RFC 6360

Conclusion of FYI RFC Sub-Series

πŸ“… published August 2011, from ietf

Conclusion of FYI RFC Sub-Series ✨

Okay bestie, here's the vibe check on this one: RFC 6360 πŸŽ€ It's an Informational doc (not Standards Track, so no pressure πŸ’…), written by R. Housley of Vigil Security, dated August 2011. It obsoletes RFC 1150 and basically puts that one on the Historic shelf 🌸. ISSN: 2070-1721.


Abstract πŸ¦‹

Okay so this doc is literally closing the book on the For Your Information (FYI) sub-series πŸ“š. That sub-series was created by RFC 1150 for the IETF User Services Area, which doesn't exist anymore πŸ’€. The IESG (the folks running the show πŸ‘‘) is NOT adding anything else to this sub-series, and this doc is just the official receipt of that decision 🧾. It also obsoletes RFC 1150 and moves it to Historic. Iconic retirement arc 😭🫢

Status of This Memo πŸ’œ

Quick reminder: this is not an Internet Standards Track spec. It's just published for info 🌈

It's a product of the IETF 🌸, it reflects the community's consensus ✨, it got public review πŸ‘€, and the IESG approved it for publication πŸ”₯. Not every IESG-approved doc is up for any level of Internet Standard, so check Section 2 of RFC 5741 if you're curious πŸ™ˆ

For the current status, errata, or to leave feedback, head to http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6360 πŸ¦‹

Copyright (c) 2011 IETF Trust and the document authors. All rights reserved πŸ’…

This doc is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) as of the publication date. Read them carefully, because they spell out what you can and can't do with it πŸ“œ. Any Code Components pulled from this doc must include the Simplified BSD License text (see Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions), and they come with no warranty, same as the Simplified BSD License says 🌈

1. Background πŸ“š

So the FYI sub-series started with RFC 1150 [RFC1150] back in 1990 πŸ•°οΈ for the IETF User Services Area. That group hasn't met since IETF 53 in March 2001, so it's been a minute 😭. The whole point was to give Internet users a stash of info that might be interesting to a wide range of people 🧚

RFC 1150 [RFC1150] is what introduced FYI. Since then, 38 FYI numbers have been handed out πŸ”’. Plenty of other Informational RFCs exist too, they just aren't part of FYI πŸ’–

You can find the full FYI list on the RFC Editor website [INDEX] 🌐

2. Conclusion of the FYI Sub-Series πŸ‘‘

The IESG is done adding to FYI βœ‹. They'll keep making Informational RFCs, but none of those get an FYI number πŸ™…β€β™€οΈ

Every FYI doc that's already published keeps its number πŸ’œ. Those numbers are still useful reference points, and you can cite a doc by its FYI number πŸŽ€

If a future RFC obsoletes something already in FYI, that new RFC won't get an FYI number either 🫢

3. RFC 1150 Moved to Historic 🌸

This doc moves RFC 1150 [RFC1150] to Historic πŸ•°οΈ. The procedures in RFC 1150 are no longer valid πŸ’€. If anyone wants to add to FYI someday, new procedures can be written to replace this doc ✨

4. Security Considerations πŸ”

No Internet security issues are expected from the actions in this doc 🧚

5. References πŸ“–

5.1. Normative Reference

  • [RFC1150] Malkin, G. and J. Reynolds, "FYI on FYI: Introduction to the FYI Notes", FYI 1, RFC 1150, March 1990.

5.2. Informative Reference

Author's Address πŸ¦‹

Russell Housley πŸ’– Vigil Security, LLC 918 Spring Knoll Drive Herndon, VA 20170 USA EMail: housley@vigilsec.com

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from