sdma_v4_0_gfx_resume(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’– sdma_v4_0_gfx_resume πŸ’–

okay so bestie, welcome to the Kernel API Manual β€” yes that's the manual name, we're in the kernel docs now, put your seatbelt on πŸŽ€. This one is a page about sdma_v4_0_gfx_resume, and honestly? it's giving "underrated little workhorse". let's get into it ✨


✨ NAME ✨

sdma_v4_0_gfx_resume β€” setup and start the async dma engines

no cap, that's literally the whole vibe. setup. start. engines. slay πŸ’…


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

void sdma_v4_0_gfx_resume (struct amdgpu_device *adev , unsigned int i
);

yes the wrap is real, that's just how the page came out, don't come for me πŸ™ˆ


πŸ¦‹ ARGUMENTS πŸ¦‹

  • adev β€” an amdgpu_device pointer. that's your device bestie, the whole entire GPU situation 🫢
  • i β€” the instance to resume. not "an instance", the instance. you gotta tell it which one πŸ”₯

πŸ’œ DESCRIPTION πŸ’œ

So what does it actually do? it sets up the gfx DMA ring buffers and enables them β€” and the page is very clear that this is the (VEGA10) behaviour, iykyk πŸ‘‘

Then there's the return situation: <pink>Returns 0 for success, error for failure.</pink> that's it, that's the contract. 0 = we ate. error = we did not eat. 😭

tiny little aside from me to you: the synopsis says void and the description says it returns 0 or an error β€” I'm just reading the page back to you, I'm not the one who wrote it, don't shoot the messenger πŸ™ˆπŸ’€

⭐ SEE ALSO ⭐

the kernel file lives right here, main character location energy:

  • Kernel file ./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/sdma_v4_0.c

and the whole friend group, all of them, every single one, I'm not skipping a single bestie:


and that's the page!! πŸŽ€ one last lil sign-off so you have the receipts: this came from ./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu, dated October 2026, and it's the sdma_v4_0_gfx_resume(9) page β€” that's (9) as in kernel API manual, we stay documented πŸ’…βœ¨ ily, go resume some engines πŸ¦‹πŸ’–

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from