dm_test_app...dpm_disabled(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… dm_test_apply_display_requirements_dpm_disabled β€” Kernel API Manual ✨

okay so bestie, buckle up, we're in the Kernel API Manual today and this one's a little cutie. The page you're reading is dm_test_app...dpm_disabled(9) (yes the header truncates it, no we're not mad about it πŸ’–).


✨ NAME ✨

dm_test_apply_display_requirements_dpm_disabled β€” literally just the test for the DPM-disabled path πŸŽ€


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

void dm_test_apply_display_requirements_dpm_disabled (struct kunit *test);

πŸ¦‹ ARGUMENTS πŸ¦‹

  • test β€” the KUnit test context, aka the vibes-holder for this test run 🫢

πŸ’… DESCRIPTION πŸ’…

So here's the whole point of this icon: we're verifying that dm_pp_apply_display_requirements returns true without touching the display configuration at all β€” that's the whole thing β€” and it only behaves that way when DPM is disabled. No cap. Not me double-checking that it doesn't sneak a single change in there 😭πŸ”₯


πŸ‘‘ SEE ALSO πŸ‘‘

Kernel file β€” ./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/tests/amdgpu_dm_pp_smu_test.c (go read the source, iykyk πŸ’œ)

and the whole friend group, fr fr:


okay that's the whole page, and with zero skips because we don't do that here πŸ’…βœ¨

byeee bestie 🫢 β€” this lil page is from the Kernel API Manual, source ./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/..., dated October 2026, and it's filed under dm_test_app...dpm_disabled(9) if you need to find it again πŸŽ€πŸ’–

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from