cond_resched_tasks_rcu_qs(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… cond_resched_tasks_rcu_qs(9) β€” Kernel API Manual ✨

okay so bestie, we're in the Kernel API Manual today and this one is a whole little function with a big name πŸŽ€


🌸 NAME 🌸

cond_resched_tasks_rcu_qs β€” the vibe is: report potential quiescent states to RCU πŸ’– no cap, that's literally the job.


✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

void cond_resched_tasks_rcu_qs (void );

πŸ¦‹ ARGUMENTS πŸ¦‹

  • void β€” the icon takes literally no arguments. nothing. zero. empty set. she's self-sufficient, main character energy only πŸ‘‘ nothing to pass in, bestie.

🌈 DESCRIPTION 🌈

so here's the tea πŸ“ β€” this function is giving very much cond_resched, like, they're cousins fr fr. but there's a plot twist: cond_resched_tasks_rcu_qs is defined to report potential quiescent states to RCU-tasks even if the whole cond_resched machinery were to be shut off πŸ”₯

and why does that matter? because some people advocate for doing exactly that β€” shutting the cond_resched machinery off β€” on PREEMPTION kernels 😭 so this function is the one that keeps reporting those potential quiescent states to RCU-tasks no matter what. she shows up, she does her job, she does not care about the discourse πŸ’… periodt.


πŸ’œ SEE ALSO πŸ’œ

like, that's the whole RCU friend group right there 🫢 go read them all, iykyk 🧚


okay that's the page!! sourced from ./include/linux, dated October 2026, and you already know the manual name β€” cond_resched_tasks_rcu_qs(9) πŸ’€ byeee bestie, go report some quiescent states πŸ’–βœ¨πŸŽ€

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from