scsw_tm_is_valid_fcxs(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

✨ scsw_tm_is_valid_fcxs(9) ✨

okay so bestie, welcome to the Kernel API Manual β€” this little cutie is scsw_tm_is_valid_fcxs(9) and it's lowkey one of the most straightforward functions you'll ever meet. no cap. it does exactly one thing and it does it slayfully πŸ’…


πŸ’– NAME πŸ’–

scsw_tm_is_valid_fcxs β€” check fcxs field validity πŸŽ€

like, it's literally a vibe check for one single field. that's it. that's the whole job.


✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

int scsw_tm_is_valid_fcxs (union scsw *scsw );

one function, one argument, returns an int. iconic minimalism honestly πŸ¦‹


🌸 ARGUMENTS 🌸

  • scsw β€” pointer to scsw 🫢 that's your union scsw *, bestie. hand it over and let the function do its thing.

πŸ’œ DESCRIPTION πŸ’œ

so here's the tea β˜• β€” this function looks at the fcxs field of the transport mode scsw you passed in, and:

  • returns non-zero if that fcxs field is valid βœ…
  • returns zero otherwise ❌

that's the whole entire plot. no side quests, no surprises, no hidden lore. it's giving "small function, big main character energy" πŸ‘‘ and honestly? we respect it.

ngl the wording matters here: non-zero means valid, zero means not valid. don't flip it, bestie, or your validity checks will be a whole mess 😭

πŸ¦‹ SEE ALSO πŸ¦‹

okay this is the part where the friend group gets HUGE β€” literally the whole scsw extended universe shows up. every single one of these, no skipping πŸ™ˆ

like I said. the whole group chat 🌈


and that's the page, bestie!! πŸŽ€ this lil guy lives in ./arch/s390/include/asm and the version tag on it is October 2026 β€” so jot that down, drink some water, and go validate those fcxs fields with confidence πŸ’–βœ¨πŸ«Ά

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from