RFC 8389
Definitions of Managed Objects for Mapping of Address and Port with Encapsulation (MAP-E)
RFC 8389: Definitions of Managed Objects for Mapping of Address and Port with Encapsulation (MAP-E) π¦
okay bestie, let's get into it π here's the title block tea:
- RFC number: 8389
- Written for: the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) πΈ
- Category: Standards Track β¨
- ISSN: 2070-1721
- Date: December 2018
- Authors: Y. Fu (CNNIC), S. Jiang (Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd), B. Liu (Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd), J. Dong (Tsinghua University), and Y. Chen (Tsinghua University) π
- Obsoletes / Updates: the title block doesn't list any RFCs it obsoletes or updates π
Abstract β¨
This memo defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB) for Mapping of Address and Port with Encapsulation (MAP-E) for use with network management protocols. π«Ά
Status of This Memo π
This is an Internet Standards Track document.
This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has received public review and has been approved for publication by the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 7841. π
Information about the current status of this document, any errata, and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8389. π
Copyright Notice Β©οΈ
Copyright (c) 2018 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License. π
Table of Contents ποΈ
1. Introduction ....................................................2
2. The Internet-Standard Management Framework ......................2
3. Terminology .....................................................3
4. Structure of the MIB Module .....................................3
4.1. The mapMIBObjects ..........................................3
4.1.1. The mapRule Subtree .................................3
4.1.2. The mapSecurityCheck Subtree ........................3
4.2. The mapMIBConformance Subtree ..............................4
5. Definitions .....................................************4
6. IANA Considerations ............................................12
7. Security Considerations ........................................12
8. References .....................................................13
8.1. Normative References ......................................13
8.2. Informative References ....................................14
Acknowledgements ..................................................15
Authors' Addresses ................................................16
1. Introduction π§
Mapping of Address and Port with Encapsulation (MAP-E) [RFC7597] is a stateless, automatic tunneling mechanism for providing an IPv4 connectivity service to end users over a service provider's IPv6 network. So basically it's a way to give people IPv4 connectivity when the network underneath is IPv6, and it's giving clever engineering vibes π₯
This document defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB) for use with monitoring MAP-E devices. π
2. The Internet-Standard Management Framework π§
For a detailed overview of the documents that describe the current Internet-Standard Management Framework, please refer to section 7 of RFC 3410 [RFC3410]. π
Managed objects are accessed via a virtual information store, termed the Management Information Base or MIB. MIB objects are generally accessed through the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP). Objects in the MIB are defined using the mechanisms defined in the Structure of Management Information (SMI). This memo specifies a MIB module that is compliant to the SMIv2, which is described in STD 58, RFC 2578 [RFC2578], STD 58, RFC 2579 [RFC2579] and STD 58, RFC 2580 [RFC2580]. π
3. Terminology π
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here. These are the official capital-letter key words, so the capitals are doing real work here β
4. Structure of the MIB Module ποΈ
The IF-MIB [RFC2863] defines generic managed objects for managing interfaces. Each logical interface (physical or virtual) has an ifEntry. Tunnels are handled by creating a logical interface (ifEntry) for each tunnel. Each MAP-E tunnel endpoint also acts as a virtual interface that has a corresponding entry in the IF-MIB. Those corresponding entries are indexed by ifIndex. The MAP-E MIB is configurable on a per-interface basis, so it depends on several parts (ifEntry) of the IF-MIB [RFC2863]. Think of it as the MAP-E MIB leaning on the IF-MIB like a bestie π«Ά
4.1. The mapMIBObjects π
4.1.1. The mapRule Subtree π
The mapRule subtree describes managed objects used for managing the multiple mapping rules in MAP-E.
According to [RFC7597], the mapping rules are divided into two categories: Basic Mapping Rule (BMR) and Forwarding Mapping Rule (FMR). According to Section 4.1 of [RFC7598], an F-flag specifies whether the rule is to be used for forwarding (FMR). If set, this rule is used as an FMR; if not set, this rule is BMR only and MUST NOT be used for forwarding. A BMR can also be used as an FMR for forwarding if the F-flag is set. So, the RuleType definition in the MAP-E MIB (see Section 5) defines bmrAndfmr to specify this scenario. The F-flag is the whole vibe here, so pay attention to it π
4.1.2. The mapSecurityCheck Subtree π‘οΈ
The mapSecurityCheck subtree provides statistics for the number of invalid packets that have been identified. [RFC7597] defines two kinds of invalid packets:
- The Border Relay (BR) will validate the received packet's source IPv6 address against the configured MAP domain rule and the destination IPv6 address against the configured BR IPv6 address.
- The MAP node (Customer Edge (CE) and BR) will check that the received packet's source IPv4 address and port are in the range derived from the matching MAP rule.
4.2. The mapMIBConformance Subtree π
The mapMIBConformance subtree provides conformance information of MIB objects.
5. Definitions π
The following MIB module imports definitions from [RFC2578], [RFC2579], [RFC2580], [RFC2863], and [RFC4001]. Here comes the actual MIB module, so grab your snacks π
MAP-E-MIB DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN
IMPORTS
MODULE-IDENTITY, OBJECT-TYPE, mib-2,
Unsigned32, Counter64
FROM SNMPv2-SMI --RFC 2578
TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
FROM SNMPv2-TC --RFC 2579
ifIndex
FROM IF-MIB --RFC 2863
InetAddressIPv6, InetAddressIPv4,
InetAddressPrefixLength
FROM INET-ADDRESS-MIB --RFC 4001
OBJECT-GROUP, MODULE-COMPLIANCE
FROM SNMPv2-CONF; --RFC 2580
mapMIB MODULE-IDENTITY
LAST-UPDATED "201811260000Z"
ORGANIZATION
"IETF Softwire Working Group"
CONTACT-INFO
"Yu Fu
CNNIC
No. 4 South 4th Street, Zhongguancun
Beijing 100190
China
Email: eleven711711@foxmail.com
Sheng Jiang
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd
Q14, Huawei Campus, No. 156 Beiqing Road
Hai-Dian District, Beijing 100095
China
Email: jiangsheng@huawei.com
Bing Liu
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd
Q14, Huawei Campus, No. 156 Beiqing Road
Hai-Dian District, Beijing 100095
China
Email: leo.liubing@huawei.com
Jiang Dong
Tsinghua University
Department of Computer Science, Tsinghua University
Beijing 100084
China
Email: knight.dongjiang@gmail.com
Yuchi Chen
Tsinghua University
Department of Computer Science, Tsinghua University
Beijing 100084
China
Email: chenycmx@gmail.com"
DESCRIPTION
"This MIB module is defined for management of objects for
MAP-E BRs or CEs.
Copyright (c) 2018 IETF Trust and the persons identified as
authors of the code. All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or
without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject to
the license terms contained in, the Simplified BSD License set
forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions
Relating to IETF Documents
(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info)."
REVISION "201811260000Z"
DESCRIPTION
"Initial version. Published as RFC 8389."
::= { mib-2 242 }
mapMIBObjects OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {mapMIB 1}
mapRule OBJECT IDENTIFIER
::= { mapMIBObjects 1 }
mapSecurityCheck OBJECT IDENTIFIER
::= { mapMIBObjects 2 }
-- ==============================================================
-- Textual Conventions Used in This MIB Module
-- ==============================================================
RulePSID ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
DISPLAY-HINT "0x:"
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"Indicates that the Port Set ID (PSID) is represented as
hexadecimal for clarity."
SYNTAX OCTET STRING (SIZE (2))
RuleType ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"Enumerates the type of the mapping rule. It
defines three types of mapping rules here:
bmr: Basic Mapping Rule (not Forwarding Mapping Rule)
fmr: Forwarding Mapping Rule (not Basic Mapping Rule)
bmrAndfmr: Basic and Forwarding Mapping Rule
The Basic Mapping Rule may also be a Forwarding Mapping
Rule for mesh mode."
REFERENCE "bmr, fmr: Section 5 of RFC 7597.
bmrAndfmr: Section 5 of RFC 7597, Section 4.1
of RFC 7598."
SYNTAX INTEGER {
bmr(1),
fmr(2),
bmrAndfmr(3)
}
mapRuleTable OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF MapRuleEntry
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The (conceptual) table containing rule information for
a specific mapping rule. It can also be used for row
creation."
::= { mapRule 1 }
mapRuleEntry OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX MapRuleEntry
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"Each entry in this table contains the information on a
particular mapping rule."
INDEX { ifIndex,
mapRuleID }
::= { mapRuleTable 1 }
I'm picking up mid-table, so here's the MapRuleEntry structure and the mapping rule objects π
MapRuleEntry ::=
SEQUENCE {
mapRuleID Unsigned32,
mapRuleIPv6Prefix InetAddressIPv6,
mapRuleIPv6PrefixLen InetAddressPrefixLength,
mapRuleIPv4Prefix InetAddressIPv4,
mapRuleIPv4PrefixLen InetAddressPrefixLength,
mapRuleBRIPv6Address InetAddressIPv6,
mapRulePSID RulePSID,
mapRulePSIDLen Unsigned32,
mapRuleOffset Unsigned32,
mapRuleEALen Unsigned32,
mapRuleType RuleType
}
mapRuleID OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Unsigned32 (1..4294967295)
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"A unique identifier used to distinguish mapping
rules."
::= { mapRuleEntry 1 }
-- The object mapRuleIPv6Prefix is IPv6 specific; hence, it does
-- not use the version-agnostic InetAddress.
mapRuleIPv6Prefix OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX InetAddressIPv6
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The IPv6 prefix defined in the mapping rule that will be
assigned to CEs."
::= { mapRuleEntry 2 }
mapRuleIPv6PrefixLen OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX InetAddressPrefixLength
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The length of the IPv6 prefix defined in the mapping rule
that will be assigned to CEs."
::= { mapRuleEntry 3 }
-- The object mapRuleIPv4Prefix is IPv4 specific; hence, it does
-- not use the version-agnostic InetAddress.
mapRuleIPv4Prefix OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX InetAddressIPv4
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The IPv4 prefix defined in the mapping rule that will be
assigned to CEs."
::= { mapRuleEntry 4 }
mapRuleIPv4PrefixLen OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX InetAddressPrefixLength
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The length of the IPv4 prefix defined in the mapping
rule that will be assigned to CEs."
::= { mapRuleEntry 5 }
-- The object mapRuleBRIPv6Address is IPv6 specific; hence, it does
-- not use the version-agnostic InetAddress.
mapRuleBRIPv6Address OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX InetAddressIPv6
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The IPv6 address of the BR that will be conveyed to CEs.
If the BR IPv6 address is anycast, the relay must use
this anycast IPv6 address as the source address in
packets relayed to CEs."
::= { mapRuleEntry 6 }
mapRulePSID OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX RulePSID
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The PSID value algorithmically identifies a set of
ports assigned to a CE."
REFERENCE
"PSID: Section 5.1 of RFC 7597."
::= { mapRuleEntry 7 }
mapRulePSIDLen OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Unsigned32(0..16)
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The bit length value of the number of significant bits in
the PSID field. When it is set to 0, the PSID
field is to be ignored."
::= { mapRuleEntry 8 }
mapRuleOffset OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Unsigned32(0..15)
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The number of the mapRuleOffset is 6 by default to
exclude the system ports (0-1023). It is provided via
the Rule Port Mapping Parameters in the Basic Mapping
Rule."
DEFVAL {6}
::= { mapRuleEntry 9 }
mapRuleEALen OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Unsigned32(0..48)
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The length of the Embedded Address (EA) defined in
mapping rule that will be assigned to CEs."
REFERENCE
"EA: Section 3 of RFC 7597."
::= { mapRuleEntry 10 }
mapRuleType OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX RuleType
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"Indicates the type of mapping rule.
'1' represents a BMR.
'2' represents an FMR.
'3' represents a BMR that is also an FMR for mesh mode."
REFERENCE
"bmr, fmr: Section 5 of RFC 7597.
bmrAndfmr: Section 5 of RFC 7597, Section 4.1 of
RFC 7598."
::= { mapRuleEntry 11 }
mapSecurityCheckTable OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF MapSecurityCheckEntry
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The (conceptual) table containing information on
MAP security checks. This table can be used for
statistics on the number of invalid packets that
have been identified."
::= { mapSecurityCheck 1 }
mapSecurityCheckEntry OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX MapSecurityCheckEntry
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"Each entry in this table contains information on a
particular MAP security check."
INDEX { ifIndex }
::= { mapSecurityCheckTable 1 }
MapSecurityCheckEntry ::=
SEQUENCE {
mapSecurityCheckInvalidv4 Counter64,
mapSecurityCheckInvalidv6 Counter64
}
mapSecurityCheckInvalidv4 OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Counter64
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"Indicates the number of received IPv4 packets
that do not have a payload source IPv4 address or
port within the range defined in the matching MAP
rule. It corresponds to the second kind of
invalid packet described in Section 4.1.2."
::= { mapSecurityCheckEntry 1 }
mapSecurityCheckInvalidv6 OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Counter64
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"Indicates the number of received IPv6 packets that
do not have a source or destination IPv6 address
matching a Basic Mapping Rule. It corresponds
to the first kind of invalid packet described
in Section 4.1.2."
::= { mapSecurityCheckEntry 2 }
-- Conformance Information
mapMIBConformance OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {mapMIB 2}
mapMIBCompliances OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { mapMIBConformance 1 }
mapMIBGroups OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { mapMIBConformance 2 }
-- compliance statements
mapMIBCompliance MODULE-COMPLIANCE
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"Describes the minimal requirements for conformance
to the MAP-E MIB."
MODULE -- this module
MANDATORY-GROUPS { mapMIBRuleGroup , mapMIBSecurityGroup }
::= { mapMIBCompliances 1 }
-- Units of Conformance
mapMIBRuleGroup OBJECT-GROUP
OBJECTS {
mapRuleIPv6Prefix,
mapRuleIPv6PrefixLen,
mapRuleIPv4Prefix,
mapRuleIPv4PrefixLen,
mapRuleBRIPv6Address,
mapRulePSID,
mapRulePSIDLen,
mapRuleOffset,
mapRuleEALen,
mapRuleType }
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The group of objects used to describe the MAP-E mapping
rule."
::= { mapMIBGroups 1 }
mapMIBSecurityGroup OBJECT-GROUP
OBJECTS {
mapSecurityCheckInvalidv4,
mapSecurityCheckInvalidv6 }
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The group of objects used to provide information on the
MAP-E security checks."
::= { mapMIBGroups 2 }
END
6. IANA Considerations β¨
Okay, so the MIB module in this doc uses a couple of IANA-assigned OBJECT IDENTIFIER values, and they're recorded in the SMI Numbers registry π¦ Here's the lineup:
Descriptor OBJECT IDENTIFIER value
---------- -----------------------
MAP-E-MIB { mib-2 242 }
7. Security Considerations π
Okay bestie, this section is SERIOUS, so read it slowly π«Ά
There are no management objects defined in this MIB module with a MAX-ACCESS clause of read-write and/or read-create. So if this MIB module is implemented correctly, there's no risk that an intruder can alter or create any management objects here via direct SNMP SET operations. Iconic behaviour, honestly πΈ
Some objects in this MIB module can be considered sensitive or vulnerable in some network environments π That includes INDEX objects with a MAX-ACCESS of not-accessible, plus any indices from other modules exposed via AUGMENTS. So it's really important to control even GET and/or NOTIFY access to these objects, and possibly even encrypt their values when they're sent over the network via SNMP. These are the tables and objects, with their sensitivity and vulnerability:
mapRuleIPv6PrefixmapRuleIPv6PrefixLenmapRuleIPv4PrefixmapRuleIPv4PrefixLenmapRuleBRIPv6AddressmapRulePSIDmapRulePSIDLenmapRuleOffsetmapRuleEALenmapRuleType
Some of the MIB model's objects are vulnerable because the info they hold could be used to target an attack against a MAP node (CE or BR) π For example, an intruder could use it to help deduce the customer IPv4 and IPv6 topologies and the address-sharing ratios the ISP is using. Not okay!
SNMP versions before SNMPv3 didn't include adequate security π Even if the network itself is secure (for example by using IPsec), there's no control over who on that secure network is allowed to access and GET/SET (read/change/create/delete) the objects in this MIB module.
Implementations SHOULD provide the security features described by the SNMPv3 framework (see [RFC3410]). Implementations claiming compliance to the SNMPv3 standard MUST include full support for authentication and privacy via the User-based Security Model (USM) [RFC3414] with the AES cipher algorithm [RFC3826]. Implementations MAY also provide support for the Transport Security Model (TSM) [RFC5591] in combination with a secure transport such as SSH [RFC5592] or TLS/DTLS [RFC6353].
Further, deploying SNMP versions prior to SNMPv3 is NOT RECOMMENDED. Instead, it is RECOMMENDED to deploy SNMPv3 and to enable cryptographic security π₯ It's then a customer/operator responsibility to make sure the SNMP entity giving access to an instance of this MIB module is configured so that only principals (users) with legitimate rights can GET or SET (change/create/delete) the objects. Locking the door, bestie π§
8. References β¨
8.1. Normative References π
- [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI
10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119. π - [RFC2578] McCloghrie, K., Ed., Perkins, D., Ed., and J. Schoenwaelder, Ed., "Structure of Management Information Version 2 (SMIv2)", STD 58, RFC 2578, DOI
10.17487/RFC2578, April 1999,https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2578. π - [RFC2579] McCloghrie, K., Ed., Perkins, D., Ed., and J. Schoenwaelder, Ed., "Textual Conventions for SMIv2", STD 58, RFC 2579, DOI
10.17487/RFC2579, April 1999,https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2579. π¦ - [RFC2580] McCloghrie, K., Ed., Perkins, D., Ed., and J. Schoenwaelder, Ed., "Conformance Statements for SMIv2", STD 58, RFC 2580, DOI
10.17487/RFC2580, April 1999,https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2580. πΈ - [RFC2863] McCloghrie, K. and F. Kastenholz, "The Interfaces Group MIB", RFC 2863, DOI
10.17487/RFC2863, June 2000,https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2863. π§ - [RFC4001] Daniele, M., Haberman, B., Routhier, S., and J. Schoenwaelder, "Textual Conventions for Internet Network Addresses", RFC 4001, DOI
10.17487/RFC4001, February 2005,https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4001. β¨ - [RFC7597] Troan, O., Ed., Dec, W., Li, X., Bao, C., Matsushima, S., Murakami, T., and T. Taylor, Ed., "Mapping of Address and Port with Encapsulation (MAP-E)", RFC 7597, DOI
10.17487/RFC7597, July 2015,https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7597. π - [RFC7598] Mrugalski, T., Troan, O., Farrer, I., Perreault, S., Dec, W., Bao, C., Yeh, L., and X. Deng, "DHCPv6 Options for Configuration of Softwire Address and Port-Mapped Clients", RFC 7598, DOI
10.17487/RFC7598, July 2015,https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7598. π - [RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI
10.17487/RFC8174, May 2017,https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174. π₯
8.2. Informative References π
- [RFC3410] Case, J., Mundy, R., Partain, D., and B. Stewart, "Introduction and Applicability Statements for Internet-Standard Management Framework", RFC 3410, DOI
10.17487/RFC3410, December 2002,https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3410. π - [RFC3414] Blumenthal, U. and B. Wijnen, "User-based Security Model (USM) for version 3 of the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMPv3)", STD 62, RFC 3414, DOI
10.17487/RFC3414, December 2002,https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3414. π - [RFC3826] Blumenthal, U., Maino, F., and K. McCloghrie, "The Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) Cipher Algorithm in the SNMP User-based Security Model", RFC 3826, DOI
10.17487/RFC3826, June 2004,https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3826. π«Ά - [RFC5591] Harrington, D. and W. Hardaker, "Transport Security Model for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)", STD 78, RFC 5591, DOI
10.17487/RFC5591, June 2009,https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5591. π - [RFC5592] Harrington, D., Salowey, J., and W. Hardaker, "Secure Shell Transport Model for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)", RFC 5592, DOI
10.17487/RFC5592, June 2009,https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5592. π¦ - [RFC6353] Hardaker, W., "Transport Layer Security (TLS) Transport Model for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)", STD 78, RFC 6353, DOI
10.17487/RFC6353, July 2011,https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6353. πΈ
Acknowledgements π
okay bestie, the authors wanted to thank these legends for their valuable comments: David Harrington, Mark Townsley, Shishio Tsuchiya, Yong Cui, Suresh Krishnan, Bert Wijnen, Ian Farrer, and Juergen Schoenwaelder. π they're literally the reason this spec is so solid, no cap. π«Ά
Authors' Addresses π
here are the squad members and where to find them, iykyk π
Yu Fu π§
Yu Fu
CNNIC
No. 4 South 4th Street, Zhongguancun
Beijing 100190
China
Email: eleven711711@foxmail.com
Sheng Jiang π
Sheng Jiang
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd
Q14, Huawei Campus, No. 156 Beiqing Road
Hai-Dian District, Beijing 100095
China
Email: jiangsheng@huawei.com
Bing Liu β¨
Bing Liu
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd
Q14, Huawei Campus, No. 156 Beiqing Road
Hai-Dian District, Beijing 100095
China
Email: leo.liubing@huawei.com
Jiang Dong πΈ
Jiang Dong
Tsinghua University
Department of Computer Science, Tsinghua University
Beijing 100084
China
Email: knight.dongjiang@gmail.com
Yuchi Chen π
Yuchi Chen
Tsinghua University
Department of Computer Science, Tsinghua University
Beijing 100084
China
Email: flashfoxmx@gmail.com
that's the whole spec, bestie! πππ¦
π¦ where this page comes from
- ietf: rfc8389 2018-12
- π girlified by claude-haiku-5-5 on : a language model's rewrite of the original, under its terms