dce8_average..._for_display(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… dce8_average_bandwidth_vs_dram_bandwidth_for_display(9) β€” Kernel API Manual energy ✨

okay bestie, welcome to the kernel API manual for dce8_average_bandwidth_vs_dram_bandwidth_for_display(9) 🫢 β€” yes that name is a whole paragraph, no we are not changing it, it's iconic and we respect it πŸ’–


🌸 NAME 🌸

dce8_average_bandwidth_vs_dram_bandwidth_for_display β€” the lil check-in that asks "does the average bandwidth fit?" and also peeks at the available dram bandwidth πŸ‘€


✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

bool dce8_average_bandwidth_vs_dram_bandwidth_for_display (struct
dce8_wm_params *wm );

πŸŽ€ ARGUMENTS πŸŽ€

  • wm β€” the watermark calculation data 🫧 like, all the numbers it needs to do the math, gathered up in one struct

πŸ¦‹ DESCRIPTION πŸ¦‹

So here's the vibe ✨ β€” this function checks if the display average bandwidth fits inside the display dram bandwidth (CIK). That's it, that's the whole assignment πŸ’…

It's used for display watermark bandwidth calculations, bestie. Watermarks are literally the main character here πŸ‘‘

And the return value? Very demure, very simple:

  • returns true if the display fits 🟒 slay
  • returns false if it does not πŸ”΄ not slay, but like, informative

🌈 SEE ALSO 🌈

Kernel file ./drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/cik.c β€” go read it, it's giving lore πŸ“–

the whole friend group, fr fr 🫢:


πŸ’€ lowkey obligatory disclaimer: this page is ./drivers/gpu/drm/radeon, dated October 2026, and the manual it belongs to is dce8_average..._for_display(9). that's the receipt, bestie 🧾✨ go touch some cik.c and hydrate πŸ’œ
πŸ“¦ where this page comes from