scsw_tm_is_valid_x(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

🌸 scsw_tm_is_valid_x(9) 🌸

okay so real talk, we are deep in the Kernel API Manual today bestie, and this one is a tiny little function with a very specific job. no notes, she's focused πŸ’…


✨ NAME ✨

scsw_tm_is_valid_x β€” check x field validity

the whole personality is in that one line ngl πŸ’–


πŸ¦‹ SYNOPSIS πŸ¦‹

int scsw_tm_is_valid_x (union scsw *scsw );

she takes one pointer and hands you back an int. that's it. that's the whole vibe πŸŽ€


🌈 ARGUMENTS 🌈

  • scsw β€” pointer to scsw. literally just a pointer to the scsw. that's the tea πŸ«–

πŸ‘‘ DESCRIPTION πŸ‘‘

so here's the deal: this function returns non-zero if the x field of the specified transport mode scsw is valid, and zero otherwise. that's it bestie, no plot twists, no hidden lore ✨

okay but fr fr, note the specifics, because they matter:

  • it's checking the x field (not the other fields, not your vibe, not your feelings)
  • it's checking it on the transport mode scsw specifically
  • non-zero = valid, zero = not valid

lowkey iconic how much information lives in one sentence πŸ’€


πŸ’œ SEE ALSO πŸ’œ

okay this is the part where she name-drops literally everyone in the friend group, so buckle up 🧚

like I said. everyone showed up. the group chat is popping πŸ’€πŸ’–


ok that's the whole page bestie, go check the x field and slay πŸ’…

and that's a wrap, mwah πŸ’‹ β€” source lives at ./arch/s390/include/asm, dated October 2026, and the page answers to the name scsw_tm_is_valid_x(9) πŸŽ€βœ¨

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from