐

ngl there is genuinely nothing else in here, this is a tiny little test and we respect her for knowing exactly what she is 🫶

👑 SEE ALSO 👑

Kernel file — she lives right here, come visit:

./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/tests/amdgpu_dm_pp_smu_test.c

and here's the whole friend group, the entire crew, every single one, in order, so nobody feels left out 💖:

and that's the whole page, bestie 🌈✨ before you go — the fine print at the bottom was giving source-and-version energy: it came from ./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/... and it's dated October 2026, so like… future icon behavior honestly 💀🦋 slay, go run your tests, mwah 🫶💖

📦 where this page comes from