RFC 1399

Summary of 1300-1399

πŸ“… published January 1997, from ietf

RFC 1399: Request for Comments Summary πŸ’–

Okay bestie, so this is RFC 1399 πŸŽ€ by J. Elliott at ISI, part of the Network Working Group ✨. It's filed as Informational and dated January 1997. It's a summary of RFC numbers 1300-1399, and its header doesn't list anything it obsoletes or updates 🧚


Status of This Memo 🌸

This RFC is a slightly annotated list of the 100 RFCs from RFC 1300 through RFCs 1399. It's a status report on those RFCs. This memo provides information for the Internet community, and it does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited πŸ’…

Note πŸ¦‹

Plenty of these RFCs (but not all!) are Proposed Standards, Draft Standards, or Standards. Their status can change during standards processing, so we're only noting here that they're on the standards track. For the current state and status of these RFCs, check the latest edition of "Internet Official Protocol Standards" πŸ“š In the list below, RFCs on the standards track are marked [STANDARDS-TRACK] 🫢

The Index πŸŽ€

RFC     Author       Date      Title
---     ------       ----      -----

1399    Elliott      Jan 97   Requests For Comments Summary

RFC 1399 ✨

This is literally just "This memo." πŸ™ˆ Which, fair, it's this doc!

RFC 1398 πŸ’–

1398    Kastenholz   Jan 93   Definitions of Managed Objects for the
                              Ethernet-like Interface Types

This memo defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB) for use with network management protocols in TCP/IP-based internets. It's giving objects for managing Ethernet-like objects πŸ”₯ [STANDARDS-TRACK]

RFC 1397 🌈

1397    Haskin       Jan 93   Default Route Advertisement In BGP2 and
                              BGP3 Versions of the Border Gateway
                              Protocol

This document spells out the recommendation of the BGP Working Group on default route advertisement support in BGP2 [1] and BGP3 [2] versions of the Border Gateway Protocol. [STANDARDS-TRACK] πŸ¦‹

RFC 1396 🌸

1396    Crocker      Jan 93   The Process for Organization of Internet
                              Standards

This report summarizes the POISED Working Group (WG), from the events that led to forming the WG through the end of 1992. This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard πŸ“š

RFC 1395 🧚

1395    Reynolds     Jan 93   BOOTP Vendor Information Extensions

This RFC is a slight revision and extension of RFC-1048 by Philip Prindeville, who should be credited with the original work in this memo. This memo will be updated as additional tags are defined. This edition introduces Tag 14 for Merit Dump File, Tag 15 for Domain Name, Tag 16 for Swap Server, and Tag 17 for Root Path πŸŽ€ It's a status report on the vendor information extensions used in the Bootstrap Protocol (BOOTP) ✨

RFC 1394 πŸ’œ

1394    Robinson     Jan 93   Relationship of Telex Answerback Codes
                              to Internet Domains

This RFC gives the list, as best known, of all common Internet domains and the conversion between specific country telex answerback codes and Internet country domain identifiers. It also lists the telex code and international dialing code, wherever it's available. It will also list major Internet "Public" E-Mail addresses. This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard πŸ’…

RFC 1393 πŸ“

1393    Malkin       Jan 93   Traceroute Using an IP Option

This document specifies a new IP option and ICMP message type. It duplicates the functionality of the existing traceroute method while generating fewer packets and completing in a shorter time. This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet community ⭐

RFC 1392 🫢

1392    Malkin       Jan 93   Internet Users' Glossary

There are many networking glossaries out there. This one concentrates on terms that are specific to the Internet πŸ“– This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard.

RFC 1391 🌈

1391    Malkin       Jan 93   The Tao of IETF
                              A Guide for New Attendees of the
                              Internet Engineering Task Force

The purpose of this For Your Information (FYI) RFC is to explain to newcomers how the IETF works. It'll give them a warm, fuzzy feeling and help them make the meeting more productive for everyone πŸ₯° This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard.

RFC 1390 πŸ¦‹

1390    Katz         Jan 93   Transmission of IP and ARP over FDDI
                              Networks

This memo defines a method for encapsulating Internet Protocol (IP) datagrams and Address Resolution Protocol (ARP) requests and replies on Fiber Distributed Data Interface (FDDI) Networks. [STANDARDS-TRACK] ✨

RFC 1389 πŸ’–

1389    Malkin       Jan 93   RIP Version 2 MIB Extension

This memo defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB) for use with network management protocols in TCP/IP-based internets. [STANDARDS-TRACK] πŸ”₯

RFC 1388 πŸ‘‘

1388    Malkin       Jan 93   RIP Version 2
                              Carrying Additional Information

This document specifies an extension of the Routing Information Protocol (RIP), as defined in [1]. It expands the amount of useful information carried in RIP packets and adds a measure of security πŸ” [STANDARDS-TRACK]

RFC 1387 🌸

1387    Malkin       Jan 93   RIP Version 2 Protocol Analysis

As required by Routing Protocol Criteria (RFC 1264), this report documents the key features of the RIP-2 protocol and the current implementation experience. This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard πŸ“š

RFC 1386 πŸŽ€

1386    Cooper       Dec 92   The US Domain

This is a description of the US Top Level Domains on the Internet. This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ

RFC 1385 🧚

1385    Wang         Nov 92   EIP: The Extended Internet Protocol
                              A Framework for Maintaining Backward
                              Compatibility

EIP can substantially reduce the amount of modifications needed to current Internet systems and greatly ease the difficulties of transition. This is an "idea" paper, and discussion is strongly encouraged on Big-Internet@munnari.oz.au. This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard πŸ’‘

RFC 1384 🫢

1384    Barker       Jan 93   Naming Guidelines for Directory Pilots

This document defines a number of naming guidelines. Alignment to these guidelines is recommended for directory pilots. This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard 🌷

RFC 1383 πŸ’œ

1383    Huitema      Dec 92   An Experiment in DNS Based IP Routing

Potential solutions to the routing explosion. This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet community πŸ§ͺ

RFC 1382 πŸ“

1382    Throop       Nov 92   SNMP MIB Extension for the X.25 Packet
                              Layer

This memo defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB) for use with network management protocols in TCP/IP-based internets. [STANDARDS-TRACK] ✨

RFC 1381 🌈

1381    Throop       Nov 92   SNMP MIB Extension for X.25 LAPB

This memo defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB) for use with network management protocols in TCP/IP-based internets. In particular, it defines objects for managing the Link Layer of X.25, LAPB. [STANDARDS-TRACK] πŸ¦‹

RFC 1380 🌸

1380    Gross        Nov 92    IESG Deliberations on Routing and
                               Addressing

This memo summarizes issues surrounding the routing and addressing scaling problems in the IP architecture. It also gives a brief background of the ROAD group and related activities in the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard πŸ—ΊοΈ

RFC 1379 πŸ‘‘

1379    Braden       Nov 92    Extending TCP for Transactions --
                               Concepts

This memo discusses extending TCP to provide transaction-oriented service, without altering its virtual-circuit operation. This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard πŸ’…

RFC 1378 πŸŽ€

1378    Parker       Nov 92    The PPP AppleTalk Control Protocol
                               (ATCP)

This document defines the NCP for establishing and configuring the AppleTalk Protocol [3] over PPP. [STANDARDS-TRACK] 🍎

RFC 1377 πŸ’–

1377     Katz        Nov 92    The PPP OSI Network Layer Control
                               Protocol (OSINLCP)

This document defines the NCP for establishing and configuring OSI Network Layer Protocols. [STANDARDS-TRACK] πŸ”§

RFC 1376 🧚

1376    Senum         Nov 92   The PPP DECnet Phase IV Control
                               Protocol (DNCP)

This document defines the NCP for establishing and configuring Digital's DNA Phase IV Routing protocol (DECnet Phase IV) over PPP. It applies only to DNA Phase IV Routing messages (both data and control), and not to other DNA Phase IV protocols (MOP, LAT, etc.). [STANDARDS-TRACK] 🌐

RFC 1375 🌈

1375    Robinson      Oct 92   Suggestion for New Classes of IP
                               Addresses

This RFC suggests changing the method of specifying the IP address to add new classes of networks called F, G, H, and K. The goal is to reduce wasted address space and increase the available IP address number space, especially for smaller organizations or classes of connectors that don't need or want a full Class C IP address 🫧 This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard.

RFC 1374 πŸ¦‹

1374    Renwick       Oct 92   IP and ARP on HIPPI

The ANSI X3T9.3 committee has drafted a proposal for encapsulating IEEE 802.2 LLC PDUs and, by implication, IP on HIPPI. Another X3T9.3 draft describes the operation of HIPPI physical switches. X3T9.3 chose to leave HIPPI networking issues largely outside the scope of their standards. This document discusses ways to use ANSI standard HIPPI hardware and protocols in the context of the Internet, including using HIPPI switches as LANs and interoperating with other networks. This memo is intended to become an Internet Standard. [STANDARDS-TRACK] ⚑

RFC 1373 🌸

1373    Tignor        Oct 92   PORTABLE DUAs

This document comes in two parts. The first part is for regular people who want to set up their own DUAs (Directory User Interfaces) to access the Directory. The second part is for ISODE-maintainers who want to provide portable DUAs to users. It gives instructions in a similar but longer, step-by-step format. This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard πŸ“

RFC 1372 πŸ’œ

1372    Hedrick       Oct 92   Telnet Remote Flow Control Option

This document specifies an extended version of the Telnet Remote Flow Control Option, RFC 1080, with the addition of the RESTART-ANY and RESTART-XON suboptions. [STANDARDS-TRACK] πŸŽ›οΈ

RFC 1371 πŸ‘‘

1371    Gross         Oct 92   Choosing a "Common IGP" for the IP
                               Internet
                               (The IESG's Recommendation to the IAB)

This memo presents the motivation, rationale, and other background information behind the IESG's recommendation to the IAB for a single "common IGP" for the IP portions of the Internet. This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard πŸ—³οΈ

RFC 1370 πŸ“

1370    I.A.B.        Oct 92   Applicability Statement for OSPF

This Applicability Statement places a requirement on vendors claiming conformance to this standard. It's there to make sure users have the option of deploying OSPF when they need a multivendor, interoperable IGP in their environment. [STANDARDS-TRACK] πŸ› οΈ

RFC 1369 🫢

1369    Kastenholz    Oct 92   Implementation Notes and Experience for
                               The Internet Ethernet MIB

This document reflects the currently known status of 11 different

to be continued in part 2 πŸ§šπŸ’œ

implementations of the MIB, built by 7 different vendors on 7 different Ethernet interface chips πŸ’… This one's info for the Internet community, not a standard, so no pressure to implement it 🫢

Heads up: this stretch is actually the RFC index listing (RFCs 1339 to 1368), not RFC 1399's body text, so I've kept the entries as they're listed.

RFC 1368 Β· McMaster Β· Oct 92 Definitions of Managed Objects for IEEE 802.3 Repeater Devices

This one defines a chunk of the Management Information Base (MIB) for network management protocols in TCP/IP-based internets 🧚 Specifically, it's all about objects for managing IEEE 802.3 10 Mb/second baseband repeaters, aka "hubs" πŸ”₯ [STANDARDS-TRACK]

RFC 1367 Β· Topolcic Β· Oct 92 Schedule for IP Address Space Management Guidelines

This memo suggests a schedule for putting the IP network number allocation plan from RFC 1366 into action πŸ“… Info for the Internet community, not a standard 🌸

RFC 1366 Β· Gerich Β· Oct 92 Guidelines for Management of IP Address Space

This doc got reviewed by the Federal Engineering Task Force (FEPG) on behalf of the Federal Networking Council (FNC), plus the co-chairs of the International Engineering Planning Group (IEPG) and the Reseaux IP Europeens (RIPE) πŸ‘‘ Those groups generally agreed to back the recommendations for managing the IP address space ✨ Info only, not a standard.

RFC 1365 Β· Siyan Β· Spt 92 An IP Address Extension Proposal

This RFC proposes an extension to IP to fix the shortage of IP addresses problem, and it's asking for discussion and suggestions for improvements πŸ¦‹ Info only, not a standard.

RFC 1364 Β· Varadhan Β· Spt 92 BGP OSPF Interaction

This memo lays out the criteria to use when designing Autonomous System Border Routers (ASBR) that run BGP with other ASBRs outside the AS, while using OSPF as their IGP πŸ’œ [STANDARDS-TRACK]

RFC 1363 Β· Partridge Β· Spt 92 A Proposed Flow Specification

The flow specification in this memo is for information and possible experimentation, meaning experimental use by consenting routers and applications only πŸ§ͺ This RFC is a product of the Internet Research Task Force (IRTF) 🌈 Info for the Internet community, not a standard.

RFC 1362 Β· Allen Β· Spt 92 Novell IPX Over Various WAN Media (IPXWAN)

This document explains how Novell IPX works over various WAN media 🌐 It describes the common "IPX WAN" protocol Novell uses to swap the router-to-router info it needs before sharing standard IPX routing info and traffic over WAN datalinks πŸ’… Info only, not a standard.

RFC 1361 Β· Mills Β· Aug 92 Simple Network Time Protocol (SNTP)

This memo describes SNTP, which is an adaptation of NTP used to sync computer clocks across the Internet ⏰ It does not obsolete or update any RFC πŸ™ˆ Info for the Internet community, not a standard.

RFC 1360 Β· I.A.B. Β· Spt 92 IAB OFFICIAL PROTOCOL STANDARDS

This one starts by talking through the standardization process and the RFC document series, then explains the terms πŸ“š Sections 6.2 - 6.9 have the lists of protocols at each stage of standardization πŸ‘‘ It wraps up with pointers to references and contacts for more info 🫢 [STANDARDS-TRACK]

RFC 1359 Β· ACM SIGUCCS Β· Aug 92 Connecting to the Internet What Connecting Institutions Should Anticipate

This FYI RFC lays out the big issues an institution should think about when deciding on and setting up a campus connection to the Internet 🏫 Info for the Internet community, not a standard.

RFC 1358 Β· Chapin Β· Aug 92 Charter of the Internet Architecture Board (IAB)

The Internet Architecture Board (IAB) shall be constituted and shall operate as a technical advisory group of the Internet Society 🧚 Info only, not a standard.

RFC 1357 Β· Cohen Β· Jul 92 A Format for E-mailing Bibliographic Records

This memo defines a format for E-mailing bibliographic records of technical reports πŸ“§ It's meant to speed up how info about new Computer Science Technical Reports (CS-TR) gets shared πŸ“ Info only, not a standard.

RFC 1356 Β· Malis Β· Aug 92 Multiprotocol Interconnect on X.25 and ISDN in the Packet Mode

This document specifies how IP and other network layer protocols get encapsulated over X.25 networks, lined up with ISO/IEC and CCITT standards πŸ”— It replaces RFC 877, "A Standard for the Transmission of IP Datagrams Over Public Data Networks" [1] πŸ’– [STANDARDS-TRACK]

RFC 1355 Β· Curran Β· Aug 92 Privacy and Accuracy Issues in Network Information Center Databases

This document is a set of guidelines for running and administering public Network Information Center (NIC) databases πŸ” Info for the Internet community, not a standard.

RFC 1354 Β· Baker Β· Jul 92 IP Forwarding Table MIB

This memo defines a portion of the MIB for network management protocols in TCP/IP-based internets πŸ—ΊοΈ Specifically, it's for managing routes in the IP Internet πŸ›£οΈ [STANDARDS-TRACK]

RFC 1353 Β· McCloghrie Β· Jul 92 Definitions of Managed Objects for Administration of SNMP Parties

This memo defines another MIB portion for TCP/IP-based internets 🧩 It describes a way to represent the SNMP parties defined in [8] as objects, following the Internet Standard SMI [1] ✨ [STANDARDS-TRACK]

RFC 1352 Β· Galvin Β· Jul 92 SNMP Security Protocols

The Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) specification [1] lets network management operations be protected by a range of security protocols πŸ”’ The SNMP administrative model in [2] gives a framework for securing SNMP network management, and inside that framework this memo defines protocols for three security services: data integrity, data origin authentication and data confidentiality πŸ’œ [STANDARDS-TRACK]

RFC 1351 Β· Davin Β· Jul 92 SNMP Administrative Model

This memo builds on the SNMP administrative model set out in [1] 🧠 The model gives a unified conceptual basis for administering SNMP protocol entities, covering authentication and integrity, privacy, access control, and cooperation of protocol entities 🫧 [STANDARDS-TRACK]

RFC 1350 Β· Sollins Β· Jul 92 THE TFTP PROTOCOL (REVISION 2)

TFTP is a super simple protocol for transferring files πŸ“ That's where its name comes from: Trivial File Transfer Protocol, or TFTP πŸ’… Each nonterminal packet gets acknowledged separately βœ… This document describes the protocol and its types of packets, and it also explains the reasons behind some of the design decisions 🧚 [STANDARDS-TRACK]

RFC 1349 Β· Almquist Β· Jul 92 Type of Service in the Internet Protocol Suite

This memo changes and clarifies some parts of the semantics of the Type of Service octet in the IP header πŸŽ€ [STANDARDS-TRACK]

RFC 1348 Β· Manning Β· Jul 92 DNS NSAP RRs

This RFC defines the format of two new Resource Records (RRs) for the Domain Name System (DNS), and it reserves matching DNS type mnemonics and numerical codes πŸ¦‹ This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet community πŸ§ͺ

RFC 1347 Β· Callon Β· Jun 92 TCP and UDP with bigger Addresses (TUBA), A Simple Proposal for Internet Addressing and Routing

This paper describes a simple proposal for a long-term fix to Internet addressing, routing, and scaling 🌍 Info for the Internet community, not a standard.

RFC 1346 Β· Jones Β· Jun 92 Resource Allocation, Control, and Accounting for the Use of Network Resources

The point of this RFC is to get discussion going on the specific challenges in large service networks in general, and the International IP Internet in particular πŸ—£οΈ No solution in this document is meant to be a standard. The hope is that a general consensus will form on the right solutions, which could eventually lead to standards 🌸 Info only, not a standard.

RFC 1345 Β· Simonsen Β· Jun 92 Character Mnemonics & Character Sets

This memo lists a selection of characters and shows which coded character sets they appear in πŸ”€ Info for the Internet community, not a standard.

RFC 1344 Β· Borenstein Β· Jun 92 Implicaitons of MIME for Internet Mail Gateways

MIME was designed so it doesn't need any changes to Internet electronic message transport facilities πŸ“¬ Still, there are a few ways message transport systems can take advantage of MIME, and this memo is all about those opportunities πŸ’– Info only, not a standard.

RFC 1343 Β· Borenstein Β· Jun 92 A User Agent Configuration Mechanism For Multimedia Mial Format Information

This memo suggests a file format that tells multiple mail reading user agent programs about the locally-installed tools for handling mail in various formats πŸ“¨ Info for the Internet community, not a standard.

RFC 1342 Β· Moore Β· Jun 92 Representation of Non-ASCII Text in Internet Message Headers

This memo extends the message format from [1] (known to the IETF Mail Extensions Working Group as "RFC 1341") so character sets other than ASCII can show up in RFC 822 message headers 🌏 [STANDARDS-TRACK]

RFC 1341 Β· Borenstein Β· Jun 92 MIME: Mechanisms for Specifying and Describing the Format of Internet Message Bodies

This document redefines how message bodies are formatted, so multi-part textual and non-textual message bodies can be represented and exchanged without losing information 🎁 [STANDARDS-TRACK]

RFC 1340 Β· Reynolds Β· Jul 92 ASSIGNED NUMBERS

This Network Working Group Request for Comments lists the currently assigned values from several series of numbers used in network protocol implementations πŸ”’ This memo is a status report on the parameters (numbers and keywords) used in protocols in the Internet community πŸ“Š

RFC 1339 Β· Dorner Β· Jun 92 Remote Mail Checking Protocol

This RFC defines a protocol that offers a mail checking service between a client and server pair πŸ“¬ Usually a small program on a client workstation uses it to ask a server whether new mail has arrived for a specified user πŸ’Œ This memo

The source text cuts off right here mid-sentence, so I've left it hanging too.

This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet community. bestie, that's the tail end of the last entry πŸ§ͺ✨ okay so let's keep going!

1338    Fuller         Jun 92   Supernetting: an Address Assignment
                                and Aggregation Strategy

This one is giving "make the address space last longer" πŸ’… It talks through ways to assign the existing IP address space so we conserve it and slow down the explosive growth of routing tables in default-route-free routers run by transit routing domain providers. It's informational, not a standard πŸ“š

1337    Braden         May 92   TIME-WAIT Assassination Hazards in TCP

ngl this one is lowkey spicy πŸ™ˆ It describes some theoretically possible failure modes for TCP connections and talks about possible remedies. One very simple fix gets singled out. Also informational, so no standard vibes here.

1336    Malkin         May 92   Who's Who in the Internet
                                Biographies of IAB, IESG and
                                IRSG Members

This FYI RFC is the cute little yearbook πŸŽ€ It has biographical info about the members of the Internet Activities Board (IAB), the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG) of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), and the the Internet Research Steering Group (IRSG) of the Internet Research Task Force (IRTF). Informational, and it doesn't specify any standard.

1335    Wang           May 92   A Two-Tier Address Structure for the
                                Internet:  A Solution to the Problem
                                of Address Space Exhaustion

Main character energy πŸ‘‘ This RFC tackles address space exhaustion in the Internet with a two-tier address structure. It's an "idea" paper, and discussion is strongly encouraged πŸ¦‹ Informational, not a standard.

1334    Lloyd          Oct 92   PPP Authentication Protocols

This one defines two authentication protocols for PPP: the Password Authentication Protocol and the Challenge-Handshake Authentication Protocol πŸ” [STANDARDS-TRACK]

1333    Simpson        May 92   PPP Link Quality Monitoring

okay so PPP [1] gives us a standard way to encapsulate Network Layer protocol information over point-to-point links 🧚 It also defines an extensible Link Control Protocol, which lets you negotiate a Quality Protocol for continuously monitoring how viable the link is. [STANDARDS-TRACK]

1332    McGregor       May 92   The PPP Internet Protocol Control
                                Protocol (IPCP)

Same PPP energy, new glow-up 🌸 PPP [1] still does the standard encapsulation thing, and the Link Control Protocol is still extensible. This one also proposes a family of Network Control Protocols (NCPs) for establishing and configuring different network-layer protocols. [STANDARDS-TRACK]

1331    Simpson        May 92   The Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP>
                                for the Transmission of Multi-protocol
                                Datagrams over Point-to-Point Links

This is the big one for PPP πŸ’– It defines the PPP encapsulation scheme, together with the PPP Link Control Protocol (LCP), an extensible option negotiation protocol that can negotiate a rich assortment of configuration parameters and also provides additional management functions. [STANDARDS-TRACK]

1330    E.S.C.C.       May 92   Recommendations for the Phase I
                                Deployment of OSI Directory Services
                                (X.500) and OSI Message Handling
                                Services <X.400) within the ESnet
                                Community

This one is basically a near word-for-word copy of the whitepaper from the ESnet Site Coordinating Committee's X.500/X.400 Task Force πŸ“ Informational, so it's not a standard.

1329    Kuehn          May 92   Thoughts on Address Resolution for
                                Dual MAC FDDI Networks

ngl this is a niche little idea πŸ™ˆ It's about how IP and ARP can be used on inhomogeneous FDDI networks (the ones with single MAC and dual MAC stations). The trick is adding a new protocol layer to the protocol suite of the dual MAC stations. Informational, not a standard.

1328    Kille          May 92   X.400 1988 to 1984 downgrading

This one is about the downgrade drama from X.400(1988) to X.400(1984) [MHS88a, MHS84] πŸ’€ Annexe B of X.419 has some downgrading rules [MHS88b], but they aren't enough for a service running with both 1984 and 1988 components. So this doc adds a bunch of extensions to that annexe. [STANDARDS-TRACK]

1327    Kille          May 92   Mapping between X.400(1988) / ISO
                                10021 and RFC 822

This is the translator bestie πŸ¦‹ It specifies a mapping between two protocols. The spec should be used when that mapping happens on the DARPA Internet or in the UK Academic Community. It may be modified in light of implementation experience, but no substantial changes are expected. [STANDARDS-TRACK]

1326    Tsuchiya       May 92   Mutual Encapsulation Considered
                                Dangerous

Dramatic title, dramatic memo 😭 It describes a packet explosion problem that can happen when protocols encapsulate each other (A encapsulates B and B encapsulates A). Informational, not a standard.

1325    Malkin         May 92   FYI on Questions and Answers
                                Answers to Commonly asked "New
                                Internet User" Questions

This FYI RFC is one of two FYIs called "Questions and Answers" (Q/A), made by the User Services Working Group of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) 🌈 The goal is to document the most commonly asked questions and their answers on the Internet. Informational, not a standard.

1324    Reed           May 92   A Discussion on Computer Network
                                Conferencing

This memo wants more people to know about what's happening in Computer Conferencing πŸŽ€ It also puts forward ideas on what should be done to formalize this work, so programmers and others in the field can work from a common standard. Informational, so no standard here yet.

1323    Jacobson       May 92   TCP Extensions for High Performance

Speed queen behavior πŸ”₯ This memo presents a set of TCP extensions that improve performance over large bandwidth*delay product paths and provide reliable operation over very high-speed paths. It defines new TCP options for scaled windows and timestamps, designed to interwork compatibly with TCPs that don't implement the extensions. [STANDARDS-TRACK]

1322    Estrin         May 92   A Unified Approach to Inter-Domain
                                Routing

This is an informational RFC that outlines one potential approach to inter-domain routing in future global internets 🌸 Informational, not a standard.

1321    Rivest         Apr 92   The MD5 Message-Digest Algorithm

Okay the crypto icon πŸ” This document describes the MD5 message-digest algorithm. It takes a message of any length as input and produces a 128-bit "fingerprint" or "message digest" of the input. Informational, not a standard.

1320    Rivest         Apr 92   The MD4 Message-Digest Algorithm

MD4 showing up in the group chat πŸ’œ This document describes the MD4 message-digest algorithm [1]. It takes input of any length and gives back a 128-bit "fingerprint" or "message digest" of that input. Informational, not a standard.

1319    Kaliski        Apr 92   The MD2 Message-Digest Algorithm

And the OG of the trio 🧚 This document describes the MD2 message-digest algorithm. It takes a message of arbitrary length as input and produces a 128-bit "fingerprint" or "message digest" as output. Informational, not a standard.

1318    Stewart        Apr 92   Definitions of Managed Objects
                                for Parallel-printer-like Hardware
                                Devices

This memo defines a piece of the Management Information Base (MIB) for network management protocols in TCP/IP based internets πŸ–¨οΈ It focuses on objects for managing parallel-printer-like devices. [STANDARDS-TRACK]

1317    Stewart        Apr 92   Definitions of Managed Objects for
                                RS-232-like Hardware Devices

Another MIB chunk from the same girl πŸŽ€ It defines a portion of the MIB for network management protocols in TCP/IP based internets, specifically objects for managing RS-232-like devices. [STANDARDS-TRACK]

1316    Stewart        Apr 92   Definitions of Managed Objects
                                for Character Stream Devices

Stewart is on a roll 🌈 This memo defines a portion of the MIB for network management protocols in TCP/IP based internets, and in particular it defines objects for managing character stream devices. [STANDARDS-TRACK]

1315    Brown          Apr 92   Management Information Base for Frame
                                Relay DTEs

Frame Relay gets its own MIB moment ✨ This memo defines a portion of the MIB for network management protocols in TCP/IP-based internets, specifically objects for managing Frame Relay. [STANDARDS-TRACK]

1314    Katz           Apr 92   A File Format for the Exchange of
                                Images in the Internet

This document defines a standard file format for exchanging fax-like black and white images within the Internet πŸ“  [STANDARDS-TRACK]

1313    Partridge      Apr 92   Today's Programming for KRFC AM 1313
                                Internet Talk Radio

This one is a total vibe πŸ“» It's a radio-show-style "Hi and welcome to KRFC Internet Talk Radio, your place on the AM dial for lively talk and just-breaking news on internetworking." Informational, not a standard.

1312    Nelson         Apr 92   Message Send Protocol 2

The Message Send Protocol sends a short message to a given user on a given terminal on a given host πŸ’Œ This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet community.

1311    Postel         Mar 92   Introduction to the STD Notes

The STDs are a subseries of notes in the RFC series that are the Internet standards πŸ“– The intent is to clearly identify, for the Internet community, which RFCs document Internet standards. [STANDARDS-TRACK]

1310    I.A.B.         Mar 92   The Internet Standards Process

This memo documents the process currently used to standardize Internet protocols and procedures 🧾 [STANDARDS-TRACK]

1309    Weider         Mar 92   Technical Overview of Directory
                                Services Using the X.500 Protocol

If you're new to X.500, this one's your cozy intro 🧸 It's an overview of the X.500 standard for people who aren't familiar with the tech. It compares and contrasts X.500-based Directory Services with several other Directory services currently in use on the Internet, describes the status of the standard, and points to references for more info on X.500 implementations and technical details. This memo provides RFC>>>

information for the Internet community. Okay so it does not specify an Internet standard, no pressure 🫢

1308    Weider         Mar 92   Executive Introduction to Directory
                                Services Using the X.500 Protocol

Executive Introduction to Directory Services Using the X.500 Protocol πŸŽ€ This one is the executive intro to Directory Services using the X.500 protocol ✨ It briefly talks about the deficiencies in currently deployed Internet Directory Services, and then shows how X.500 solves them πŸ’– This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard.

1307    Young          Mar 92   Dynamically Switched Link Control
                                Protocol

Dynamically Switched Link Control Protocol πŸ¦‹ A project team at Cray Research, Inc. built this experimental protocol while implementing support for circuit-switched T3 services πŸ”₯ It's used to control network connections that are external to a host, but still known to the host 🧚 This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet community.

1306    Nicholson      Mar 92   Experiences Supporting By-Request
                                Circuit-Switched T3 Networks

Experiences Supporting By-Request Circuit-Switched T3 Networks 🌸 This memo spills the tea on what a project team at Cray Research, Inc. went through while implementing support for circuit-switched T3 services πŸ’… The issues discussed might not be directly relevant to the research problems of the Internet, but they may be interesting to a bunch of researchers and implementers πŸ€“ This RFC provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard.

1305   Mills           Mar 92   Network Time Protocol (Version 3):
                                Specification, Implementation and
                                Analysis

Network Time Protocol (Version 3): Specification, Implementation and Analysis ⭐ This document describes the Network Time Protocol (NTP), specifies its formal structure, and summarizes information that's useful for its implementation 🫢 [STANDARDS-TRACK]

1304    Cox            Feb 92   Definitions of Managed Objects for the
                                SIP Interface Type

Definitions of Managed Objects for the SIP Interface Type πŸ’œ This memo defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB) for use with network management protocols in TCP/IP-based internets πŸ‘‘ In particular, it defines objects for managing SIP (SMDS Interface Protocol) objects. [STANDARDS-TRACK]

1303    McCloghrie     Feb 92   A Convention for Describing SNMP-based
                                Agents

A Convention for Describing SNMP-based Agents ✨ This memo suggests a straightforward approach to describing SNMP-based agents, and it's giving clean and simple πŸ’… This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard.

1302    Sitzler        Feb 92   Building a Network Information
                                Services Infrastructure

Building a Network Information Services Infrastructure πŸ“ This FYI RFC is intended for existing Internet Network Information Center (NIC) personnel, people interested in establishing a new NIC, Internet Network Operations Centers (NOCs), and funding agencies interested in contributing to user support facilities πŸ™ˆ This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard.

1301    Armstrong      Feb 92   Multicast Transport Protocol

Multicast Transport Protocol 🌈 Okay this one is giving reliable transport that actually uses the multicast capability of applicable lower layer networking architectures πŸ”₯ The transport definition lets an arbitrary number of transport providers do realtime collaborations, without networking clients (aka, applications) needing detailed knowledge of the population or geographical dispersion of the participating members 🫢 It isn't network architecturally specific, but it does implicitly require some form of multicasting (or broadcasting) at the data link level, plus some means of communicating that capability up through the layers to the transport πŸ’– This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard.

1300    Greenfield     Feb 92   Remembrances of Things Past

Remembrances of Things Past πŸ₯Ή It's a poem! 🧚 This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard.


Security Considerations ✨

πŸ’€ Security issues are not discussed in this memo.

Author's Address πŸ¦‹

Josh Elliott
University of Southern California
Information Sciences Institute
4676 Admiralty Way
Marina del Rey, CA 90292

Phone:  (310) 822-1511

EMail: elliott@isi.edu
πŸ“¦ where this page comes from