dm_test_irq_...alizes_lists(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… dm_test_irq_init_initializes_lists β€” from the Kernel API Manual (yes, the whole thing is called that, slay)

okay so bestie, this page is literally about one KUnit test function named dm_test_irq_init_initializes_lists, and its whole personality is: does the irq init actually set up the list heads? That's it. That's the function. πŸŽ€


✨ NAME ✨

dm_test_irq_init_initializes_lists β€” the test that checks that irq init initializes the list heads πŸ’–


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

void dm_test_irq_init_initializes_lists (struct kunit *test );

no cap, that's the entire signature. void return, one param, very demure, very mindful πŸ’…


πŸ¦‹ ARGUMENTS πŸ¦‹

  • test β€” the KUnit test context ✨ this is the one single thing you hand it, and it's the test framework's own little sandbox for the run.

🌈 SEE ALSO 🌈

okay so there's a lot of siblings in this family, and they all live in the Kernel file:

./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/tests/amdgpu_dm_irq_test.c

go off, amdgpu_dm_irq_test.c πŸ‘‘

and then the whole friend group, in the order the page lists them:

like… that is a huge see-also list and I respect it so much 😭 every single one is a (9) kernel-API page, periodt.

so that's the whole vibe ✨ this page comes from ./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/... and it's dated October 2026 β€” anyway bestie, run your tests, hydrate, and don't forget to kunit responsibly πŸ«ΆπŸ’œ

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from