pvr_page_table_l1_remove(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… pvr_page_table_l1_remove(9) β€” from the Kernel API Manual πŸŽ€

okay bestie, sit down, we're doing page table surgery today and honestly? it's giving cleanup era ✨


🌸 NAME 🌸

pvr_page_table_l1_remove β€” Remove a level 0 page table from a level 1 page table.

(no because why is the name l1 and the description says level 0, iykyk, we don't question the lore πŸ’€ β€” just copy it exactly, that's the vibe)


✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

void pvr_page_table_l1_remove (struct pvr_mmu_op_context *op_ctx );

one function, one argument, zero drama 🫢


πŸ¦‹ ARGUMENTS πŸ¦‹

  • op_ctx β€” the target MMU op context, and it's literally pointing at the L1 entry we're about to remove πŸ‘‘ that's its whole job.

πŸ’– DESCRIPTION πŸ’–

so here's the tea πŸ“ β€” if this function results in the L1 table becoming empty, it gets removed from its parent level 2 page table and destroyed. like, gone gone. it truly said "my work here is done" and exited the chat 😭πŸ”₯

⚠️ and now the serious part, bestie, no cap: it is the caller's responsibility to make sure op_ctx.curr_page points to a valid L1 entry. not the function's problem, yours. check it before you wreck it, fr fr πŸ’…

🌈 SEE ALSO 🌈

the whole extended friend group, we love a linked list of lore πŸ‘‘


and that's the whole page, bestie πŸ§šπŸ’œ this one's living in ./drivers/gpu/drm/imagination, dated October 2026 β€” iconic of her honestly, ate and left no crumbs πŸŒŸπŸ’…

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from