dm_test_regi...valid_hpd_rx(9)

📦 version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

💖 NAME 💖

Okay bestie, welcome to the dm_test_regi...valid_hpd_rx(9) page in the Kernel API Manual. Yes, the manual name is literally that, ellipsis and all — we are not editing it, periodt. 💅

  • dm_test_register_hpd_handlers_invalid_hpd_rx — this test is all about making sure an invalid HPDRX source fails. The original description is “Test invalid HPDRX source fails,” and it ate. ✨

✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

void dm_test_register_hpd_handlers_invalid_hpd_rx (struct kunit *test );

That’s the whole signature, bestie: void, the function name, struct kunit *test, and a very dramatic little space before );. 🫶

🎀 ARGUMENTS 🎀

  • test — the KUnit test context. That’s the one and only argument, and it’s giving exactly what it needs to give. 🌸

🔥 SEE ALSO 🔥

First, the kernel file this page points at:

  • Kernel file — ./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/tests/amdgpu_dm_irq_test.c

Then the whole extended friend group of related tests, no cap:

Cute sign-off time: the source/version line says ./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/..., the date is October 2026, and the manual is dm_test_regi...valid_hpd_rx(9). Bye bestie — go make that invalid HPDRX source fail on purpose. 💖

📦 where this page comes from