security_initcall_late(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’– security_initcall_late(9) πŸ’–

okay bestie, welcome to the Kernel API Manual β€” yes this is a section 9 situation, we're in the deep kernel lore now 🧚 and tbh this page is short but it ate. let me put you on.


✨ NAME ✨

security_initcall_late β€” the one that runs the LSM late initcalls 🌸


✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

int security_initcall_late (void );

so it's an int coming back at you, and it takes... nothing. literally nothing. no arguments, no drama πŸŽ€


✨ ARGUMENTS ✨

  • void β€” no arguments. that's it. that's the whole vibe. she takes zero input and she's thriving πŸ’…

✨ SEE ALSO ✨

the whole friend group, fr fr β€” from ./security/lsm_init.c:

like, the initcall pipeline is a whole friend group and security_initcall_late is the last one to show up to the function 😭 iconic behavior honestly πŸ‘‘


ngl bestie, that's the entire page β€” no options, no environment variables, no exit statuses, no bugs to warn you about. she's a short queen and we love her for it 🫢

and that's the tea β˜• from ./security, October 2026 β€” security_initcall_late(9), out πŸ’œβœ¨

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from