lpfc_used_vpi_show(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… lpfc_used_vpi_show(9) β€” Kernel API Manual ✨

okay so bestie, this is a page straight out of the Kernel API Manual and it's lowkey iconic β€” it's all about lpfc_used_vpi_show, which returns the max vpi minus the available vpi. math queen behavior honestly πŸŽ€


🌸 NAME 🌸

lpfc_used_vpi_show β€” Return maximum vpi minus the available vpi πŸ’–


✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

ssize_t lpfc_used_vpi_show (struct device *dev , struct device_attribute
*attr , char *buf );

πŸ¦‹ ARGUMENTS πŸ¦‹

  • dev β€” the class device that gets converted into a Scsi_host. it's giving main character energy, literally the whole point of the call 🫢
  • attr β€” the device attribute. not used. she's just there for the vibe check, no cap πŸ’…
  • buf β€” on return this contains the used vpi count in decimal, or the string "Unknown". so either a cute little number or a mystery πŸ™ˆ

🌈 DESCRIPTION 🌈

So what actually happens? It calls lpfc_get_hba_info asking for just the mvpi and avpi counts β€” that's it, that's the whole ask, keep it focused bestie ⭐

Here's the plot twist though: if lpfc_get_hba_info returns zero (that's a failure), the buffer text gets set to "Unknown" and the buffer length is returned. so yeah 😭 the caller must check for "Unknown" in the buffer to detect a failure. don't skip that check, i'm literally begging 🫢

Lowkey important: the failure signal lives inside the buffer, not in the return value. check your buffer, bestie. periodt. πŸ’€

πŸ‘‘ RETURN πŸ‘‘

size of formatted string. that's the return value, slay ✨


🧚 SEE ALSO 🧚

Kernel file ./drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_attr.c


and that's the whole page, bestie β€” go forth and check that buffer for "Unknown" πŸ’œ

mwah πŸ’‹ this came from the kernel source tree at ./drivers/scsi/lpfc, version vibes dated October 2026 β€” catch you in the next manpage, ily πŸŽ€βœ¨

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from