dm_test_pro...otocol_error(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

✨ dm_test_pro...otocol_error(9) ✨

okay so real talk, this little cutie lives in the Kernel API Manual and she is literally a KUnit test for the AMD display DMUB AUX transfer path πŸ¦‹ buckle up bestie, it's a short one but it's iconic.


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

void dm_test_process_dmub_aux_transfer_sync_protocol_error (struct kunit
*test );

πŸŽ€ ARGUMENTS πŸŽ€

  • test β€” the KUnit test context πŸ’… that's it, that's the whole argument, she only needs one thing and honestly? respect.

πŸ’– DESCRIPTION πŸ’–

Okay so picture this: the completion is pre-signaled going in, and there's a fake DC DMUB service that straight up rejects the command after construction πŸ™ˆ. Under those conditions, the sync helper is supposed to propagate the notification result β€” and here's the slay part β€” without waiting for real firmware. no cap, no hardware, no drama, just vibes and a mock service doing its little job πŸ‘‘

it's giving "test the error path so production never has to" energy fr fr 🫢


πŸ”₯ SEE ALSO πŸ”₯

Kernel file β€” ./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/tests/amdgpu_dm_dmub_test.c πŸ“ (go read the source, iykyk)

and the whole squad, in order, no crumbs left behind:


ngl there are no options, no exit statuses, no environment variables, no signals and no bugs listed here β€” this page is just a test description and her friend group πŸ’€ don't go looking for flags bestie, they're not coming.

and that's the whole page!! mwah πŸ’‹ this one's sourced from ./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/... and stamped October 2026 β€” so like, future icon behavior honestly 🌈⭐ go forth and run your KUnit tests, bestie, the protocol error path is covered πŸ§šβ€β™€οΈπŸ’œ

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from