dm_test_repl...lready_clear(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… dm_test_repl...lready_clear(9) β€” like, the Kernel API Manual, but make it make sense πŸŽ€

okay so bestie, welcome to the Kernel API Manual entry for dm_test_repl...lready_clear(9) β€” yes the title is giving "my name got cut off in a group chat" energy, but she's iconic and she's here to explain one very specific little test. buckle up πŸ’–


✨ NAME ✨

dm_test_replay_set_event_already_clear β€” literally just verifying that the whole thing is a no-op when the event is already cleared 🫢


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

void dm_test_replay_set_event_already_clear (struct kunit *test );

lowkey that's the whole signature, no cap πŸ’…


πŸ¦‹ ARGUMENTS πŸ¦‹

  • test β€” the KUnit test context, aka the main character of this whole operation πŸ‘‘

πŸ’œ DESCRIPTION πŸ’œ

so here's the vibe check: when you're clearing an event that is not currently active, the function should return true without calling mod_power_set_replay_event. that's it. that's the whole test. no side quests, no extra calls, just a clean little no-op. periodt ✨

like, imagine showing up to a party that already ended β€” you don't re-decorate, you just go home. that's this test πŸ˜­πŸ’€


πŸ”₯ SEE ALSO πŸ”₯

like, the whole friend group showed up for the SEE ALSO section and honestly? obsessed πŸŒˆπŸ‘‘


and that's the tea, bestie πŸ’– this page lives at ./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/... and it's dated October 2026 β€” so yeah, she's from the future, she's mysterious, she's dm_test_repl...lready_clear(9), and she slayed πŸŽ€β­πŸ’…

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from