RFC 1367
Schedule for IP Address Space Management Guidelines
Schedule for IP Address Space Management Guidelines π
Network Working Group πΈ Request for Comments: 1367 π Author: Claudio Topolcic (C. Topolcic) from CNRI β¨ Date: October 1992 π¦
It's an information memo, not a standard π and it doesn't list anything it obsoletes or updates π.
Status of This Memo β¨
This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. π«Ά
Introduction π¦
Okay so this memo suggests a schedule for putting the IP network number allocation plan from RFC 1366 into action π . The schedule is meant to support getting an address aggregation mechanism deployed on the Internet, by proposing an achievable target everyone can aim for π―. The timely deployment of that mechanism and the IP addressing plan will help with the size of the Internet router forwarding tables and with management of the IP address space π. In doing so, it helps today's Internet addressing and routing technology keep running during the interim period until the next generation technology is deployed π§. This interim solution in no way constrains the selection of the next generation addressing and routing technology π.
This draft schedule was put together by the FNC Engineering and Planning Group (FEPG) π. It's based on the IP addressing plan BOF from the July 1992 IETF meeting, plus discussions with a number (though, of course, not all) of knowledgeable and interested parties, including the IANA and IR π. It assumes the address aggregation mechanism will be available in the Internet by mid-1993 β°. The activities in this schedule are the precursors to that deployment, and they'll promote the efficient operation of that mechanism π. FEPG feels the assumptions are realistic and that this schedule can be met, so they encourage open discussion as we move toward community consensus π«Άβ¨.
Send comments totopolcic@nri.reston.va.us, or to the mailing listipalloc@nri.reston.va.usπ. To get added to this mailing list, send a request toipalloc-request@nri.reston.va.usπ¬.
Note that the references below to an addressing plan and to criteria for regional address registries refer to RFC 1366 π.
Draft Implementation Schedule for IP Network Number Allocation Plan π
- 31 October 92: The following address allocation procedures are continued π₯:
- a) Initial set of criteria for selecting regional address registries will be put into place, and requests from prospective regional registries will be accepted by the IANA.
- b) Class A network numbers are practically impossible to obtain π.
- c) Class B network numbers will continue to be issued only when reasonably justified. If possible, a block of C's will be issued rather than a B. The requirements for allocating a Class B will become progressively more constrained until the date in step (3) π₯Ί.
- d) Class C network numbers will be allocated according to the addressing plan. Allocation will be performed by the Internet Registry (IR) if an appropriate regional registry has not yet been designated by the IANA πΈ.
- 14 February 93: Re-evaluate and readjust the schedule if necessary π.
- 15 April 93:
- a) The IR begins to allocate all networks according to the addressing plan, in appropriately sized blocks of Class C numbers π°.
- b) Class B network numbers will be difficult to obtain, following the recommendation of the addressing plan, and only issued when justified π.
- 6 June 93: Expected date that an address aggregation mechanism is available in the Internet ππ¦.
References π
[1] Gerich, E., "Guidelines for Management of IP Address Space", RFC 1366, Merit, October 1992.
Security Considerations π
Security issues are not discussed in this memo. π± Bestie, that's the whole section, no cap π .
Author's Address βοΈ
Claudio Topolcic
Corporation for National Research Initiatives
895 Preston White Drive
Suite 100
Reston, VA 22091
Phone: (703) 620-8990 π EMail: topolcic@NRI.Reston.VA.US π
π¦ where this page comes from
- ietf: rfc1367 1992-10
- π girlified by claude-haiku-5-5 on : a language model's rewrite of the original, under its terms