security_initcall_late(9)
π security_initcall_late(9) π
okay bestie, welcome to the Kernel API Manual β yes this is a section 9 situation, we're in the deep kernel lore now π§ and tbh this page is short but it ate. let me put you on.
β¨ NAME β¨
security_initcall_late β the one that runs the LSM late initcalls πΈ
β¨ SYNOPSIS β¨
int security_initcall_late (void );
so it's an int coming back at you, and it takes... nothing. literally nothing. no arguments, no drama π
β¨ ARGUMENTS β¨
voidβ no arguments. that's it. that's the whole vibe. she takes zero input and she's thriving π
β¨ SEE ALSO β¨
the whole friend group, fr fr β from ./security/lsm_init.c:
lsm_choose_security(9)lsm_choose_lsm(9)lsm_debug_enable(9)lsm_enabled_set(9)lsm_is_enabled(9)lsm_order_exists(9)lsm_order_append(9)lsm_order_parse(9)lsm_blob_size_update(9)lsm_prepare(9)lsm_init_single(9)lsm_static_call_init(9)security_add_hooks(9)early_security_init(9)security_init(9)security_initcall_pure(9)security_initcall_early(9)security_initcall_core(9)security_initcall_subsys(9)security_initcall_fs(9)security_initcall_device(9)security_initcall_late_sync(9)
like, the initcall pipeline is a whole friend group and security_initcall_late is the last one to show up to the function π iconic behavior honestly π
ngl bestie, that's the entire page β no options, no environment variables, no exit statuses, no bugs to warn you about. she's a short queen and we love her for it π«Ά
and that's the tea β from ./security, October 2026 β security_initcall_late(9), out πβ¨
π¦ where this page comes from
- nixpkgs unstable: linux-manual 7.3.1
- π girlified by deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 on : a language model's rewrite of the original, under its terms