security_init(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… security_init(9) β€” LSM framework init, bestie πŸ’…

okay so we're looking at security_init(9) from the Kernel API Manual, and honestly? Short page, big main-character energy. Let's get into it. ✨

✨ NAME ✨

security_init β€” initializes the LSM framework. That's it, that's the name, she's concise and booked. πŸ’–

🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

bestie, here's the signature exactly as it is:

int security_init (void );

πŸŽ€ ARGUMENTS πŸŽ€

  • void β€” no arguments. Not even one. The arg list is giving absolutely nothing, and we love that for her. πŸ’€

πŸ¦‹ DESCRIPTION πŸ¦‹

This should be called early in the kernel initialization sequence. Like, early early β€” that's the actual instruction. No cap. She initializes the LSM framework, so yeah, she's doing important framework setup business. πŸ‘‘

πŸ’œ SEE ALSO πŸ’œ

okay the friend group is huge and we're not leaving anyone out. The page shouts out the kernel file ./security/lsm_init.c, plus all these function besties:


πŸ’– that's the whole page, bestie! source/version: ./security; date: October 2026; page: security_init(9). mwah 🫢
πŸ“¦ where this page comes from