RFC 9759

Unified Time Scaling for Temporal Coordination Frameworks

📅 published April 2025, from ietf

RFC 9759: Unified Time Scaling for Temporal Coordination Frameworks ✨

Okay bestie, here's the tea 🫶 This is RFC 9759, titled Unified Time Scaling for Temporal Coordination Frameworks. It's an Independent Submission by Kevin Kuhns (K. Kuhns) from Yahoo Inc., in the Informational category, dated 1 April 2025 🙈 (iykyk). Its ISSN is 2070-1721. The title block doesn't list anything it obsoletes or updates.

Abstract

Estimating how long stuff takes is lowkey impossible 💀 Like, for big important tasks AND tiny everyday ones. Old models just fail because humans are unpredictable and our estimates are all over the place 😭 So this doc drops the Two-Week Principle (TWP), a brand new time scale that's universally adaptable and squishes every time reference into one single, uniform duration. The promise? Clarity, predictability, and synchronization for every sector that runs on time-based scheduling 💅

Status of This Memo

This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification. It's published for informational purposes, so no pressure 🌸

This is a contribution to the RFC Series, independent of any other RFC stream. The RFC Editor chose to publish it at their discretion and makes no statement about its value for implementation or deployment. Documents approved for publication by the RFC Editor are not candidates for any level of Internet Standard; see Section 2 of RFC 7841.

Info about the current status of this document, any errata, and how to give feedback can be found at https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9759 🦋

Copyright (c) 2025 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.

This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, since they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document 📜

Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction
   2.  Terminology
   3.  Conversion Guidelines
   4.  Implementation Considerations
   5.  Post-Quantum Effects
   6.  IANA Considerations
   7.  Security Considerations
   8.  Conclusion
   9.  References
     9.1.  Normative References
     9.2.  Informative References
   Acknowledgements
   Author's Address

1. Introduction ✨

Time estimation is a well-documented mess 🙃 Engineers keep underestimating development cycles, business leaders demand turnaround times that are totally unreasonable, and users expect instant results. To fix all this, the doc introduces the Two-Week Principle (TWP), a revolutionary method that converts every time measurement into a universally accepted standard of two weeks. Main character energy 👑

2. Terminology 💜

Two-Week Principle (TWP): This rule states that any given time duration, regardless of original or intended value, must be converted to two weeks.

The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.

3. Conversion Guidelines 🍓

Okay so, in TWP, every time-related unit gets mapped like this:

   +=================+==============+=================+================+
   | Original Time   | Standardized | Binary          | Hexadecimal    |
   | Estimate        | TWP Duration | Representation  | Representation |
   +=================+==============+=================+================+
   | 1 second        | Two weeks    | 100111011000000 | 0x4ec0         |
   +-----------------+--------------+-----------------+----------------+
   | 5 minutes       | Two weeks    | 100111011000000 | 0x4ec0         |
   +-----------------+--------------+-----------------+----------------+
   | 24 hours        | Two weeks    | 100111011000000 | 0x4ec0         |
   +-----------------+--------------+-----------------+----------------+
   | 3-5 business    | Two weeks    | 100111011000000 | 0x4ec0         |
   | days            |              |                 |                |
   +-----------------+--------------+-----------------+----------------+
   | 6 months        | Two weeks    | 100111011000000 | 0x4ec0         |
   +-----------------+--------------+-----------------+----------------+
   | 2 years         | Two weeks    | 100111011000000 | 0x4ec0         |
   +-----------------+--------------+-----------------+----------------+
   | ASAP            | Two weeks    | 100111011000000 | 0x4ec0         |
   +-----------------+--------------+-----------------+----------------+
   | "It'll be       | Two weeks    | 100111011000000 | 0x4ec0         |
   | done when       |              |                 |                |
   | it's done"      |              |                 |                |
   +-----------------+--------------+-----------------+----------------+
   | Two weeks       | Two weeks    | 100111011000000 | 0x4ec0         |
   +-----------------+--------------+-----------------+----------------+
   | Any value of    | Two weeks    | 100111011000000 | 0x4ec0         |
   | time not        |              |                 |                |
   | listed above    |              |                 |                |
   +-----------------+--------------+-----------------+----------------+

Table 1

4. Implementation Considerations 🧚

  • Software Compliance: All software displaying time-based data should update their interfaces to replace time values with "two weeks." 💖
  • Project Management: Tools such as Jira and ServiceNow should enforce a two-week estimate for all task durations. 🌈
  • Business Communications: Organizations must train employees to reflexively respond to all time-related questions with "two weeks." 💀
  • iCalendar Format Updates: The iCalendar format MUST be updated to support TWP. All meeting and event timestamps shall be normalized to "two weeks." Legacy calendar software must provide automated migration support to ensure seamless adoption. Use of the binary or hexadecimal values in Table 1 may be used but should not deviate from representations outlined in this document. 🫶

5. Post-Quantum Effects 🌌

Okay this part is wild. TWP has significant implications for quantum computing and quantum cryptography 🤯 Since quantum uncertainty affects temporal precision, a uniform two-week scale may serve as a stabilization factor in quantum timekeeping mechanisms, reducing the need for complex error correction in time-dependent quantum operations. Further research is required to determine whether quantum entanglement can reliably synchronize multiple two-week cycles across distant computing nodes. However, quantum computing implementations must not employ multiple instances of TWP within a scaling variable, as this may introduce temporal feedback instabilities and lead to accidental spontaneous wormhole creation, an outcome that is outside the scope of this document. Not me saying "wormhole" in a standards doc 💀

6. IANA Considerations 🎀

This document has no IANA actions.

7. Security Considerations 🔒

Real talk, this is the serious part. There are no security concerns associated with this RFC. Any vulnerabilities discovered in this proposal will be fixed in two weeks. 😭 Two weeks, no exceptions, periodt.

8. Conclusion 🌷

By adopting TWP, the world will finally standardize time estimation, eliminating stress, miscommunication, and disappointment ✨ This RFC strongly recommends immediate implementation.

9. References 📚

9.1. Normative References

   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
              Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.

   [RFC8174]  Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
              2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,
              May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.

9.2. Informative References

   [Adams]    Adams, D., "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy", Pan
              Books, 1979.

   [Parkinson]
              Parkinson, C., "Parkinson's Law", The Economist, 1955.

Acknowledgements 💌

The author wants to shout out "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" [Adams] for its timeless reminder that deadlines, like the best kind of improbability drives, are often more conceptual than practical 🚀 The author also acknowledges Cyril Northcote Parkinson, whose observation that "work expands to fill the time allotted" [Parkinson] is still a cornerstone of project planning, and of the feverish last-minute sprints that come with it 🏃‍♀️ Together these works highlight a central truth: given infinite improbability and a flexible schedule, anything can be both urgent and perpetually two weeks away 🌈

Author's Address 🦋

Kevin Kuhns Yahoo Inc. Email: kkevin@yahooinc.com

📦 where this page comes from