lsm_order_exists(9)

💖 NAME 💖

okay so bestie, lsm_order_exists(9) is giving main-character energy in the Kernel API Manual — it literally determines if a LSM exists in the ordered list. no cap, that's the whole gig. 💅

✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

like, here's the signature, verbatim, don't touch:

bool lsm_order_exists (struct lsm_info *lsm );

she returns a bool and takes a struct lsm_info *, periodt. 🎀

🦋 ARGUMENTS 🦋

• lsm — the LSM definition. that's it, that's the arg, and it's a struct lsm_info * according to the synopsis. 🫶

🌈 SEE ALSO 🌈

go snoop the kernel file ./security/lsm_init.c for the full lore, and then vibe-check these other pages too — every single one, no skipping bestie 😤✨:

• lsm_choose_security(9)
• lsm_choose_lsm(9)
• lsm_debug_enable(9)
• lsm_enabled_set(9)
• lsm_is_enabled(9)
• lsm_order_append(9)
• lsm_order_parse(9)
• lsm_blob_size_update(9)
• lsm_prepare(9)
• lsm_init_single(9)
• lsm_static_call_init(9)
• security_add_hooks(9)
• early_security_init(9)
• security_init(9)
• security_initcall_pure(9)
• security_initcall_early(9)
• security_initcall_core(9)
• security_initcall_subsys(9)
• security_initcall_fs(9)
• security_initcall_device(9)
• security_initcall_late(9)
• security_initcall_late_sync(9)

signed off with sparkles from the ./security source/version tree, dated October 2026 — mwah, love u, bye 💋🎀