sdma_v4_0_ring_test_ring(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’– sdma_v4_0_ring_test_ring(9) πŸ’–

okay so bestie, welcome to the Kernel API Manual β€” yes we're in kernel land today, grab your iced coffee 🧊 because this one's a little function with a big job. It's the sdma_v4_0_ring_test_ring page and it is, and I cannot stress this enough, a vibe check for your DMA engine ✨


✨ NAME ✨

sdma_v4_0_ring_test_ring β€” simple async dma engine test πŸŽ€

Like literally what it says on the tin: a simple async DMA engine test. That's her whole personality. No cap.


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

int sdma_v4_0_ring_test_ring (struct amdgpu_ring *ring );

int-returning, one-argument, extremely focused. She knows what she wants πŸ‘‘


πŸ¦‹ ARGUMENTS πŸ¦‹

  • ring β€” the amdgpu_ring structure that's holding all your ring information. this is the bestie she's testing. give her a good ring and she'll do the rest 🫢

πŸ’… DESCRIPTION πŸ’…

So here's the whole thing: she tests the DMA engine by using it to write a value to memory. Yes, using the engine to write, that's the test, that's the flex πŸ”₯ (this is the VEGA10 situation btw, iykyk).

Then she tells you how it went:

  • Returns 0 for success βœ… slay
  • Returns an error for failure 😭 not slay

That's it. That's the function. Short king behaviour but honestly the whole GPU relies on her, so. main character energy fr fr.

ok real talk β€” the return value is literally the entire result here, so please actually check it. ignoring it is giving "I'll read the docs later" and we both know how that ends πŸ’€

🌈 SEE ALSO 🌈

the whole friend group, honestly, they're all in the same file and they all show up to the group chat:


and that's the page!! πŸ“ cute lil sign-off time: this whole thing lives in ./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu and it's dated October 2026, so like, future vibes only πŸ’œπŸŒ™ go test that ring bestie, you got this πŸ§šπŸ’–

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from