vmw_execbuf_res_val_add(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

✨ NAME ✨

okay bestie, meet vmw_execbuf_res_val_add(9) from the Kernel API Manual β€” and its whole main-character job is literally β€œAdd a resource to the validation list.” no cap, that’s the vibe πŸ’…


✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

int vmw_execbuf_res_val_add (struct vmw_sw_context *sw_context , struct
       vmw_resource *res , u32 dirty , u32 flags );

🌸 ARGUMENTS 🌸

  • sw_context β€” pointer to the software context. 🫢
  • res β€” unreferenced rcu-protected pointer to the resource. bestie, that exact descriptor matters β€” it’s unreferenced and rcu-protected. πŸ’–
  • dirty β€” whether to change dirty status. yes, the dirty-status vibe check. 🫧
  • flags β€” specifies whether to use the context or not. simple as that. ✨

⭐ RETURN ⭐

0 on success. Negative error code on failure. Typical error codes are -EINVAL on inconsistency and -ESRCH if the resource was doomed. 😭 doomed resource is such a tragic little plot twist, but okay.

not me warning you to actually check that return value β€” the manpage says negative error code on failure, and we respect the lore. πŸ’€

πŸ”₯ SEE ALSO πŸ”₯

Kernel file ./drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_execbuf.c plus this absolutely stacked friend group of references β€” every single one is here, bestie, no skips:


mwah πŸ’‹ this cutie came from ./drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx, dated October 2026, and the page is vmw_execbuf_res_val_add(9). bye bestie β€” go validate those resources responsibly! πŸ«ΆπŸŽ€

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from