dm_test_exec...ull_dmub_srv(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

✨ dm_test_execute_dmub_cmd_null_dmub_srv ✨

okay so bestie, welcome to the Kernel API Manual πŸ’– you're literally reading the page for dm_test_execute_dmub_cmd_null_dmub_srv(9) and honestly? she's a whole vibe. very "testing the sad path" of you. let's get into it πŸŽ€


🌸 NAME 🌸

dm_test_execute_dmub_cmd_null_dmub_srv β€” a test that checks command execution fails when there's no DMUB service. no service, no slay, just a clean little failure. πŸ’…


πŸ¦‹ SYNOPSIS πŸ¦‹

void dm_test_execute_dmub_cmd_null_dmub_srv (struct kunit *test );

πŸŽ€ ARGUMENTS πŸŽ€

  • test β€” the KUnit test context, aka the little group-chat she's operating in. everything she needs to know about the test run lives here 🫢

πŸ’œ DESCRIPTION πŸ’œ

so picture this: the context has no DC DMUB service on it. like, none. zero. absent. πŸ™ˆ and in that situation, dc_dmub_srv_cmd_run comes back with false β€” a big fat no β€” and then dm_execute_dmub_cmd propagates that failure right on up the chain. the failure gets passed along like a "hey bestie, this didn't work" text. that's literally the whole point of the test: confirming the failure travels correctly. no cap, that's it. ⭐


πŸ”₯ SEE ALSO πŸ”₯

🌈 Kernel file 🌈

./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/tests/amdgpu_dm_dmub_test.c

πŸ‘‘ The rest of the friend group πŸ‘‘

like the entire test suite said "we're all going in SEE ALSO" and honestly? iconic. here's every single one, in order, no skips:


and that's the page, bestie 🧚 go forth and test your failure paths. mwah. πŸ’‹

signing off from ./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/..., dated October 2026, and yes the header title is literally dm_test_exec...ull_dmub_srv(9) because some of us get truncated by the terminal and we simply do not let it kill the vibe 🌸✨

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from