RFC 4050
Using the Elliptic Curve Signature Algorithm (ECDSA) for XML Digital Signatures
Using the Elliptic Curve Signature Algorithm (ECDSA) for XML Digital Signatures π
okay bestie, this is RFC 4050 π It's titled Using the Elliptic Curve Signature Algorithm (ECDSA) for XML Digital Signatures, and it's marked Informational, so it's sharing info rather than setting a standard. It was written in April 2005 by S. Blake-Wilson (BCI), G. Karlinger (CIO Austria), T. Kobayashi (NTT), and Y. Wang (UNCC). The header doesn't list anything it obsoletes or updates, so it's flying solo π¦
Status of This Memo
this memo is giving "for information only" πΈ It's for the Internet community, it is NOT an Internet standard of any kind, and you can distribute it as much as you want, no limits π
Copyright Notice
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005). π
IESG Note
okay this part is SO important, so read it carefully π This document is not a candidate for any level of Internet Standard. The IETF doesn't know whether it's fit for any purpose, and it's clear that it hasn't had IETF review for things like security, congestion control, or bad interaction with protocols that are already out there π The RFC Editor picked to publish it at their own discretion. So if you're thinking about using it, be careful about how much you trust it for implementation and deployment β οΈ
Abstract
this doc is all about how to use the Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (ECDSA) with XML Signatures β¨ The mechanism it describes gives you integrity, message authentication, and/or signer authentication for data of any type, whether that data sits inside the XML that carries the signature or gets pulled in by reference π₯
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2. ECDSA. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
3. Specifying ECDSA within XMLDSIG . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3.1. Version, Namespaces, and Identifiers . . . . . . . . . . 3
3.2. XML Schema Preamble and DTD Replacement. . . . . . . . . 4
3.2.1. XML Schema Preamble. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3.2.2. DTD Replacement. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3.3. ECDSA Signatures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3.4. ECDSA Key Values . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3.4.1. Key Value Root Element . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3.4.2. EC Domain Parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3.4.2.1. Field Parameters . . . . . . . . . . . 6
3.4.2.2. Curve Parameters . . . . . . . . . . . 8
3.4.2.3. Base Point Parameters. . . . . . . . . 9
3.4.3. EC Points . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
4. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
5. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
6. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
7. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Appendix A: Aggregate XML Schema . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
Appendix B: Aggregate DTD. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
Full Copyright Statement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
1. Introduction β¨
this doc explains how to use the Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (ECDSA) with XML signatures, following what [XMLDSIG] says π Here's the tea: [XMLDSIG] only defines two digital signature methods, RSA and DSA (DSS) signatures π This document adds ECDSA as one more method. Iconic π
This document uses both XML Schemas [XML-schema] (normative) and DTDs [XML] (informational) to specify the corresponding XML structures π§
2. ECDSA π¦
ECDSA is the elliptic curve version of the DSA (DSS) signature method [FIPS-186-2] πΈ It's defined in the ANSI X9.62 standard [X9.62]. Other compatible specs include FIPS 186-2 [FIPS-186-2], IEEE 1363 [IEEE1363], IEEE 1363a [IEEE1363a], and SEC1 [SEC1]. [RFC3279] shows how to carry ECDSA keys in X.509 certificates. [FIPS-186-2], [SEC2], and [X9.62] give recommended elliptic curve domain parameters for use with ECDSA π
Like DSA, ECDSA uses a hash function π Right now, the only hash function defined for ECDSA is the SHA-1 message digest algorithm [FIPS-180-1] π
ECDSA signatures are smaller than RSA signatures of similar cryptographic strength, and ECDSA public keys (and certificates) are smaller than similar strength DSA keys, which means better communication efficiency β¨ On a lot of platforms, ECDSA operations can run faster than similar strength RSA or DSA operations (see [KEYS] for a security analysis of key sizes across public key algorithms) π₯ Smaller signatures, less bandwidth, and faster computing may make ECDSA a seriously attractive choice for XMLDSIG implementations π
3. Specifying ECDSA within XMLDSIG π
this section is all about how to use ECDSA with XML Signature Syntax and Processing [XMLDSIG] π«Ά It leans really hard on the syntax and namespace defined in [XMLDSIG] π
3.1. Version, Namespaces, and Identifiers π
this spec doesn't have an explicit version number in its syntax π If a future version is needed, it will use a different namespace.
The XML namespace [XML-ns] URI that MUST be used by implementations of this (dated) specification is:
http://www.w3.org/2001/04/xmldsig-more#
Elements in the namespace of the [XMLDSIG] specification are marked with the namespace prefix "dsig" in the rest of this document π
The identifier for the ECDSA signature algorithm, as defined in [Eastlake], is:
http://www.w3.org/2001/04/xmldsig-more#ecdsa-sha1
3.2. XML Schema Preamble and DTD Replacement π§
3.2.1. XML Schema Preamble β¨
this preamble is meant to go with the XML Schema definitions in the rest of this document π¦
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<xs:schema
targetNamespace="http://www.w3.org/2001/04/xmldsig-more#"
xmlns:ecdsa="http://www.w3.org/2001/04/xmldsig-more#"
xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
elementFormDefault="qualified" attributeFormDefault="unqualified"
version="0.2">
3.2.2. DTD Replacement πΈ
To put ECDSA into XML-signature syntax, the following definition of the entity Key.ANY SHOULD replace the one in [XMLDSIG]:
<!ENTITY % KeyValue.ANY '| ecdsa:ECDSAKeyValue'>
3.3. ECDSA Signatures π
The input to the ECDSA algorithm is the canonicalized representation of the dsig:SignedInfo element, as specified in Section 3 of [XMLDSIG] π₯
The output of the ECDSA algorithm is a pair of integers, usually called the pair (r, s) π The signature value (the text value of the element dsig:SignatureValue, see section 4.2 of [XMLDSIG]) is the base64 encoding of the concatenation of two octet-streams. Those come from octet-encoding the values r and s. This concatenation is described in section E3.1 of [IEEE1363] π
3.4. ECDSA Key Values π
the syntax for ECDSA key values closely follows the ASN.1 syntax defined in ANSI X9.62 [X9.62] π
3.4.1. Key Value Root Element π
The element ECDSAKeyValue is used for encoding ECDSA public keys π¦ For use with XMLDSIG, just put this element inside dsig:KeyValue (such as the predefined elements dsig:RSAKeyValue or dsig:DSAKeyValue) β¨
The element has an optional subelement DomainParameters and the mandatory subelement PublicKey. If Domainparameters is missing, the application implicitly knows about it from other means π
Schema Definition:
<xs:element name="ECDSAKeyValue" type="ecdsa:ECDSAKeyValueType"/>
<xs:complexType name="ECDSAKeyValueType">
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="DomainParameters" type="ecdsa:DomainParamsType"
minOccurs="0"/>
<xs:element name="PublicKey" type="ecdsa:ECPointType"/>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
DTD Definition:
<!ELEMENT ECDSAKeyValue (DomainParameters?, PublicKey)>
<!ELEMENT PublicKey (X, Y)?>
<!ELEMENT X EMPTY>
<!ATTLIST X Value CDATA #REQUIRED>
<!ELEMENT Y EMPTY>
<!ATTLIST Y Value CDATA #REQUIRED>
3.4.2. EC Domain Parameters π
Domain parameters can be encoded either explicitly using the element ExplicitParams, or by reference using the element NamedCurve π§ The latter just consists of an attribute named URN, which holds a uniform resource name as its value. For the named curves of standards like [X9.62], [FIPS-186-2], or [SEC2], the OIDs of those curves SHOULD be used in this attribute, for example URN="urn:oid:1.2.840.10045.3.1.1" β¨ The mechanism for encoding OIDs in URNs is shown in [RFC3061] πΈ
Schema Definition:
<xs:complexType name="DomainParamsType">
<xs:choice>
<xs:element name="ExplicitParams"
type="ecdsa:ExplicitParamsType"/>
<xs:element name="NamedCurve">
<xs:complexType>
<xs:attribute name="URN" type="xs:anyURI" use="required"/>
</xs:complexType>
</xs:element>
</xs:choice>
</xs:complexType>
DTD Definition:
<!ELEMENT DomainParameters (ExplicitParams | NamedCurve)>
<!ELEMENT NamedCurve EMPTY>
<!ATTLIST NamedCurve URN CDATA #REQUIRED>
The element ExplicitParams is used for explicit encoding of domain parameters π₯ It has three subelements: FieldParams describes the underlying field, CurveParams describes the elliptic curve, and BasePointParams describes the base point of the elliptic curve π
Schema Definition:
<xs:complexType name="ExplicitParamsType">
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="FieldParams" type="ecdsa:FieldParamsType"/>
<xs:element name="CurveParams" type="ecdsa:CurveParamsType"/>
<xs:element name="BasePointParams"
type="ecdsa:BasePointParamsType"/>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
DTD Definition:
<!ELEMENT ExplicitParams (FieldParams, CurveParams, BasePointParams)>
3.4.2.1. Field Parameters π
okay so FieldParams is the element for encoding field parameters, bestie π¦ Its XML Schema type, FieldParamsType, is declared abstract, which means it's a base that gets extended by specialized types for prime fields, characteristic two fields, and odd characteristic extension fields. It's giving "template first, specifics later" β¨
PrimeFieldParamsType is derived from FieldParamsType and is used for encoding prime field parameters. Its one subelement is P, which holds the order of the prime field π
CharTwoFieldParamsType is also derived from FieldParamsType and is used for encoding characteristic two field parameters. It's abstract too, and gets extended by types for trinomial and pentanomial base fields. Gaussian Normal Base fields are not supported by this specification to relieve interoperability π Both specialized types share the element M, the extension degree of the field.
TnBFieldParamsType is derived from CharTwoFieldParamsType and is used for encoding trinomial base fields. It adds a single element K, which represents the integer k, where x^m + x^k + 1 is the reduction polynomial π
PnBFieldParamsType is derived from CharTwoFieldParamsType and is used for encoding pentanomial base fields. It adds three elements, K1, K2 and K3, which represent the integers k1, k2 and k3 respectively, where x^m + x^k3 + x^k2 + x^k1 + 1 is the reduction polynomial. Three k's, very main character π
OddCharExtensionFieldParamsType is derived from FieldParamsType and is used for encoding parameters of an odd characteristic extension field. It has two elements: M, which represents the extension degree of the field m, and W, which represents the integer w, where x^m - w is the reduction polynomial π
Schema Definition:
<xs:complexType name="FieldParamsType" abstract="true"/>
<xs:complexType name="PrimeFieldParamsType">
<xs:complexContent>
<xs:extension base="ecdsa:FieldParamsType">
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="P" type="xs:positiveInteger"/>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:extension>
</xs:complexContent>
</xs:complexType>
<xs:complexType name="CharTwoFieldParamsType" abstract="true">
<xs:complexContent>
<xs:extension base="ecdsa:FieldParamsType">
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="M" type="xs:positiveInteger"/>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:extension>
</xs:complexContent>
</xs:complexType>
<xs:complexType name="OddCharExtensionFieldParamsType">
<xs:complexContent>
<xs:extension base="ecdsa:FieldParamsType">
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="M" type="xs:positiveInteger"/>
<xs:element name="W" type="xs:positiveInteger"/>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:extension>
</xs:complexContent>
</xs:complexType>
<xs:complexType name="TnBFieldParamsType">
<xs:complexContent>
<xs:extension base="ecdsa:CharTwoFieldParamsType">
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="K" type="xs:positiveInteger"/>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:extension>
</xs:complexContent>
</xs:complexType>
<xs:complexType name="PnBFieldParamsType">
<xs:complexContent>
<xs:extension base="ecdsa:CharTwoFieldParamsType">
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="K1" type="xs:positiveInteger"/>
<xs:element name="K2" type="xs:positiveInteger"/>
<xs:element name="K3" type="xs:positiveInteger"/>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:extension>
</xs:complexContent>
</xs:complexType>
DTD Definition:
<!ELEMENT FieldParams (P | (M, K) | (M, K1, K2, K3) | (M, W))>
<!ELEMENT P (#PCDATA)>
<!ELEMENT M (#PCDATA)>
<!ELEMENT K (#PCDATA)>
<!ELEMENT K1 (#PCDATA)>
<!ELEMENT K2 (#PCDATA)>
<!ELEMENT K3 (#PCDATA)>
<!ELEMENT W (#PCDATA)>
3.4.2.2. Curve Parameters π¦
The element CurveParams is used for encoding parameters of the elliptic curve. Its XML Schema type, CurveParamsType, holds the elements A and B, which represent the coefficients a and b of the curve π According to the algorithm specified in annex A3.3 of [X9.62], the optional element Seed contains the value used to derive the coefficients of a randomly generated elliptic curve β¨
Schema Definition:
<xs:complexType name="CurveParamsType">
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="A" type="ecdsa:FieldElemType"/>
<xs:element name="B" type="ecdsa:FieldElemType"/>
<xs:element name="Seed" type="xs:hexBinary" minOccurs="0"/>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
DTD Definition:
<!ELEMENT CurveParams (A, B, Seed?)>
<!ELEMENT A EMPTY>
<!ATTLIST A Value CDATA #REQUIRED>
<!ELEMENT B EMPTY>
<!ATTLIST B Value CDATA #REQUIRED>
<!ELEMENT Seed (#PCDATA)>
3.4.2.3. Base Point Parameters πΈ
The element BasePointParams is used for encoding parameters about the base point of the elliptic curve. BasePoint is the base point itself, Order gives the order of the base point, and Cofactor optionally gives the cofactor of the base point π§
Schema Definition:
<xs:complexType name="BasePointParamsType">
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="BasePoint" type="ecdsa:ECPointType"/>
<xs:element name="Order" type="xs:positiveInteger"/>
<xs:element name="Cofactor" type="xs:positiveInteger"
minOccurs="0"/>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
DTD Definition:
<!ELEMENT BasePointParams (BasePoint, Order, Cofactor?)>
<!ELEMENT BasePoint (X, Y)?>
<!ELEMENT Order (#PCDATA)>
<!ELEMENT Cofactor (#PCDATA)>
3.4.3. EC Points π
The XML Schema type ECPointType is used for encoding a point on the elliptic curve. It consists of the subelements X and Y, which provide the x and y coordinates of the point. Point compression representation is not supported by this specification, for the sake of simple design π«Ά
The point at infinity is encoded by omitting both elements X and Y π
The subelements X and Y are of type FieldElemType. This is an abstract type for encoding elements of the elliptic curve's underlying field, and it's extended by specialized types for prime field elements and characteristic two field elements π
The XML Schema type PrimeFieldElemType is used for encoding prime field elements. It contains a single attribute named Value, whose value represents the field element as an integer β¨
The XML Schema type CharTwoFieldElemType is used for encoding characteristic two field elements. It contains a single attribute named Value, whose value represents the field element as an octet string. The octet string must be composed as shown in paragraph 2 of section 4.3.3 of [X9.62] π
The XML Schema type OddCharExtensionFieldElemType is used for encoding odd characteristic extension field elements. It contains a single attribute named Value, whose value represents the field element as an integer. The integer must be composed as shown in section 5.3.3 of [IEEE1363a] π
Schema Definition:
<xs:complexType name="ECPointType">
<xs:sequence minOccurs="0">
<xs:element name="X" type="ecdsa:FieldElemType"/>
<xs:element name="Y" type="ecdsa:FieldElemType"/>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
<xs:complexType name="FieldElemType" abstract="true"/>
<xs:complexType name="PrimeFieldElemType">
<xs:complexContent>
<xs:extension base="ecdsa:FieldElemType">
<xs:attribute name="Value" type="xs:nonNegativeInteger"
use="required"/>
</xs:extension>
</xs:complexContent>
</xs:complexType>
<xs:complexType name="CharTwoFieldElemType">
<xs:complexContent>
<xs:extension base="ecdsa:FieldElemType">
<xs:attribute name="Value" type="xs:hexBinary"
use="required"/>
</xs:extension>
</xs:complexContent>
</xs:complexType>
<xs:complexType name="OddCharExtensionFieldElemType">
<xs:complexContent>
<xs:extension base="ecdsa:FieldElemType">
<xs:attribute name="Value" type="xs:nonNegativeInteger"
use="required"/>
</xs:extension>
</xs:complexContent>
</xs:complexType>
4. Security Considerations β¨
Implementers should ensure that appropriate security measures are in place when they deploy ECDSA within XMLDSIG. Bestie, this is serious π In particular, the security of ECDSA requires careful selection of both key sizes and elliptic curve domain parameters. Selection guidelines for these parameters, and some specific recommended curves that are considered safe, are provided in [X9.62], [FIPS-186-2], and [SEC2]. For further security discussion, see [XMLDSIG] π₯
5. Normative References π
- [Eastlake] Eastlake 3rd, D., "Additional XML Security Uniform Resource Identifiers (URIs)", RFC 4051, April 2005. π¦
- [X9.62] American National Standards Institute. ANSI X9.62-1998, Public Key Cryptography for the Financial Services Industry: The Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm. January 1999. π
- [XMLDSIG] Eastlake 3rd, D., Reagle, J., and D. Solo, "(Extensible Markup Language) XML-Signature Syntax and Processing", RFC 3275, March 2002. πΈ
- [XML-schema] Beech, D., Maloney, M., Mendelsohn, N., and Thompson, H., XML Schema Part 1: Structures, W3C Recommendation, May 2001.
http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xmlschema-1-20010502/Biron, P., and Malhotra, A., ML Schema Part 2: Datatypes, W3C Recommendation, May 2001.http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xmlschema-2-20010502/π§
6. Informative References β¨
okay so these are the references that help you understand the spec but aren't required to implement it π€ they're giving serious reading list energy, and I love a good citation trail π
- [FIPS-180-1] Federal Information Processing Standards Publication (FIPS PUB) 180-1, Secure Hash Standard, April 1995.
- [FIPS-186-2] Federal Information Processing Standards Publication (FIPS PUB) 186-2, Digital Signature Standard, January 2000.
- [IEEE1363] Institute for Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) Standard 1363-2000, Standard Specifications for Public Key Cryptography, January 2000.
- [IEEE1363a] Institute for Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) Standard 1363, Draft Standard Specifications for Public Key Cryptography -- Amendment 1: Additional Techniques, October 2002.
- [KEYS] Lenstra, A.K. and Verheul, E.R., Selecting Cryptographic Key Sizes. October 1999. Presented at Public Key Cryptography Conference, Melbourne, Australia, January 2000. http://www.cryptosavvy.com/
- [RFC3061] Mealling, M., "A URN Namespace of Object Identifiers", RFC 3061, February 2001.
- [RFC3279] Bassham, L., Polk, W., and R. Housley, "Algorithms and Identifiers for the Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate and Certificate Revocation List (CRL) Profile", RFC 3279, April 2002.
- [SEC1] Standards for Efficient Cryptography Group, SEC 1: Elliptic Curve Cryptography, Version 1.0, September 2000. http://www.secg.org
- [SEC2] Standards for Efficient Cryptography Group, SEC 2: Recommended Elliptic Curve Domain Parameters, Version 1.0, September 2000. http://www.secg.org
- [XML] Bray, T., Maler, E., Paoli, J., and Sperberg-McQueen, C. M., Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 (Second Edition), W3C Recommendation, October 2000. http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/REC-xml-20001006
- [XML-ns] Bray, T., Hollander, D., and Layman, A., Namespaces in XML, W3C Recommendation, January 1999. http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-xml-names-19990114/
7. Acknowledgements π«Ά
the authors wanted to give a big shoutout to these people for their super helpful comments: Wolfgang Bauer, Donald Eastlake, Tom Gindin, Chris Hawk, Akihiro Kato, Shiho Moriai, Joseph M. Reagle Jr., and Francois Rousseau π they really came through for this one!!
Appendix A. Aggregate XML Schema π§
here's the whole XML schema in one place, so you can see every piece fit together π it's giving organized and I'm obsessed
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<xs:schema
targetNamespace="http://www.w3.org/2001/04/xmldsig-more#"
xmlns:ecdsa="http://www.w3.org/2001/04/xmldsig-more#"
xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
elementFormDefault="qualified"
attributeFormDefault="unqualified"
version="0.2">
<!--ECDSA key value root element-->
<xs:element name="ECDSAKeyValue" type="ecdsa:ECDSAKeyValueType"/>
<xs:complexType name="ECDSAKeyValueType">
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="DomainParameters"
type="ecdsa:DomainParamsType" minOccurs="0"/>
<xs:element name="PublicKey" type="ecdsa:ECPointType"/>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
<!--EC domain parameters-->
<xs:complexType name="DomainParamsType">
<xs:choice>
<xs:element name="ExplicitParams"
type="ecdsa:ExplicitParamsType"/>
<xs:element name="NamedCurve">
<xs:complexType>
<xs:attribute name="URN" type="xs:anyURI" use="required"/>
</xs:complexType>
</xs:element>
</xs:choice>
</xs:complexType>
<xs:complexType name="FieldParamsType" abstract="true"/>
<xs:complexType name="PrimeFieldParamsType">
<xs:complexContent>
<xs:extension base="ecdsa:FieldParamsType">
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="P" type="xs:positiveInteger"/>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:extension>
</xs:complexContent>
</xs:complexType>
<xs:complexType name="CharTwoFieldParamsType" abstract="true">
<xs:complexContent>
<xs:extension base="ecdsa:FieldParamsType">
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="M" type="xs:positiveInteger"/>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:extension>
</xs:complexContent>
</xs:complexType>
<xs:complexType name="OddCharExtensionFieldParamsType">
<xs:complexContent>
<xs:extension base="ecdsa:FieldParamsType">
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="M" type="xs:positiveInteger"/>
<xs:element name="W" type="xs:positiveInteger"/>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:extension>
</xs:complexContent>
</xs:complexType>
<xs:complexType name="TnBFieldParamsType">
<xs:complexContent>
<xs:extension base="ecdsa:CharTwoFieldParamsType">
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="K" type="xs:positiveInteger"/>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:extension>
</xs:complexContent>
</xs:complexType>
<xs:complexType name="PnBFieldParamsType">
<xs:complexContent>
<xs:extension base="ecdsa:CharTwoFieldParamsType">
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="K1" type="xs:positiveInteger"/>
<xs:element name="K2" type="xs:positiveInteger"/>
<xs:element name="K3" type="xs:positiveInteger"/>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:extension>
</xs:complexContent>
</xs:complexType>
<xs:complexType name="ExplicitParamsType">
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="FieldParams" type="ecdsa:FieldParamsType"/>
<xs:element name="CurveParams" type="ecdsa:CurveParamsType"/>
<xs:element name="BasePointParams"
type="ecdsa:BasePointParamsType"/>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
<xs:complexType name="CurveParamsType">
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="A" type="ecdsa:FieldElemType"/>
<xs:element name="B" type="ecdsa:FieldElemType"/>
<xs:element name="Seed" type="xs:hexBinary" minOccurs="0"/>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
<xs:complexType name="BasePointParamsType">
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="BasePoint" type="ecdsa:ECPointType"/>
<xs:element name="Order" type="xs:positiveInteger"/>
<xs:element name="Cofactor" type="xs:positiveInteger"
minOccurs="0"/>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
<!--EC point-->
<xs:complexType name="ECPointType">
<xs:sequence minOccurs="0">
<xs:element name="X" type="ecdsa:FieldElemType"/>
<xs:element name="Y" type="ecdsa:FieldElemType"/>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
<!--Field element-->
<xs:complexType name="FieldElemType" abstract="true"/>
<xs:complexType name="PrimeFieldElemType">
<xs:complexContent>
<xs:extension base="ecdsa:FieldElemType">
<xs:attribute name="Value" type="xs:nonNegativeInteger"
use="required"/>
</xs:extension>
</xs:complexContent>
</xs:complexType>
<xs:complexType name="CharTwoFieldElemType">
<xs:complexContent>
<xs:extension base="ecdsa:FieldElemType">
<xs:attribute name="Value" type="xs:hexBinary"
use="required"/>
</xs:extension>
</xs:complexContent>
</xs:complexType>
<xs:complexType name="OddCharExtensionFieldElemType">
<xs:complexContent>
<xs:extension base="ecdsa:FieldElemType">
<xs:attribute name="Value" type="xs:nonNegativeInteger"
use="required"/>
</xs:extension>
</xs:complexContent>
</xs:complexType>
</xs:schema>
Appendix B. Aggregate DTD π
and here's the DTD version of the same stuff, for the old-school fans πΈ
<!ELEMENT ECDSAKeyValue (DomainParameters?, PublicKey)>
<!ELEMENT PublicKey (X, Y)?>
<!ELEMENT X EMPTY>
<!ATTLIST X Value CDATA #REQUIRED>
<!ELEMENT Y EMPTY>
<!ATTLIST Y Value CDATA #REQUIRED>
<!ELEMENT DomainParameters (ExplicitParams | NamedCurve)>
<!ELEMENT NamedCurve EMPTY>
<!ATTLIST NamedCurve URN CDATA #REQUIRED>
<!ELEMENT ExplicitParams (FieldParams, CurveParams, BasePointParams)>
<!ELEMENT FieldParams (P | (M, K) | (M, K1, K2, K3) | (M, W))>
<!ELEMENT P (#PCDATA)>
<!ELEMENT M (#PCDATA)>
<!ELEMENT W (#PCDATA)>
<!ELEMENT K (#PCDATA)>
<!ELEMENT K1 (#PCDATA)>
<!ELEMENT K2 (#PCDATA)>
<!ELEMENT K3 (#PCDATA)>
<!ELEMENT CurveParams (A, B, Seed?)>
<!ELEMENT A EMPTY>
<!ATTLIST A Value CDATA #REQUIRED>
<!ELEMENT B EMPTY>
<!ATTLIST B Value CDATA #REQUIRED>
<!ELEMENT Seed (#PCDATA)>
<!ELEMENT BasePointParams (BasePoint, Order, Cofactor?)>
<!ELEMENT BasePoint (X, Y)?>
<!ELEMENT Order (#PCDATA)>
<!ELEMENT Cofactor (#PCDATA)>
Authors' Addresses π
these are the four lovely people who wrote this spec, along with where to find them π
Simon Blake-Wilson
BCI
96 Spadina Ave, Unit 606
Toronto, ON, M5V 2J6, Canada
EMail: sblakewilson@bcisse.com
Gregor Karlinger
Federal Staff Office for IT Strategies/Federal Chancellery
Ballhausplatz 2
1014 Wien, Austria
EMail: gregor.karlinger@cio.gv.at
Tetsutaro Kobayashi
NTT Laboratories
1-1 Hikarinooka, Yokosuka, 239-0847, Japan
EMail: kotetsu@isl.ntt.co.jp
Yongge Wang
University of North Carolina at Charlotte
9201 University City Blvd
Charlotte, NC 28223, USA
EMail: yonwang@uncc.edu
Full Copyright Statement β
so the legal bit: the Internet Society owns the copyright here (2005) π this doc falls under the rights in BCP 78, and the authors keep all their rights, except where BCP 78 says otherwise π₯
This document and the information contained herein are provided on an "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Intellectual Property π
the IETF doesn't take a side on who owns what IP that might apply to this tech, or whether you can get a license for it, and it hasn't done any independent digging to find out either π΅οΈββοΈ if you want the rules for IP in RFCs, check out BCP 78 and BCP 79.
copies of IPR disclosures sent to the IETF Secretariat, any promises of licenses, or the results of attempts to get a general license for implementers or users can be found in the IETF's online IPR repository at http://www.ietf.org/ipr. and if you know about any copyrights, patents, patent applications, or other proprietary rights that could cover tech needed to implement this standard, the IETF wants to hear from you, so send it to ietf-ipr@ietf.org π«Ά
Acknowledgement π
last but not least: the RFC Editor function is currently funded by the Internet Society π¦ thank you for reading all the way to the end, bestie π β¨
π¦ where this page comes from
- ietf: rfc4050 2005-04
- π girlified by claude-haiku-5-5 on : a language model's rewrite of the original, under its terms