dm_test_dmub...w_init_fails(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… dm_test_dmub_hw_init_hw_init_fails(9) β€” from the Kernel API Manual, bestie πŸŽ€

okay so this is a page out of the Kernel API Manual, and it's all about one little KUnit test. pull up a chair, we're getting into it ✨


πŸ¦‹ NAME πŸ¦‹

dm_test_dmub_hw_init_hw_init_fails β€” literally the test that checks hw init hands back -EINVAL when DMUB init goes sideways πŸ’€


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

void dm_test_dmub_hw_init_hw_init_fails (struct kunit *test );

πŸ’– ARGUMENTS πŸ’–

  • test β€” the KUnit test context, aka the little vibe-holder that carries the test's state. no notes, she's just doing her job 🫢

✨ DESCRIPTION ✨

so here's the tea β˜•: if the framebuffer-info window count comes in below the required total, then dmub_srv_hw_init is gonna straight-up reject the whole request. no hesitation, no second chances, blocked. πŸ™…β€β™€οΈ

and because of that, dm_dmub_hw_init logs it and returns -EINVAL. iconic behavior, honestly. the test is just here to confirm that's exactly what happens πŸ‘‘

⚠️ heads up bestie: that rejection path emits a one-time WARN via ASSERT. so yes, you will see it, and no, it's not a bug in your setup β€” it's the expected drama 😭

πŸ”₯ SEE ALSO πŸ”₯

the whole friend group, in order, no one left out πŸ’œ


and that's the whole page, bestie πŸ’… sourced from ./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/... and dated October 2026 β€” go forth and let your hw init fail correctly πŸ§šβ€β™€οΈπŸ’–
πŸ“¦ where this page comes from