dm_test_pfli..._irq_no_crtc(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… dm_test_pflip_high_irq_no_crtc β€” Kernel API Manual (section 9) ✨

okay so bestie, welcome to the dm_test_pflip_high_irq_no_crtc(9) page in the Kernel API Manual. It’s giving β€œpflip high IRQ, but make it no matching CRTC,” and honestly? Iconic. πŸ’–


πŸ’– NAME πŸ’–

dm_test_pflip_high_irq_no_crtc β€” a test for pflip high IRQ with no matching CRTC. Yep, that’s the whole name, and it ate. No cap: this one is literally about pflip high IRQ when there is no matching CRTC. πŸ’…


✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

the function signature, exactly as she’s served:

void dm_test_pflip_high_irq_no_crtc (struct kunit *test );

πŸŽ€ ARGUMENTS πŸŽ€

  • test β€” the KUnit test context. That’s the argument on the menu, bestie: the KUnit test context. 🫢

πŸ¦‹ SEE ALSO πŸ¦‹

  • Kernel file β€” ./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/tests/amdgpu_dm_irq_test.c

and the whole related-page squad, all section 9, is literally right here:


that’s the tea, bestie: source/version is ./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/..., and the date on the tag is October 2026. This footer was serving dm_test_pfli..._irq_no_crtc(9) energy, and now you know. mwah πŸ’‹βœ¨

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from