dm_test_get...t_empty_list(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… dm_test_get...t_empty_list(9) β€” like, the whole page, bestie

okay so real talk, this one lives in the Kernel API Manual and the page header up top literally reads dm_test_get...t_empty_list(9) (yes it's abbreviated, that's just how the header prints it β€” the actual function below has its full government name, don't come for me 🫢).

This page is describing a KUnit test: checking what happens when you look up a CRTC on an empty CRTC list. That's it. That's the vibe check. ✨


🌸 NAME 🌸

dm_test_get_crtc_by_otg_inst_empty_list β€” a test for CRTC lookup on an empty CRTC list. Empty list in, lookup happens, that's the whole plot 😭


πŸŽ€ SYNOPSIS πŸŽ€

void dm_test_get_crtc_by_otg_inst_empty_list (struct kunit *test );

✨ ARGUMENTS ✨

  • test β€” the KUnit test context. It's giving "the little bag of test stuff the harness hands you" πŸ’œ

πŸ¦‹ SEE ALSO πŸ¦‹

Kernel file β€” the source lives here, obsessed with this path honestly:

./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/tests/amdgpu_dm_irq_test.c

and here's the full friend group, no one left out, not a single one πŸ’–:


ngl bestie the entire "test" here is the empty list case β€” no CRTCs, go look one up anyway, and see what you get back. That's the whole assignment. Iconic, honestly πŸ’…

sign-off szn πŸŽ€ this little page comes to you from ./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/... (the source line is abbreviated exactly like that, and yes the footer says the same thing β€” we stan a consistent queen πŸ‘‘) and it's dated October 2026, footer and all, dm_test_get...t_empty_list(9) to the very end. bye bestie, go read the source, it ate πŸ’–βœ¨πŸ¦‹

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from