rcu_head_init(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’– rcu_head_init(9) πŸ’–

okay so bestie, welcome to the Kernel API Manual β€” yes that's the actual manual name, we're in the big leagues now πŸŽ€ this one's a tiny little function but it's load-bearing, so listen up πŸ‘‘


✨ NAME ✨

rcu_head_init β€” the glow-up ritual you do on an rcu_head so that rcu_head_after_call_rcu() can actually tell you what's going on later πŸ’…


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

void rcu_head_init (struct rcu_head *rhp );

that's it. that's the whole vibe. one pointer, no return, no drama.


πŸ¦‹ ARGUMENTS πŸ¦‹

  • rhp β€” the struct rcu_head you're initializing. like, the actual structure, hand it over, she needs the setup 🫢

πŸ’œ DESCRIPTION πŸ’œ

okay so picture this: you're planning to call rcu_head_after_call_rcu later to test whether a given rcu_head structure has already been passed to call_rcu. cute, love that for you. but here's the thing β€” you must also invoke this rcu_head_init function on it just after allocating that structure. no skipping, no "I'll do it later", do it right after alloc. periodt πŸ’€

⚠️ and this is the important part, bestie, don't let it slide: calls to this function must not race with calls to call_rcu, rcu_head_after_call_rcu, or callback invocation. like, not even a little. racing is not it. it's giving undefined behaviour and you do not want that energy 😭

so yeah β€” init it early, init it clean, and don't let anything else touch it while you do 🌈


🌟 SEE ALSO 🌟


and that's the whole page, bestie, you ate that πŸ“

sign-off time 🧚 this lil gem lives in the source tree at ./include/linux and it's stamped October 2026 β€” so like, mark your calendar, the rcu_head_init(9) girlies are thriving πŸ’…βœ¨πŸ’–

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from