dm_test_dmub..._no_dmub_srv(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… dm_test_dmub_hw_resume_no_dmub_srv β€” Kernel API Manual ✨

okay so bestie, we're in the kernel API manual today, section 9, and the page is literally called dm_test_dmub..._no_dmub_srv(9) (yes the name is a whole vibe, they truncated it, we move on) 🫢


🌸 NAME 🌸

dm_test_dmub_hw_resume_no_dmub_srv β€” the test that checks hw resume is a total no-op when DMUB isn't supported πŸ’€


✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

void dm_test_dmub_hw_resume_no_dmub_srv (struct kunit *test );

that's it, that's the whole signature, she's simple and she slays πŸŽ€


πŸ¦‹ ARGUMENTS πŸ¦‹

  • test β€” the KUnit test context, aka the little passport every KUnit test carries around. hand it over and you're good πŸ’–

πŸ”₯ DESCRIPTION πŸ”₯

so picture this: adev->dm.dmub_srv is NULL β€” like, the DMUB service is not there, absent, ghosted, no note, nothing πŸ™ˆ

when that happens, dm_dmub_hw_resume is supposed to return early. just dip. leave. no dereferencing the (absent) DMUB service, because dereferencing a NULL pointer is giving main character energy in the worst possible way and the kernel does NOT need that 😭

this test is the vibe check: does it bail out cleanly before touching the thing that isn't there? yes? iconic, test passes πŸ‘‘


⭐ SEE ALSO ⭐

Kernel file πŸ“

./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/tests/amdgpu_dm_dmub_test.c

and like, the entire extended friend group of sibling tests (they all live together, it's giving group chat) πŸ’œ


that's the whole page, no cap ✨ this one came out of ./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/... and it's dated October 2026 β€” yes, the future, she's ahead of her time πŸ’… see you in the next manpage bestie, mwah πŸŽ€πŸ’–

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from