dm_test_dmub...load_timeout(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

✨ dm_test_dmub_hw_resume_auto_load_timeout πŸ’…

okay bestie, welcome to the Kernel API Manual β€” this one's a KUnit test page from the DRM/AMD display corner of the kernel, and honestly it's giving "small function, big feelings" 🫢


🌸 NAME 🌸

dm_test_dmub_hw_resume_auto_load_timeout β€” a test that proves resume tolerates an auto-load timeout, no cap πŸ’―


✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

void dm_test_dmub_hw_resume_auto_load_timeout (struct kunit *test );

πŸŽ€ ARGUMENTS πŸŽ€

  • test β€” the KUnit test context, aka the little group-chat the test lives in πŸ’¬

πŸ¦‹ DESCRIPTION πŸ¦‹

okay so picture this: the DMUB comes back and reports that the hardware is already initialized, but the firmware literally never signals ready. awkward 😭 The auto-load wait inside resume times out β€” and the only thing it does is warn.

The whole point of this test: the call must not crash. That's it, that's the vibe. It warns and keeps it moving, periodt. πŸ‘‘


πŸ’œ SEE ALSO πŸ’œ

Kernel file

./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/tests/amdgpu_dm_dmub_test.c

and the whole friend group of related tests, all (9), all iconic ✨


that's the whole page, bestie β€” go forth and test with main character energy πŸ’…

sign-off szn πŸŽ€: this one comes from ./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/... and it's dated October 2026 β€” yes, future-dated, we love a forward-thinking queen βœ¨πŸ‘‘

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from