ppc440spe_init_rxor_cursor(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… ppc440spe_init_rxor_cursor β€” the kernel API manual, bestie edition ✨

okay so real talk, you're reading the ppc440spe_init_rxor_cursor(9) page from the Kernel API Manual πŸŽ€ and honestly? it's a short one. slay for us, minimalism.


🌸 NAME 🌸

ppc440spe_init_rxor_cursor β€” and that's literally it, no cap 😭 the original page leaves the description blank (just a lonely little dash), so we're not gonna invent one. we respect the mystery. main character energy is withholding information sometimes πŸ’…


✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

void ppc440spe_init_rxor_cursor (struct ppc440spe_rxor *cursor );

so you call it, it returns void (nothing back, it's giving "the journey was the gift"), and it takes exactly one thing. 🫢


πŸ¦‹ ARGUMENTS πŸ¦‹

  • cursor β€” a struct ppc440spe_rxor *. and the manpage says... "-- undescribed --" πŸ’€ yeah. that's the whole description. the docs said "no thoughts, head empty." so we're passing along the truth: the source page does not describe this parameter. not me being unhelpful, that's just literally what it says πŸ™ˆ
lowkey a moment of silence for every parameter in kernel docs that got the -- undescribed -- treatment. they deserved better. 😭

πŸ”₯ SEE ALSO πŸ”₯

okay this is the part where the page goes absolutely feral β€” the SEE ALSO section is stacked. buckle up bestie, we're listing all 70 of them, exactly as written, because we don't skip. πŸ‘‘

first up, the file itself:

  • Kernel file ./drivers/dma/ppc4xx/adma.c

and now the whole friend group 🫢:

like. seventy. 70!! the cross-referencing is immaculate. whoever wrote this SEE ALSO list was in their completionist era and we stan πŸ§šπŸ’œ


and that's the page, bestie 🌈 it came to us from ./drivers/dma/ppc4xx and the date on it is October 2026 β€” so yeah, it's technically from the future, we don't question it, we just say thank you and go read adma.c πŸ’–βœ¨πŸŽ€

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from