dm_test_repl...ot_supported(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… NAME πŸ’…

Bestie, the header on this one literally reads dm_test_repl...ot_supported(9) β€” yes it's cut off mid-word, the man page is giving truncated main character energy πŸ’€ β€” and it's from the Kernel API Manual, section 9. The actual function behind the ellipsis is dm_test_replay_set_caps_link_not_supported, and its entire personality is: verify capability rejection ✨ periodt.


πŸŽ€ SYNOPSIS πŸŽ€

void dm_test_replay_set_caps_link_not_supported (struct kunit *test );

(Not me leaving that space before the closing paren exactly as it is β€” character for character, no cap 🫢)


πŸ¦‹ ARGUMENTS πŸ¦‹

  • test β€” the KUnit test context πŸ§ͺ. That's the whole input, that's the vibe, one single argument.

πŸ”₯ DESCRIPTION πŸ”₯

Okay so here's the tea πŸ‘‘: when amdgpu_dm_link_supports_replay rejects the link, the higher-level Replay setup helper should also return false. That's it. That's the test.

Like, both layers gotta agree, fr fr β€” if the low-level check is out here saying nope, the high-level helper cannot be saying yes, that would be a whole mess and we do not stan 😭


🌈 SEE ALSO 🌈

The kernel file, exactly where it lives β€” no guessing, this is the path:

./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/tests/amdgpu_dm_replay_test.c

And the whole squad of sibling tests β€” go read them too, iykyk πŸ’–:


And that's the page, bestie πŸŽ€βœ¨ This one came from ./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/... and the footer says October 2026, signed off with dm_test_repl...ot_supported(9) all over again β€” iconic, honestly. Go forth and reject some capabilities πŸ’…πŸ¦‹

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from