RFC 7134

The Management Policy of the Resource Priority Header (RPH) Registry Changed to "IETF Review"

📅 published March 2014, from ietf

RFC 7134: The Management Policy of the Resource Priority Header (RPH) Registry Changed to "IETF Review" 💖

okay bestie, let's start with the title block 🎀. This doc is from the IETF (Internet Engineering Task Force) and it's by Brian Rosen from NeuStar 💅. It's a Standards Track doc, dated March 2014, with ISSN 2070-1721. It updates RFC 4412 and nothing else in the title block 🦋. Tiny detail, big deal: the RFC number is 7134 🌸.

Abstract ✨

okay so the abstract is giving: [RFC4412] defines the "Resource-Priority Namespaces" and "Resource-Priority Priority-values" registries 📚. The management policy for those registries is "Standards Action" 🔥. This doc normatively updates RFC 4412 to change the management policy of those registries to "IETF Review" 💜.

Status of This Memo 🌈

This is an Internet Standards Track document.

This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has received public review and has been approved for publication by the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 5741.

Information about the current status of this document, any errata, and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7134.

Copyright (c) 2014 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.

This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.

1. Introduction 🧚

okay so this is the main plot 💅. [RFC4412] defines the "Resource-Priority Namespaces" and "Resource-Priority Priority-values" registries, and their management policy is "Standards Action" [RFC5226]. The vibe is that a doc which only defines a new namespace with its priorities, and doesn't create new protocol semantics, shouldn't be a Standards-Track document 🙈. So this doc updates [RFC4412] to change the management policy of those registries to "IETF Review" 🎀.

2. Security Considerations 🔥

This document does not introduce any security considerations beyond those discussed in [RFC4412].

3. IANA Considerations 🌸

IANA has changed the management policy of the "Resource-Priority Namespaces" and "Resource-Priority Priority-values" registries to "IETF Review" [RFC5226] 💜.

4. Normative References 📚

[RFC4412] : Schulzrinne, H. and J. Polk, "Communications Resource Priority for the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)", RFC 4412, February 2006.

[RFC5226] : Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26, RFC 5226, May 2008.

Author's Address 💖

Brian Rosen NeuStar 470 Conrad Dr. Mars, PA 16046 US

Phone: +1 724 382 1051 EMail: br@brianrosen.net

📦 where this page comes from