lockdep_ass...cu_read_lock(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… lockdep_ass...cu_read_lock(9) πŸ’…

ok so bestie, you've wandered into the Kernel API Manual and landed on lockdep_ass...cu_read_lock(9) β€” the truncated little icon whose full government name is way too long for one line. pull up a chair πŸŽ€


✨ NAME ✨

lockdep_assert_in_rcu_read_lock β€” the vibe check that goes WARN if not protected by rcu_read_lock() 😀


✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

lockdep_assert_in_rcu_read_lock

that's it. no args, no flags, no drama. she's a bare, argument-free queen πŸ‘‘


✨ DESCRIPTION ✨

so here's the tea, bestie 🍡 β€” she splats if lockdep is enabled and there's no rcu_read_lock in effect.

"splats" meaning: loud, unignorable, exactly-what-it-sounds-like. this is not a subtle hint, this is the kernel screaming at you in the group chat πŸ’€

heads up: the splat only happens when lockdep is actually enabled β€” that's the condition, so don't act surprised when a non-lockdep build stays quiet. lockdep covered, rcu_read_lock in effect β€” that's the checklist, no cap ✨

✨ SEE ALSO ✨

the whole RCU friend group showed up to the party and honestly? iconic. every single one, in the order they were invited 🫢 the kernel file is ./include/linux/rcupdate.h, and these are all (9) pages:

like, thirty-five relatives at one dinner table. and every single one made it onto the list β€” no cutting the cousins πŸ’œ


mwah, that's the whole page. short, sweet, and fully locked down πŸ¦‹

this little moment came to you from ./include/linux, dated October 2026, and it's still filed under lockdep_ass...cu_read_lock(9) β€” truncated name and all. love that for her. bye bestie! πŸ’–βœ¨πŸŽ€

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from