dm_test_proc...nknown_error(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… dm_test_proc...nknown_error β€” from the Kernel API Manual ✨

okay so bestie, buckle up β€” this is a page straight out of the Kernel API Manual, and it's about one very specific little KUnit test. she's niche, she's focused, she knows exactly what she's about πŸŽ€


🌸 NAME 🌸

dm_test_process_dmub_set_config_sync_unknown_error β€” the test that checks SET_CONFIG finishes up with an unknown error. yep, that's the whole vibe. πŸ’€


✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

void dm_test_process_dmub_set_config_sync_unknown_error (struct kunit
       *test );

literally just the one function, one arg, no notes. 🫢


πŸ¦‹ ARGUMENTS πŸ¦‹

  • test β€” the KUnit test context. that's it, that's the arg. she's carrying the whole test on her shoulders πŸ’–

πŸ‘‘ DESCRIPTION πŸ‘‘

so here's the tea β˜• β€” when there's no DC DMUB service around, dc_process_dmub_set_config_async can't reach the firmware at all. and instead of just ghosting, it reports the command as completed with SET_CONFIG_UNKNOWN_ERROR.

which means amdgpu_dm_process_dmub_set_config_sync comes back with 0 and that status. no cap, that's the expected behavior β€” the test is literally checking that this is what happens. πŸ”₯


🌈 SEE ALSO 🌈

first up, the kernel file this whole thing lives in πŸ‘‡

  • Kernel file ./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/tests/amdgpu_dm_dmub_test.c

and now the full friend group β€” every single one of these is invited to the party πŸŽ‰ (i'm not skipping a single one, bestie, we don't do that here):


🫢 quick heads up bestie: all of the above are the sibling test functions β€” same family, different drama. go read them if you want the full lore. iykyk πŸ’œ

and that's the page!! 🌸 this little cutie came from ./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/... and she's dated October 2026 β€” mark your calendars, she's a whole era πŸ’…βœ¨ mwah, bye bestie! πŸŽ€

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from