dm_test_rep...wed_by_panel(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… NAME πŸ’…

dm_test_replay_set_caps_disallowed_by_panel β€” bestie, this one literally verifies that the panel policy gets rejected 😀✨

So the manual name? It's page 9 of the Kernel API Manual, and it's giving "tiny test, huge responsibility" energy fr fr πŸŽ€


✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

void dm_test_replay_set_caps_disallowed_by_panel (struct kunit *test );

That's it. That's the whole signature. Iconic of it, honestly πŸ‘‘


🫢 ARGUMENTS 🫢

  • test β€” the KUnit test context, aka the little main-character object that carries the whole test's vibe check πŸ’–

🌸 DESCRIPTION 🌸

okay so picture this: the panel configuration is like "nope, Replay is NOT allowed" 🚫 and in that exact situation, amdgpu_dm_set_replay_caps should return false β€” like, it has to bail before it goes accepting the capability set πŸ™ˆ

So this test is just out here making sure the panel policy rejection actually happens, no cap πŸ’… The function under test has one job and this test is watching it like a hawk πŸ¦‹


πŸ”₯ SEE ALSO πŸ”₯

Kernel file: ./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/tests/amdgpu_dm_replay_test.c β€” go read it, iykyk πŸ“–βœ¨

and the whole squad, the entire friend group of tests, all of them, periodt:


ngl the header on this page got cut off mid-name and the footer's path is doing the same thing 😭 but the source path starts with ./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/... and the date is October 2026, so jot that down bestie πŸ—“οΈ

and that's the whole page!! mwah πŸ’‹ the source/version line and that October 2026 date came straight from the footer, and the whole thing lives in the Kernel API Manual, page dm_test_replay_set_caps_disallowed_by_panel(9) β€” slay, go run your tests πŸ§šπŸ’œ

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from