RFC 6958

RTP Control Protocol (RTCP) Extended Report (XR) Block for Burst/Gap Loss Metric Reporting

๐Ÿ“… published May 2013, from ietf

RFC 6958: RTP Control Protocol (RTCP) Extended Report (XR) Block for Burst/Gap Loss Metric Reporting ๐ŸŽ€

Okay bestie, this one is from the IETF, and it's a Standards Track doc, so it's the real deal ๐Ÿ’… It came out in May 2013 with ISSN 2070-1721. The authors are A. Clark (Telchemy), S. Zhang (STTRI), J. Zhao (STTRI), and Q. Wu, Ed. (Huawei). The title block doesn't list anything it obsoletes or updates ๐Ÿฆ‹

Abstract โœจ

Okay so this doc creates an RTP Control Protocol (RTCP) Extended Report (XR) Block ๐ŸŽ that lets you report burst and gap loss metrics for a whole range of RTP apps ๐Ÿ’–

Status of This Memo ๐Ÿ“œ

This is an Internet Standards Track document ๐Ÿ‘‘

This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) ๐ŸŒธ It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It got public review and was approved for publication by the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). For more on Internet Standards, check Section 2 of RFC 5741.

Info about the current status of this doc, any errata, and how to send feedback is at http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6958 โœจ

Copyright (c) 2013 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved ๐Ÿ”’

This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents, which you can find at http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info, as they stand on the publication date. Please read them carefully, because they explain your rights and restrictions for this document ๐Ÿ“– Code Components pulled out of this document must include Simplified BSD License text, as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions, and they come without warranty, as described in the Simplified BSD License.

Table of Contents ๐Ÿ—‚๏ธ

1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
  1.1.  Burst/Gap Loss Metrics Block  . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
  1.2.  RTCP and RTCP XR Reports  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
  1.3.  Performance Metrics Framework . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
  1.4.  Applicability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
2.  Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
3.  Burst/Gap Loss Metrics Block  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
  3.1.  Report Block Structure  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
  3.2.  Definition of Fields in Burst/Gap Loss Metrics Block  . .   5
  3.3.  Derived Metrics Based on Reported Metrics . . . . . . . .   7
4.  Considerations for Voice-over-IP Applications . . . . . . . .   8
5.  SDP Signaling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   9
  5.1.  SDP rtcp-xr-attrib Attribute Extension  . . . . . . . . .   9
  5.2.  Offer/Answer Usage  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   9
6.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   9
  6.1.  New RTCP XR Block Type Value  . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   9
  6.2.  New RTCP XR SDP Parameter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   9
  6.3.  Contact Information for Registrations . . . . . . . . . .  10
7.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  10
8.  Contributors  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  10
9.  Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  10
10. References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  11
  10.1.  Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  11
  10.2.  Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  11
Appendix A.  Metrics Represented Using the Template from RFC 6390  13

1. Introduction โœจ

1.1. Burst/Gap Loss Metrics Block ๐ŸŽ€

Okay so this doc adds a brand new block type on top of the ones from [RFC3611] for use in a range of RTP apps ๐Ÿฆ‹ The new block type lets you report the proportion of packets the network lost ๐Ÿ“‰ It reports the losses during loss bursts, along with the number of bursts and some extra data, so you can work out statistical parameters (mean and variance) for the distribution of burst lengths ๐Ÿงฎ Some of these metrics depend on having the "cumulative number of packets lost" metric from RTCP [RFC3550] available ๐Ÿ’…

This block gives you info on transient IP problems ๐ŸŒช๏ธ Burst/gap metrics are typically used in Cumulative reports, but they also may be used in Interval reports. The burstiness of packet loss affects user experience, may influence any sender strategies to mitigate the problem, and may also have diagnostic value ๐Ÿ”

The metric belongs to the class of transport-related end system metrics defined in [RFC6792] ๐Ÿงš

The definitions of "burst", "gap", "loss", and "discard" are consistent with the definitions in [RFC3611] ๐Ÿ’– To handle the range of jitter buffer algorithms and packet discard logic that implementors might use, the method used to tell bursts and gaps apart may be an equivalent method to the one defined in [RFC3611]. The method used should produce the same result as the one defined in [RFC3611] for conditions of burst packet loss, but it may produce different results for conditions of time-varying jitter ๐ŸŒˆ

1.2. RTCP and RTCP XR Reports ๐Ÿ“ฆ

RTCP reporting is defined in [RFC3550]. [RFC3611] defines an extensible structure for reporting by using an RTCP Extended Report (XR). This document defines a new Extended Report block for use with [RFC3550] and [RFC3611] ๐Ÿซถ

1.3. Performance Metrics Framework ๐Ÿ“Š

The Performance Metrics Framework [RFC6390] gives guidance on defining and specifying performance metrics ๐Ÿ“ The "Guidelines for Use of the RTP Monitoring Framework" [RFC6792] gives guidelines for reporting block format using RTCP XR ๐ŸŽ€ The Metrics Block described in this document follows the guidelines in [RFC6390] and [RFC6792] โœจ

1.4. Applicability ๐ŸŒธ

These metrics apply to a range of RTP apps that have jitter buffers and don't use stream repair means, e.g., Forward Error Correction (FEC) [RFC5109] and/or retransmission [RFC4588] ๐Ÿงธ

2. Terminology ๐Ÿ“š

The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119] ๐Ÿ”‘

Beyond that, these terms are defined too ๐Ÿ’…

Received, Lost, and Discarded

A packet shall be regarded as lost if it fails to arrive within an implementation-specific time window. A packet that arrives within this time window but is too early or late to be played out or thrown away before playout, due to packet duplication or redundancy, shall be regarded as discarded. A packet shall be classified as one of received (or OK), discarded, or lost ๐Ÿซ  The metric "cumulative number of packets lost" defined in [RFC3550] reports a count of packets lost from the media stream (single Synchronization Source (SSRC) within a single RTP session). Similarly, the metric "number of packets discarded" defined in [DISCARD] reports a count of packets discarded from the media stream (single SSRC within single RTP session) arriving at the receiver. The post-repair Loss RLE metric, defined in [RFC5725], can be used to report the number of packets that aren't recovered by any repair techniques in use ๐Ÿฉน

Bursts and Gaps

The terms "burst" and "gap" are used the same way as in RTCP XR [RFC3611] ๐Ÿ’œ RTCP XR views an RTP stream as being divided into bursts, which are periods when the loss rate is high enough to cause noticeable quality degradation (generally over a 5 percent loss rate), and gaps, which are periods when lost packets are infrequent and quality is generally acceptable ๐ŸŒค๏ธ

3. Burst/Gap Loss Metrics Block ๐Ÿฆ‹

Metrics in this block report on burst/gap loss in the stream arriving at the RTP system. The measurement of these metrics is made at the receiving end of the RTP stream. Each instance of this Metrics Block refers by SSRC to a separate auxiliary Measurement Information Block [RFC6776], which describes the measurement periods in use (see RFC 6776, Section 4.2) ๐Ÿ“

This Metrics Block relies on the measurement period in the Measurement Information Block to indicate the span of the report. Senders MUST send this block in the same compound RTCP packet as the Measurement Information Block. Receivers MUST verify that the measurement period is received in the same compound RTCP packet as this Metrics Block. If not, this Metrics Block MUST be discarded ๐Ÿšซ

3.1. Report Block Structure ๐Ÿงฑ

The structure of the Burst/Gap Loss Metrics Block is as follows ๐Ÿ‘‡

    0                   1                   2                   3
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |     BT=20     | I |C|  resv.  |      Block Length = 5         |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                        SSRC of Source                         |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   | Threshold     |         Sum of Burst Durations (ms)           |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |            Packets Lost in Bursts             |    Total...   |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   | ...Packets Expected in Bursts |    Number of Bursts   | Sum of|
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                ...Squares of Burst Durations (ms-squared)     |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Figure 1: Report Block Structure ๐ŸŒท

That's part 1 wrapped up, bestie! Part 2 picks up at Section 3.2 ๐Ÿ’–โœจ

3.2. Definition of Fields in Burst/Gap Loss Metrics Block โœจ

Block Type (BT): 8 bits ๐ŸŽ€

okay so the Block Type is 8 bits, and a Burst/Gap Loss Metrics Block is identified by the constant 20. that's its ID card ๐Ÿชช๐Ÿ’–

Interval Metric flag (I): 2 bits ๐Ÿฆ‹

this field tells you whether the burst/gap loss metrics are Sampled, Interval, or Cumulative metrics:

  • I=10: Interval Duration - the reported value applies to the most recent measurement interval duration between successive metrics reports.
  • I=11: Cumulative Duration - the reported value applies to the accumulation period characteristic of cumulative measurements.
  • I=01: Sampled Value - the reported value is a sampled instantaneous value.

ok so in this document, burst/gap loss metrics can only be measured over definite intervals and cannot be sampled ๐Ÿ™…โ€โ™€๏ธ also I=00 is reserved for future use. senders MUST NOT use the values I=00 or I=01. if a block is received with I=00 or I=01, the receiver MUST discard the block. no exceptions, bestie ๐Ÿ’…

Loss and Discard Combination flag (C): 1 bit ๐Ÿ“

the 'C' flag tells you whether the loss/discard report is combined with the burst/gap loss report in the same compound RTCP packet. it's set to 1 if the loss/discard report and the burst gap loss report are combined. otherwise, it's set to 0. if the 'C' flag is set to 1 but the burst/gap discard was not sent, the receiver MUST discard the burst/gap loss. the way that rule protects the receiver is iconic ๐Ÿ˜ญโœจ

Reserved (resv.): 5 bits ๐ŸŒธ

these bits are reserved. they MUST be set to zero by senders and ignored by receivers (see [RFC6709], Section 4.2). zero it out, periodt ๐Ÿซถ

Block Length: 16 bits ๐Ÿงš

this is the length of this report block in 32-bit words, minus one. for the Burst/Gap Loss Metrics Block, the block length is equal to 5. the block MUST be discarded if the block length is set to a different value. wrong length = gone ๐Ÿ’€

SSRC of Source: 32 bits ๐Ÿ’œ

as defined in Section 4.1 of [RFC3611].

Threshold: 8 bits ๐ŸŒˆ

the Threshold is equivalent to Gmin in [RFC3611], i.e., the number of successive packets that must be received prior to and following a lost packet in order for this lost packet to be regarded as part of a gap. note that the threshold is calculated in accordance with the Gmin Calculation defined in Section 4.7.2 of RFC 3611. this is the number that decides what counts as a gap, so it's a whole main character moment ๐Ÿ‘‘

Sum of Burst Durations (ms): 24 bits โญ

this is the total duration of bursts of lost packets in the period of the report (Interval or Cumulative).

the measured value is an unsigned value. if the measured value exceeds 0xFFFFFD, the value 0xFFFFFE MUST be reported to indicate an over-range measurement. if the measurement is unavailable, the value 0xFFFFFF MUST be reported. over-range has its own special code, which is so extra ๐Ÿ™ˆ

Packets Lost in Bursts: 24 bits ๐Ÿ”ฅ

this is the total number of packets lost during loss bursts.

the measured value is an unsigned value. if the measured value exceeds 0xFFFFFD, the value 0xFFFFFE MUST be reported to indicate an over-range measurement. if the measurement is unavailable, the value 0xFFFFFF MUST be reported.

Total Packets Expected in Bursts: 24 bits ๐Ÿฆ‹

this is the total number of packets expected during loss bursts (that is, the sum of received packets and lost packets).

the measured value is an unsigned value. if the measured value exceeds 0xFFFFFD, the value 0xFFFFFE MUST be reported to indicate an over-range measurement. if the measurement is unavailable, the value 0xFFFFFF MUST be reported.

Number of Bursts: 16 bits ๐Ÿ’…

this is the number of bursts in the period of the report (Interval or Cumulative).

the measured value is an unsigned value. if the measured value exceeds 0xFFFD, the value 0xFFFE MUST be reported to indicate an over-range measurement. if the measurement is unavailable, the value 0xFFFF MUST be reported.

Sum of Squares of Burst Durations (ms-squared): 36 bits ๐ŸŒŸ

this is the sum of the squares of burst durations (where individual burst durations are expressed in ms) in the period of the report (Interval or Cumulative). the units for this quantity are milliseconds-squared. the math is giving big brain energy ๐Ÿง ๐Ÿ’–

the measured value is an unsigned value. if the measured value exceeds 0xFFFFFFFFD, the value 0xFFFFFFFFE MUST be reported to indicate an over-range measurement. if the measurement is unavailable, the value 0xFFFFFFFFF MUST be reported.


3.3. Derived Metrics Based on Reported Metrics ๐Ÿ”ฎ

okay bestie, these metrics are meant to be used the way this section describes, together with information from the Measurement Information Block [RFC6776] and also with the metric "cumulative number of packets lost" provided in standard RTCP [RFC3550] ๐Ÿงš

these metrics give you info for statistical parameters, including:

  • the fraction of packets lost during bursts (i.e., Burst Loss Rate in [SUMSTAT]), which can be calculated using the metric "Packets Loss in Bursts" and the metric "Total Packets Expected in Bursts" provided in the Burst/Gap Loss Metrics Block.
  • the fraction of packets lost during gaps (i.e., Gap Loss Rate in [SUMSTAT]), which can be calculated using the metric "Packets Loss in Bursts" and the metric "Total Packets Expected in Bursts" provided in the Burst/Gap Loss Metrics Block.
  • burst duration mean [SUMSTAT], which can be calculated using the metric "Packets Loss in Bursts" and the metric "Total Packets Expected in Bursts" provided in the Burst/Gap Loss Metrics Block.
  • burst duration variance [SUMSTAT], which can be calculated using the metric "Packets Loss in Bursts" and the metric "Total Packets Expected in Bursts" provided in the Burst/Gap Loss Metrics Block.

the details on calculation of these parameters are described in [SUMSTAT] ๐Ÿ“šโœจ


4. Considerations for Voice-over-IP Applications ๐Ÿ“ž

this Metrics Block is applicable to a broad range of RTP applications ๐ŸŒ where the metric is used with a Voice-over-IP (VoIP) application and the stream repair means is not available, the following considerations apply.

RTCP XR views a call as being divided into bursts, which are periods when the loss rate is high enough to cause noticeable call quality degradation (generally over 5 percent loss rate), and gaps, which are periods when lost packets are infrequent and hence call quality is generally acceptable. so bursts are the rough patches and gaps are the vibes are good zones ๐Ÿฅน

if Voice Activity Detection is used, the Burst and Gap Durations shall be determined as if silence packets had been sent, i.e., a period of silence in excess of Gmin packets will terminate a burst condition. silence counts too, bestie ๐Ÿคซ

the recommended value for the threshold Gmin in [RFC3611] causes a burst during which the call quality is degraded to a similar extent as it would be during a typical Pulse Code Modulation (PCM) Severely Errored Second ๐Ÿ“‰๐Ÿ’€


5. SDP Signaling ๐Ÿ“

[RFC3611] defines the use of the Session Description Protocol (SDP) [RFC4566] for signaling the use of XR blocks. XR blocks MAY be used without prior signaling. optional but iconic ๐ŸŒธ

5.1. SDP rtcp-xr-attrib Attribute Extension ๐ŸŽ€

this section augments the SDP [RFC4566] attribute "rtcp-xr" defined in [RFC3611] by providing an additional value of "xr-format" to signal the use of the report block defined in this document. the ABNF [RFC5234] syntax is below. ๐Ÿ”ค

xr-format =/ xr-bgl-block

xr-bgl-block = "burst-gap-loss"

5.2. Offer/Answer Usage ๐Ÿค

when SDP is used in the offer/answer context, the SDP Offer/Answer usage defined in [RFC3611] for unilateral "rtcp-xr" attribute parameters applies. for detailed usage of offer/answer for unilateral parameters, refer to Section 5.2 of [RFC3611].


6. IANA Considerations ๐Ÿ›๏ธ

new block types for RTCP XR are subject to IANA registration. for general guidelines on IANA considerations for RTCP XR, refer to [RFC3611] ๐Ÿ“‹

6.1. New RTCP XR Block Type Value ๐Ÿ”ข

this document assigns the block type value 20 in the IANA "RTP Control Protocol Extended Reports (RTCP XR) Block Type Registry" to the "Burst/Gap Loss Metrics Block". โœจ

6.2. New RTCP XR SDP Parameter ๐ŸŒท

this document also registers a new parameter "burst-gap-loss" in the "RTP Control Protocol Extended Reports (RTCP XR) Session Description Protocol (SDP) Parameters Registry". ๐Ÿ’œ

6.3. Contact Information for Registrations ๐Ÿ“ฌ

the contact information for the registrations is:

Qin Wu (sunseawq@huawei.com)

101 Software Avenue, Yuhua District
Nanjing, Jiangsu  210012
China

7. Security Considerations ๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿ”

this part is SERIOUS, bestie. read it carefully ๐Ÿ™ˆ

this block does not provide per-packet statistics, so the risk to confidentiality documented in Section 7, paragraph 3 of [RFC3611] does not apply. however, the gaps indicated within this block could be used to detect the timing of other events on the path between the sender and receiver. for example, a competing multimedia stream might cause a loss burst for the duration of the stream, allowing the receiver of this block to know when the competing stream was active. this risk is not a significant threat since the only information leaked is the timing of the loss, not the cause. besides this, it is believed that this proposed RTCP XR report block introduces no other new security considerations beyond those described in [RFC3611]. so yeah, timing leaks are the main thing to keep an eye on ๐Ÿ‘€


8. Contributors ๐Ÿซถ

Geoff Hunt wrote the initial draft of this document. the OG ๐Ÿ†


9. Acknowledgments ๐Ÿ’

the authors gratefully acknowledge reviews and feedback provided by Bruce Adams, Philip Arden, Amit Arora, Bob Biskner, Kevin Connor, Claus Dahm, Randy Ethier, Roni Even, Jim Frauenthal, Albert Higashi, Tom Hock, Shane Holthaus, Paul Jones, Rajesh Kumar, Keith Lantz, Mohamed Mostafa, Amy Pendleton, Colin Perkins, Mike Ramalho, Ravi Raviraj, Albrecht Schwarz, Tom Taylor, Hideaki Yamada, Adam Roach, Dan Romascanu, Chris Lonvick, Alfred C. Morton Jr., Pete Resnick, Ted Lemon, Stephen Farrell, Richard Barnes, and Benoit Claise. the whole squad ๐Ÿฅฐ๐Ÿ‘‘


10. References ๐Ÿ“š

10.1. Normative References ๐ŸŒŸ

[RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
              Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.

[RFC3550]  Schulzrinne, H., Casner, S., Frederick, R., and V.
              Jacobson, "RTP: A Transport Protocol for Real-Time
              Applications", STD 64, RFC 3550, July 2003.

[RFC3611]  Friedman, T., Caceres, R., and A. Clark, "RTP Control
              Protocol Extended Reports (RTCP XR)", RFC 3611, November
              2003.

[RFC4566]  Handley, M., Jacobson, V., and C. Perkins, "SDP: Session
              Description Protocol", RFC 4566, July 2006.

[RFC5234]  Crocker, D. and P. Overell, "Augmented BNF for Syntax
              Specifications: ABNF", STD 68, RFC 5234, January 2008.

[RFC5725]  Begen, A., Hsu, D., and M. Lague, "Post-Repair Loss RLE
              Report Block Type for RTP Control Protocol (RTCP) Extended
              Reports (XRs)", RFC 5725, February 2010.

10.2. Informative References ๐Ÿ“š

  • [DISCARD] Clark, A., Huang, R., and Q. Wu, Ed., "RTP Control Protocol (RTCP) Extended Report (XR) Block for Discard Count metric Reporting", Work in Progress, April 2013. ๐Ÿ’œ
  • [RFC4588] Rey, J., Leon, D., Miyazaki, A., Varsa, V., and R. Hakenberg, "RTP Retransmission Payload Format", RFC 4588, July 2006. ๐Ÿ”
  • [RFC5109] Li, A., "RTP Payload Format for Generic Forward Error Correction", RFC 5109, December 2007. ๐Ÿ›ก๏ธ
  • [RFC6390] Clark, A. and B. Claise, "Guidelines for Considering New Performance Metric Development", BCP 170, RFC 6390, October 2011. ๐Ÿ“
  • [RFC6709] Carpenter, B., Aboba, B., and S. Cheshire, "Design Considerations for Protocol Extensions", RFC 6709, September 2012. ๐Ÿงฉ
  • [RFC6776] Clark, A. and Q. Wu, "Measurement Identity and Information Reporting Using a Source Description (SDES) Item and an RTCP Extended Report (XR) Block", RFC 6776, October 2012. ๐Ÿชช
  • [RFC6792] Wu, Q., Hunt, G., and P. Arden, "Guidelines for Use of the RTP Monitoring Framework", RFC 6792, November 2012. ๐Ÿ‘€
  • [SUMSTAT] Zorn, G., Schott, R., Wu, Q., Ed., and R. Huang, "RTP Control Protocol (RTCP) Extended Report (XR) Blocks for Summary Statistics Metrics Reporting", Work in Progress, March 2013. ๐Ÿ“Š

Appendix A. Metrics Represented Using the Template from RFC 6390 โœจ

The six metrics defined in this document are described below using the template from Section 5.4.4 of RFC 6390. It's the same template every time, so it's super easy to compare them side by side. ๐ŸŽ€

a. Threshold Metric ๐ŸŒธ

  • Metric Name: Threshold in RTP
  • Metric Description: The Threshold is equivalent to Gmin in [RFC3611], i.e., the number of successive RTP packets that must be received prior to and following a lost RTP packet in order for this lost RTP packet to be regarded as part of a gap.
  • Method of Measurement or Calculation: See Section 3.2, Threshold definition.
  • Units of Measurement: See Section 3.2, Threshold definition.
  • Measurement Point(s) with Potential Measurement Domain: See Section 3, 1st paragraph.
  • Measurement Timing: See Section 3, 2nd paragraph for measurement timing and Section 3.2 for Interval Metric flag.
  • Use and Applications: See Section 1.4.
  • Reporting Model: See RFC 3611.

b. Sum of Burst Durations Metric ๐Ÿฆ‹

  • Metric Name: Sum of Burst Durations in RTP
  • Metric Description: The total duration of bursts of lost RTP packets in the period of the report.
  • Method of Measurement or Calculation: See Section 3.2, Sum of Burst Durations definition.
  • Units of Measurement: See Section 3.2, Sum of Burst Durations definition.
  • Measurement Point(s) with Potential Measurement Domain: See Section 3, 1st paragraph.
  • Measurement Timing: See Section 3, 2nd paragraph for measurement timing and Section 3.2 for Interval Metric flag.
  • Use and Applications: See Section 1.4.
  • Reporting Model: See RFC 3611.

c. Packets Lost in Bursts Metric ๐Ÿ’…

  • Metric Name: RTP Packets lost in bursts
  • Metric Description: The total number of RTP packets lost during loss bursts.
  • Method of Measurement or Calculation: See Section 3.2, Packets Lost in Bursts definition.
  • Units of Measurement: See Section 3.2, Packets lost in bursts definition.
  • Measurement Point(s) with Potential Measurement Domain: See Section 3, 1st paragraph.
  • Measurement Timing: See Section 3, 2nd paragraph for measurement timing and Section 3.2 for Interval Metric flag.
  • Use and Applications: See Section 1.4.
  • Reporting Model: See RFC 3611.

d. Total Packets Expected in Bursts Metric ๐Ÿงš

  • Metric Name: Total RTP packets expected in bursts
  • Metric Description: The total number of RTP packets expected during loss bursts (that is, the sum of received RTP packets and lost RTP packets).
  • Method of Measurement or Calculation: See Section 3.2, Total packets expected in bursts definition.
  • Units of Measurement: See Section 3.2, Total packets expected in bursts definition.
  • Measurement Point(s) with Potential Measurement Domain: See Section 3, 1st paragraph.
  • Measurement Timing: See Section 3, 2nd paragraph for measurement timing and Section 3.2 for Interval Metric flag.
  • Use and Applications: See Section 1.4.
  • Reporting Model: See RFC 3611.

e. Number of Bursts Metric ๐Ÿ“

  • Metric Name: Number of bursts in RTP
  • Metric Description: The total duration of bursts of lost RTP packets in the period of the report.
  • Method of Measurement or Calculation: See Section 3.2, Number of bursts definition.
  • Units of Measurement: See Section 3.2, Number of bursts definition.
  • Measurement Point(s) with Potential Measurement Domain: See Section 3, 1st paragraph.
  • Measurement Timing: See Section 3, 2nd paragraph for measurement timing and Section 3.2 for Interval Metric flag.
  • Use and Applications: See Section 1.4.
  • Reporting Model: See RFC 3611.

f. Sum of Squares of Burst Durations Metric ๐Ÿ‘‘

  • Metric Name: Sum of Squares of Burst Durations in RTP
  • Metric Description: The sum of the squares of burst durations (where individual burst durations are expressed in ms) over in the period of the report.
  • Method of Measurement or Calculation: See Section 3.2, Sum of Squares of Burst Durations definition.
  • Units of Measurement: See Section 3.2, Sum of Squares of Burst Durations definition.
  • Measurement Point(s) with Potential Measurement Domain: See Section 3, 1st paragraph.
  • Measurement Timing: See Section 3, 2nd paragraph for measurement timing and Section 3.2 for Interval Metric flag.
  • Use and Applications: See Section 1.4.
  • Reporting Model: See RFC 3611.

Authors' Addresses ๐Ÿซถ

Alan Clark
Telchemy Incorporated
2905 Premiere Parkway, Suite 280
Duluth, GA  30097
USA

EMail: alan.d.clark@telchemy.com


Sunshine Zhang
Shanghai Research Institute of China Telecom Corporation Limited
No. 1835, South Pudong Road
Shanghai  200122
China

EMail: zhangyx@sttri.com.cn


Jing Zhao
Shanghai Research Institute of China Telecom Corporation Limited
No. 1835, South Pudong Road
Shanghai  200122
China

EMail: zhaojing@sttri.com.cn


Qin Wu (editor)
Huawei
101 Software Avenue, Yuhua District
Nanjing, Jiangsu  210012
China

EMail: sunseawq@huawei.com
๐Ÿ“ฆ where this page comes from