RFC 4770
vCard Extensions for Instant Messaging (IM)
RFC 4770: vCard Extensions for Instant Messaging (IM) π
okay bestie, here's the title block tea π«Ά
- Series: Network Working Group
- RFC number: 4770
- Category: Standards Track
- Authors: C. Jennings (Cisco Systems) and J. Reschke, Ed. (greenbytes)
- Date: January 2007
- Obsoletes/Updates: The title block doesn't list anything it obsoletes. Section 2 says this document updates the "text/directory MIME Types" subregistry, so that's the update to know about π¦
Status of This Memo π
ok so this doc is an Internet standards track protocol for the Internet community, and it's asking for discussion and suggestions for improvements πΈ For the current standardization state and status, check the current edition of the "Internet Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1). Distribution of this memo is unlimited β¨
Copyright Notice π
Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2007).
Abstract π
this doc is an extension to vCard that adds support for Instant Messaging (IM) and Presence Protocol (PP) apps π¬ IM and PP are getting seriously popular, and people want to save that contact info in their address books. It lets you put a URI tied to IM or PP inside a vCard, and it's giving very useful π«Ά
Table of Contents ποΈ
1. Overview ........................................................2
2. IANA Considerations .............................................3
3. Formal Grammar ..................................................4
4. Example .........................................................4
5. Security Considerations .........................................4
6. Acknowledgments .................................................4
7. References ......................................................5
7.1. Normative References .......................................5
7.2. Informational References ...................................5
1. Overview π
okay so more and more people use all kinds of IM and PP apps, which means sharing that contact address info along with everything else is a big deal π± RFC 2425 [1] and RFC 2426 [2] define the standard format for this stuff, and it's called vCard. This doc adds a new type to a vCard for representing instant IM and PP URIs π It's super similar to the types we already have for email addresses and phone numbers, so it's not a whole new vibe π§
The type entry that holds this new contact info is an IMPP type β¨ An IMPP entry has a single URI (see RFC 3986 [3]) that points to the address of a service that provides IM, PP, or both. There are also some parameters that give hints about when certain URIs would be appropriate π A vCard can have multiple IMPP entries, but each entry can only contain one URI. Each IMPP entry can contain multiple parameters. Any combination of parameters is valid, although a parameter should occur, at most, once in a given IMPP entry π
The type of URI tells you which protocols might be usable for accessing it, but this doc doesn't define any of the types π For example, a URI type of:
"sip"[5] tells you to use SIP/SIMPLE"xmpp"[6] tells you to use XMPP"irc"tells you to use IRC"ymsgr"tells you to use yahoo"msn"might tell you to use Microsoft messenger"aim"tells you to use AOL"im"[7] or"pres"[8] means a CPIM or CPP gateway should be used
The normative definition of this new vCard type is in Section 2, and an informational ABNF is in Section 3 π₯
2. IANA Considerations π
The required email to define this extension (as defined in RFC 2425 [1]) was sent on October 29, 2004, to the ietf-mime-direct@imc.org mailing list, with the subject "Registration of text/directory MIME type IMPP" π You can find it at http://www.imc.org/ietf-mime-direct/mail-archive/msg00068.html.
This specification updates the "text/directory MIME Types" subregistry in the "text/directory MIME Registrations" registry at http://www.iana.org/assignments/text-directory-registrations with the following info:
Type name: IMPP
Type purpose: To specify the URI for instant messaging and presence
protocol communications with the object the vCard represents.
Type encoding: 8bit
Type value: A single URI. The type of the URI indicates the protocol
that can be used for this contact.
Type special notes: The type may include the type parameter "TYPE" to
specify an intended use for the URI. The TYPE parameter values
include one or more of the following:
o An indication of the type of communication for which this URI is
appropriate. This can be a value of PERSONAL or BUSINESS.
o An indication of the location of a device associated with this
URI. Values can be HOME, WORK, or MOBILE.
o The value PREF indicates this is a preferred address and has the
same semantics as the PREF value in a TEL type.
Additional information can be found in RFC 4770.
Intended usage: COMMON
3. Formal Grammar π
The following ABNF grammar [4] extends the grammar in RFC 2425 [1] (Section 5.8.2) and RFC 2426 [2] (Section 4) π§
;For name="IMPP"
param = impp-param ; Only impp parameters are allowed
value = URI
; URI defined in Section 3 of [3]
impp-param = "TYPE" "=" impp-type *("," impp-type)
impp-type = "PERSONAL" / "BUSINESS" / ; purpose of communications
"HOME" / "WORK" / "MOBILE" /
"PREF" /
iana-token / x-name;
; Values are case insensitive
4. Example π§
Here's what it looks like in practice, and it's so cute π
BEGIN:vCard
VERSION:3.0
FN:Alice Doe
IMPP;TYPE=personal,pref:im:alice@example.com
END:vCard
5. Security Considerations π
ok this part is SERIOUS bestie π
This doesn't add any extra security issues beyond the current vCard spec. But it's worth knowing that lots of people think their presence info is more sensitive than other address info π So any system that stores or transfers vCards needs to really think hard about the privacy issues around this info π
6. Acknowledgments π«Ά
Huge thanks to Brian Carpenter, Lars Eggert, Ted Hardie, Paul Hoffman, Sam Roberts, and Pekka Pessi for their comments π
7. References π
7.1. Normative References
[1] Howes, T., Smith, M., and F. Dawson, "A MIME Content-Type for
Directory Information", RFC 2425, September 1998.
[2] Dawson, F. and T. Howes, "vCard MIME Directory Profile", RFC
2426, September 1998.
[3] Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R., and L. Masinter, "Uniform
Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax", STD 66, RFC 3986,
January 2005.
[4] Crocker, D., Ed. and P. Overell, "Augmented BNF for Syntax
Specifications: ABNF", RFC 4234, October 2005.
7.2. Informational References
[5] Rosenberg, J., Schulzrinne, H., Camarillo, G., Johnston, A.,
Peterson, J., Sparks, R., Handley, M., and E. Schooler, "SIP:
Session Initiation Protocol", RFC 3261, June 2002.
[6] Saint-Andre, P., "Internationalized Resource Identifiers (IRIs)
and Uniform Resource Identifiers (URIs) for the Extensible
Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP)", RFC 4622, July 2006.
[7] Peterson, J., "Common Profile for Instant Messaging (CPIM)", RFC
3860, August 2004.
[8] Peterson, J., "Common Profile for Presence (CPP)", RFC 3859,
August 2004.
Authors' Addresses π‘
Cullen Jennings
Cisco Systems
170 West Tasman Drive
MS: SJC-21/2
San Jose, CA 95134
USA
Phone: +1 408 902-3341
EMail: fluffy@cisco.com
Julian F. Reschke (editor)
greenbytes GmbH
Hafenweg 16
Muenster, NW 48155
Germany
Phone: +49 251 2807760
EMail: julian.reschke@greenbytes.de
Full Copyright Statement Β©οΈ
Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2007).
This doc is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions in BCP 78, and except as set forth there, the authors keep all their rights π
The doc and the info in it are provided on an "AS IS" basis, and the disclaimer goes like this:
THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY, THE IETF TRUST, AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Intellectual Property π¦
The IETF takes no position on the validity or scope of any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to apply to the implementation or use of the technology in this doc, or on whether any license under those rights might be available. It also doesn't say it has made any independent effort to find those rights π Info on the procedures for rights in RFC documents is in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Copies of IPR disclosures sent to the IETF Secretariat, any assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an attempt to get a general license or permission for implementers or users to use those proprietary rights, can be found in the IETF online IPR repository at http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
The IETF invites anyone to tell it about any copyrights, patents, patent applications, or other proprietary rights that might cover technology needed to implement this standard. Send that info to the IETF at ietf-ipr@ietf.org π
Acknowledgement πΈ
Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the Internet Society β¨
π¦ where this page comes from
- ietf: rfc4770 2007-01
- π girlified by claude-haiku-5-5 on : a language model's rewrite of the original, under its terms