dm_test_dmub..._no_firmware(9)
π NAME π
Okay so this page is dm_test_dmub..._no_firmware(9) from the Kernel API Manual, and it's giving very targeted kernel-test energy. The name is dm_test_dmub_hw_init_no_firmware β test that hw init fails without firmware. Short, specific, iconic. π
β¨ SYNOPSIS β¨
void dm_test_dmub_hw_init_no_firmware (struct kunit *test );
π ARGUMENTS π
testβ the KUnit test context. It's the context package this test function gets handed, and yes bestie, that's the whole argument list. π«Ά
π¦ DESCRIPTION π¦
Okay so picture the setup: a DMUB service and framebuffer info are present, but there's no firmware. In that situation, dm_dmub_hw_init should return -EINVAL. That's the expected result this page is documenting, fr fr. π
π SEE ALSO π
The related-pages group chat is long, and every single one of these is invited:
- Kernel file:
./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/tests/amdgpu_dm_dmub_test.c dm_test_register_dmub_notify_callback_null_callback(9)dm_test_register_dmub_notify_callback_type_out_of_range(9)dm_test_register_dmub_notify_callback_valid(9)dm_test_register_dmub_notify_callback_offload_false(9)dm_test_dmub_aux_setconfig_callback_copies_and_completes(9)dm_test_dmub_aux_setconfig_callback_non_aux_no_complete(9)dm_test_dmub_aux_setconfig_callback_aux_with_null_dm_notify(9)dm_test_dmub_aux_setconfig_callback_set_config_reply(9)dm_test_dmub_aux_fused_io_callback_copies_reply_and_completes(9)dm_test_dmub_aux_fused_io_callback_max_ddc_line(9)dm_test_dmub_aux_fused_io_callback_null_args(9)dm_test_get_default_ips_mode_dcn35(9)dm_test_get_default_ips_mode_dcn351(9)dm_test_get_default_ips_mode_dcn36(9)dm_test_get_default_ips_mode_older_than_dcn35(9)dm_test_get_default_ips_mode_newer_default(9)dm_test_dmub_hw_init_no_dmub_srv(9)dm_test_dmub_hw_init_no_fb_info(9)dm_test_dmub_hw_init_success_fake_dmub(9)dm_test_dmub_hw_init_no_hw_support(9)dm_test_dmub_hw_init_bss_data(9)dm_test_dmub_hw_init_hw_init_fails(9)dm_test_dmub_hw_init_auto_load_timeout(9)dm_test_dmub_hw_init_apu_dpia_dcn35(9)dm_test_dmub_hw_init_sanity_checks_dcn31(9)dm_test_dmub_hw_init_sanity_checks_dcn314(9)dm_test_dmub_hw_init_dmcu_abm(9)dm_test_dmub_hw_resume_no_dmub_srv(9)dm_test_dmub_hw_resume_initialized_dmub(9)dm_test_dmub_hw_resume_full_init(9)dm_test_dmub_hw_resume_init_check_failed(9)dm_test_dmub_hw_resume_auto_load_timeout(9)dm_test_dmub_sw_init_unsupported_asic(9)dm_test_init_microcode_unsupported_asic(9)dm_test_dmub_get_vbios_bounding_box_default_null(9)dm_test_execute_dmub_cmd_null_dmub_srv(9)dm_test_process_dmub_aux_transfer_sync_engine_acquire(9)dm_test_process_dmub_aux_transfer_sync_protocol_error(9)dm_test_process_dmub_aux_transfer_sync_copies_data(9)dm_test_process_dmub_aux_transfer_sync_zero_length(9)dm_test_process_dmub_set_config_sync_unknown_error(9)dm_test_abort_fused_io_no_dmub_srv(9)
That's the whole vibe, bestie. The source/version line points at ./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/..., the date says October 2026, and the title is dm_test_dmub..._no_firmware(9). byeee, go be the main character of your kernel tests ππ§β¨
π¦ where this page comes from
- nixpkgs unstable: linux-manual 7.3.1
- π girlified by deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 on : a language model's rewrite of the original, under its terms