scsw_tm_is_valid_eswf(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’– scsw_tm_is_valid_eswf(9) πŸ’–

okay bestie, we're in the Kernel API Manual and this is the page for scsw_tm_is_valid_eswf(9). It's a tiny scsw validity-check moment, and honestly it's giving "short but important." πŸ¦‹βœ¨


✨ NAME ✨

scsw_tm_is_valid_eswf β€” check eswf field validity. That's it, that's the assignment. πŸ’…

πŸŽ€ SYNOPSIS πŸŽ€

int scsw_tm_is_valid_eswf (union scsw *scsw );

🌸 ARGUMENTS 🌸

  • scsw β€” pointer to scsw. She's just a pointer, bestie, pointing at the scsw we're checking. 🫢

πŸ’œ DESCRIPTION πŸ’œ

Return non-zero if the eswf field of the specified transport mode scsw is valid, zero otherwise. No cap: that's the whole function. It's a vibe check for the eswf field, and you get a non-zero answer when it's valid, zero when it's not. ✨

πŸ”₯ SEE ALSO πŸ”₯

The Kernel file ./arch/s390/include/asm/scsw.h is the home base, and then the whole scsw friend group is here for you:


okay that's the page, bestie! Sign-off: brought to you by ./arch/s390/include/asm, dated October 2026, for scsw_tm_is_valid_eswf(9). Go forth and validate those eswf fields. πŸ’–πŸŽ€βœ¨

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from