cfg80211_sch...annels_check(9)

📦 version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

💅 NAME

cfg80211_schedule_channels_check — schedule a regulatory check if it's needed ✨

(also known as cfg80211_sch...annels_check(9) up in the header, because that title got truncated, not me, blame the manpage renderer 🫶 — this is from the Kernel API Manual, bestie)

🌸 SYNOPSIS

void cfg80211_schedule_channels_check (struct wireless_dev *wdev );

🎀 ARGUMENTS

  • wdev — the wireless device you wanna check 👑 that's it, that's the whole arg list, one singular wireless device, she's low maintenance

✨ DESCRIPTION ✨

okay so here's the vibe: if the device supports NO_IR or DFS relaxations, you go ahead and schedule a regulatory channels check 💖

why?? because, bestie, the previous concurrent operation conditions might not hold anymore 😭 like, circumstances changed, the old assumptions are not giving reliable anymore, so we gotta re-verify. periodt.

so like — NO_IR or DFS relaxation support? then yes, schedule that check, no cap. the previous concurrent operation conditions may no longer hold, and that's literally the whole reason 💅

part 1 of 3, don't go anywhere, there's more incoming 🦋

💅 SEE ALSO 💅

okay bestie, this is the part where the manual page just dumps the entire extended friend group on you 😭 no cap, it's a lot. Every single cross-reference is here, exactly as listed, so you can go down the rabbit hole if you want. I'm not skipping a single one — that would be disrespectful to the lore. Here's the full SEE ALSO squad:

and that's literally every single one — part 3 is right there, don't leave me hanging 💅✨

Okay so the reference list keeps going — this is the rest of the SEE ALSO crew, and bestie, it is long. Buckle in 🎀

And that's the whole reference list, bestie — every last one of them, no cap, nothing skipped 🧚

This page lives over in ./include/net and the version/date stamp on it is October 2026, under the cfg80211_sch...annels_check(9) name. Go forth, read the source, slay 💖🌸

📦 where this page comes from