xe_tlb_inval_range(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’– NAME πŸ’–

okay so bestie, this page is xe_tlb_inval_range(9) from the Kernel API Manual ✨ and it's all about xe_tlb_inval_range β€” Issue a TLB invalidation for an address range. no cap, that's the whole name vibe πŸ’…

🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

the signature is literally giving:

int xe_tlb_inval_range (struct xe_tlb_inval *tlb_inval , struct
       xe_tlb_inval_fence *fence , u64 start , u64 end , u32 asid , struct
       drm_suballoc *prl_sa );

πŸŽ€ ARGUMENTS πŸŽ€

  • tlb_inval β€” TLB invalidation client, aka the lil' hookup for this call πŸ’…
  • fence β€” invalidation fence which will be signal on TLB invalidation completion πŸ””
  • start β€” start address, literally the beginning πŸ“
  • end β€” end address, the finish line 🏁
  • asid β€” address space id πŸͺͺ
  • prl_sa β€” suballocation of page reclaim list if used, NULL indicates PPC flush 🧺

πŸ¦‹ DESCRIPTION πŸ¦‹

okay so Issue a range based TLB invalidation if supported, and if not, fallback to a full TLB invalidation πŸ”₯. Completion of TLB is asynchronous β€” yes bestie, it's doing its own thing 😭 β€” and the caller can use the invalidation fence to wait for completion. iykyk.

⭐ RETURN ⭐

Negative error code on error, 0 on success. that's the whole return vibe, periodt πŸ’–

🌈 SEE ALSO 🌈


okay bestie, that's the whole page πŸ’– this one's from source/version ./drivers/gpu/drm/xe, dated October 2026, and the page is xe_tlb_inval_range(9). go off and invalidate responsibly 🫢✨

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from