RFC 702
September, 1974, survey of New-Protocol Telnet servers
RFC 702: September 1974 Survey of New-Protocol TELNET Servers π
Okay bestie, this one is by D.W. Dodds from BBN-TENEXA, dated September 25, 1974. It's a monthly survey, so it's not a protocol spec. It's a status update on which hosts run the new-protocol TELNET server. The original doesn't list a category, and it doesn't obsolete or update any other RFC. π
Last month's survey got a lot of feedback that cleared up the status of a few sites, but the host server list barely moved. β¨ Here are this month's changes, in numerical order. All host numbers are octal, btw. π§
- UCLA-NMC is no longer a server π
- Host 205 is now BBN-TENEXD, a new system (BBNB) is now host 61 π
- RAND-RCC got accidentally left off the previous list π
- SDC-LAB has been temporarily removed from the list until it returns to the net π
- I4-TENEXA (117) is not a server. KI4B-TENEX (217) is, and it's been added to the list π¦
- AMES-67 fixed a bug, which revealed the new-protocol server (no options) that had been there the whole time π₯
- ISI-DEVTENEX (226) and USC-ECL (327) have been added πΈ
Here's the summary and tabulation from last month, updated. We are still very far from 100% new-protocol implementation, so let's keep pushing π
TOTAL SERVER HOSTS 34 100%
NO NEW-PROT SERVER 21 62%
TOTAL NEW-PROT IMPLEM. 13 38%
NEW-PROT ON SOCKET 27,
OLD ON SOCKET 1 (2) 6 18%
NEW-PROT ON 1 AND 27 (3) 6 18%
NEW-PROT ON 1 ONLY 1 3%
Notes π
The data came from a surveying program that ran at different times, plus a few manual checks to fill in the gaps. This report shows how the various servers behave as seen by the new-protocol user TELNET at BBNA, as of 23 September 1974. π
(2) These are the sites that are 100% correct according to all protocol and conventions, as the author understands them. β
(3) Some servers that appear here as new-protocol servers on socket 1 actually try to talk to both old- and new-protocol user TELNETs, depending on which control sequences they receive. π§
Tabulation of Server Status for All Server Sites π
HOST HOST SOCKET SOCKET NEW-PROT, OPTIONS
NO. NAME 1 27 IMPLETMENTED(IF ANY)
101 UCLA-CCN OLD X
201 UCLA-CCBS OLD X
2 SRI-ARC OLD X
102 SRI-AI OLD X
3 UCSB-MOD75 OLD X
4 UTAH-10 OLD X
105 BBN-TENEX OLD NEW I1, 3, 6; O3
205 BBN TENEXD OLD NEW I1, 3, 6; O3
305 BBN-TENEXA OLD NEW I1, 3, 6; O3
106 MIT-DMS NEW NEW I1, 3; O3
206 MIT-AI OLD X
306 MIT-ML OLD X
7 RAND-RCC OLD X
11 HARV-10 NEW X I1, 3; O3
12 LL-67 OLD X
112 LL-TX-2 OLD X
13 SU-AI NEW* NEW* I1, 3
15 CASE-10 OLD X
16 CMU-10B NEW NEW I1, 3; O3
116 CMU-10A NEW NEW I1, 3; O3
17 I4-TENEX OLD X
217 KI4B-TENEX OLD X
20 AMES-67 NEW NEW NONE
126 USC-ISI OLD X
226 ISI-DEVTENEX OLD X
27 USC-44 OLD X
327 USC-ECL OLD X
32 SDAC-44 OLD X
37 CCA-TENEX OLD X
40 PARC-MAXC OLD NEW I1,3,6; O3
43 UCSD-CC OLD NEW I0(!), 3; O0, 3
53 OFFICE-1 OLD X
54 MIT-MULTICS NEW NEW NONE
61 BBN-TENEXB OLD NEW I1, 3, 6; O3
Key to the Server Status Table ποΈ
X NO SERVER AT THIS SOCKET
I# OPTION # IMPLEMENTED INCOMING TO USER
(SERVER SAYS "WILL #")
O# OPTION # IMPLEMENTED OUTGOING FROM USER
(SERVER SAYS "DO #")
(# IS OPTION NUMBER IN NEW PROTOCOL. ALL OPTIONS
IMPLEMENTED BY ANYONE ARE:
0 TRANSMIT-BINARY
1 ECHO
3 SUPPRESS-GO-AHEAD
6 TIMING-MARK)
NOTE: SU-AI's server seems to have a minor bug. It sends an improper response to a request for option 0. π
[ This RFC was put into machine readable form for entry ] [ into the online RFC archives by Alex McKenzie with ] [ support from GTE, formerly BBN Corp. 11/99 ]
π¦ where this page comes from
- ietf: rfc702 1974-09
- π girlified by claude-haiku-5-5 on : a language model's rewrite of the original, under its terms