intel_gvt_m..._write_patch(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… intel_gvt_mmio_is_cmd_write_patch(9)

okay so bestie, welcome to the Kernel API Manual ✨ we're looking at intel_gvt_mmio_is_cmd_write_patch β€” yes the whole name, no we're not shortening it, it's iconic and it earned every character πŸŽ€


🌸 NAME 🌸

intel_gvt_mmio_is_cmd_write_patch β€” the little function that checks whether an mmio's cmd access needs to be patched πŸ‘€ literally its whole job, and honestly? it ate.


✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

bool intel_gvt_mmio_is_cmd_write_patch (struct intel_gvt *gvt , unsigned int offset );

it takes two things and gives you back a bool β€” the vibes are immaculate, the signature is right there ⬆️ no cap.


πŸ¦‹ ARGUMENTS πŸ¦‹

  • gvt β€” a GVT device πŸ’– this is the main character of the whole operation.
  • offset β€” register offset 🌟 the address-y little number you're asking about.

πŸŽ€ RETURN πŸŽ€

Returns True if GPU command write to an MMIO should be patched. that's it, that's the answer, periodt πŸ’…

bestie the True is capitalized in the source, so we're keeping it capitalized. we don't do lowercase erasure here πŸ™ˆ

πŸ”₯ SEE ALSO πŸ”₯

like, the whole mmio friend group is in the SEE ALSO and honestly they're all so valid πŸ’€


that's the page, bestie ✨ go forth and patch your cmd writes responsibly πŸ’– this was ./drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt, October 2026, and the whole intel_gvt_m..._write_patch(9) situation β€” catch you in the next manpage, mwah πŸŽ€

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from