RFC 4268
Entity State MIB
RFC 4268: Entity State MIB ✨
Okay bestie, here's the title block tea 🫶. This is RFC 4268, called Entity State MIB, from the Network Working Group. The authors are S. Chisholm (Nortel Networks) and D. Perkins (SNMPinfo). It's a Standards Track document, dated November 2005. The title block doesn't list anything it obsoletes or updates 💅.
Status of This Memo
This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005).
Abstract
This memo defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB) for use with network management protocols in the Internet community. In particular, it describes extensions to the Entity MIB to provide information about the state of physical entities.
In addition, this memo defines a set of Textual Conventions to represent various states of an entity. The intent is that these Textual Conventions will be imported and used in MIB modules that would otherwise define their own representations 🎀.
Table of Contents
1. The Internet-Standard Management Framework ......................2
2. Entity State ....................................................2
2.1. Hierarchical State Management ..............................3
2.2. Entity Redundancy ..........................................3
2.3. Physical Entity Users ......................................3
2.4. Physical Class Behavior ....................................4
3. Relation to Other MIBs ..........................................4
3.1. Relation to the Interfaces MIB .............................4
3.2. Relation to Alarm MIB ......................................5
3.3. Relation to Bridge MIB .....................................5
3.4. Relation to the Host Resources MIB .........................5
4. Textual Conventions .............................................6
5. Definitions .................................................... 9
6. Security Considerations ........................................16
7. Acknowledgements ...............................................17
8. References .....................................................17
8.1. Normative References ......................................17
8.2. Informative References ....................................181. The Internet-Standard Management Framework
For a detailed overview of the documents that describe the current Internet-Standard Management Framework, please refer to section 7 of RFC 3410 [RFC3410].
Managed objects are accessed via a virtual information store, termed the Management Information Base or MIB. MIB objects are generally accessed through the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP). Objects in the MIB are defined using the mechanisms defined in the Structure of Management Information (SMI). This memo specifies a MIB module that is compliant to the SMIv2, which is described in STD 58, RFC 2578 [RFC2578], STD 58, RFC 2579 [RFC2579] and STD 58, RFC 2580 [RFC2580] ✨.
2. Entity State
Okay so the goal in adding state objects to the Entity MIB [RFC4133] is to define a useful subset of the possible state attributes that could be tracked for a given entity. These need to fit into state models like the ones used in the Interfaces MIB [RFC2863], and they should also leverage existing, well-deployed models 🧚. The entStateTable contains state objects that are a subset of the popular ISO/OSI states that are also defined in ITU's X.731 specification [X.731]. Objects are defined to capture administrative, operational, and usage states. On top of that, there are further state objects that give more info for these three basic states 💜.
Administrative state indicates permission to use or prohibition against using the entity, and it's imposed through the management services 🔥.
Operational state indicates whether or not the entity is physically installed and working. Note that unlike the ifOperStatus [RFC2863], this operational state is independent of the administrative state 👑.
Usage state indicates whether or not the entity is in use at a specific instance, and if so, whether or not it currently has spare capacity to serve additional users. In the context of this MIB, the usage state refers to the ability of an entity to service other entities within its containment hierarchy 🌸.
Alarm state indicates whether or not there are any alarms active against the entity. In addition to those alarm states defined in X.731 [X.731], warning and indeterminate status are also defined to provide a more complete mapping to the Alarm MIB [RFC3877] 🦋.
Standby state indicates whether the entity is currently running as hot standby or cold standby, or is currently providing service 🍓.
The terms "state" and "status" are used interchangeably in this memo 💅.
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119]. Yes, these are the official rule words, so they stay in caps 🙈.
2.1. Hierarchical State Management
Physical entities exist within a containment hierarchy. Physical containment is defined by the entPhysicalContainedIn object [RFC4133]. This raises some interesting issues not addressed in existing work on state management 🌈.
There are two types of state for an entity:
- The state of the entity independent of the states of its parents and children in its containment hierarchy. This is often referred to as raw state.
- The state of the entity, as it may be influenced by the state of its parents and children. This is often referred to as computed state.
All state objects in this memo are raw state ✨.
2.2. Entity Redundancy
While this memo is not attempting to address the entire problem space around redundancy, the entStateStandby object provides an important piece of state information for entities 🫶. It helps identify which pieces of redundant equipment are currently providing service, and which are waiting in either hot or cold standby mode 💖.
2.3. Physical Entity Users
There are three ways to define the 'user' of a physical entity
- Direct containment in physical hierarchy
- Anywhere in physical hierarchy
- As defined by a means outside the scope of this MIB. This could include logical interfaces that could run on a port, software that could run on a module, etc.
Administrative, operational, alarm, and standby state use all three definitions of 'user'. Usage state supports only the concept of direct containment, to simplify implementations of this object 🧚.
2.4. Physical Class Behavior
This MIB makes no effort to standardize the behaviors and characteristics of the various physical classes [RFC4133], but rather how this information is reported. In looking at real-world products, items within the same physical class vary substantially 🙃. The MIB has therefore provided guidance on how to support objects where a particular instance of a physical class cannot support part or all of a particular state 🎀.
3. Relation to Other MIBs
3.1. Relation to the Interfaces MIB
The Interfaces MIB [RFC2863] defines the ifAdminStatus object, which has states of up, down, and testing, and the ifOperStatus object, which has states of up, down, testing, unknown, dormant, notPresent, and lowerLayerDown.
An ifAdminStatus of 'up' is equivalent to setting the entStateAdmin object to 'unlocked'. An ifAdminStatus of 'down' is equivalent to setting the entStateAdmin object to either 'locked' or 'shuttingDown', depending on a system's interpretation of 'down'.
An ifOperStatus of 'up' is equivalent to an entStateOper value of 'enabled'. An ifOperStatus of 'down' due to operational failure is equivalent to an entStateOper value of 'disabled'. An ifOperStatus of 'down' due to being administratively disabled is equivalent to an entStateAdmin value of 'locked' and an entStateOper value of either 'enabled' or 'disabled', depending on whether there are any known issues that would prevent the entity from becoming operational when its entStateAdmin is set to 'unlocked'. An ifOperStatus of 'unknown' is equivalent to an entStateOper value of 'unknown'.
The ifOperStatus values of 'testing' and 'dormant' are not explicitly supported by this MIB, but the state objects will be able to reflect other aspects of the entities' administrative and operational state. The ifOperStatus values of 'notPresent' and 'lowerLayerDown' are in some ways computed states, and so are therefore not supported in this MIB. They can, though, be computed by examining the states of entities within this object's containment hierarchy and other available related states 🌸.
3.2. Relation to Alarm MIB
The entStateAlarm object indicates whether or not there are any active alarms against this entity. If there are active alarms, then the alarmActiveTable in the Alarm MIB [RFC3877] should be searched for rows whose alarmActiveResourceId matches this entPhysicalIndex.
Alternatively, if the alarmActiveTable is queried first and an active alarm with a value of alarmActiveResourceId that matches this entPhysicalIndex is found, then entStateAlarm can be used to quickly determine if there are additional active alarms with a different severity against this physical entity 🔥.
3.3 Relation to Bridge MIB
For entities of physical type of 'port' that support the dot1dStpPortEnable object in the Bridge MIB [RFC4188], a value of 'enabled' is equivalent to setting the entStateAdmin object to 'unlocked'. Setting dot1dStpPortEnable to 'disabled' is equivalent to setting the entStateAdmin object to 'locked' 🍓.
3.4 Relation to the Host Resources MIB
The hrDeviceStatus object in the Host Resources MIB [RFC2790] provides an operational state for devices. For entities that logically correspond to the concept of a device, a value of 'unknown' for hrDeviceStatus corresponds to an entStateOper value of 'unknown'. A value of 'running' corresponds to an entStateOper value of 'enabled'. A value of 'warning' also corresponds to an entStateOper value of 'enabled', but with appropriate bits set in the entStateAlarm object to indicate the alarms corresponding to the unusual error condition detected. A value of 'testing' or 'down' is equivalent to an entStateOper value of 'disabled' 💜.
4. Textual Conventions 🎀
okay bestie, this section is basically the dictionary for the whole MIB 📖. Textual conventions are the reusable state types, so every object that talks about admin, operational, usage, alarm, or standby state uses the same vocab. The module below is called ENTITY-STATE-TC-MIB, and it's giving tidy, consistent, and very on brand ✨.
ENTITY-STATE-TC-MIB DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN
IMPORTS
MODULE-IDENTITY, mib-2 FROM SNMPv2-SMI
TEXTUAL-CONVENTION FROM SNMPv2-TC;
entityStateTc MODULE-IDENTITY
LAST-UPDATED "200511220000Z"
ORGANIZATION "IETF Entity MIB Working Group"
CONTACT-INFO
"General Discussion: entmib@ietf.org
To Subscribe:
http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib
http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/entmib-charter.html
Sharon Chisholm
Nortel Networks
PO Box 3511 Station C
Ottawa, Ont. K1Y 4H7
Canada
schishol@nortel.com
David T. Perkins
548 Qualbrook Ct
San Jose, CA 95110
USA
Phone: 408 394-8702
dperkins@snmpinfo.com"
DESCRIPTION
"This MIB defines state textual conventions.
Copyright (C) The Internet Society 2005. This version
of this MIB module is part of RFC 4268; see the RFC
itself for full legal notices."
REVISION "200511220000Z"
DESCRIPTION
"Initial version, published as RFC 4268."
::= { mib-2 130 }
EntityAdminState ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
" Represents the various possible administrative states.
A value of 'locked' means the resource is administratively
prohibited from use. A value of 'shuttingDown' means that
usage is administratively limited to current instances of
use. A value of 'unlocked' means the resource is not
administratively prohibited from use. A value of
'unknown' means that this resource is unable to
report administrative state."
SYNTAX INTEGER
{
unknown (1),
locked (2),
shuttingDown (3),
unlocked (4)
}
EntityOperState ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
" Represents the possible values of operational states.
A value of 'disabled' means the resource is totally
inoperable. A value of 'enabled' means the resource
is partially or fully operable. A value of 'testing'
means the resource is currently being tested
and cannot therefore report whether it is operational
or not. A value of 'unknown' means that this
resource is unable to report operational state."
SYNTAX INTEGER
{
unknown (1),
disabled (2),
enabled (3),
testing (4)
}
EntityUsageState ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
" Represents the possible values of usage states.
A value of 'idle' means the resource is servicing no
users. A value of 'active' means the resource is
currently in use and it has sufficient spare capacity
to provide for additional users. A value of 'busy'
means the resource is currently in use, but it
currently has no spare capacity to provide for
additional users. A value of 'unknown' means
that this resource is unable to report usage state."
SYNTAX INTEGER
{
unknown (1),
idle (2),
active (3),
busy (4)
}
EntityAlarmStatus ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
" Represents the possible values of alarm status.
An Alarm [RFC3877] is a persistent indication
of an error or warning condition.
When no bits of this attribute are set, then no active
alarms are known against this entity and it is not under
repair.
When the 'value of underRepair' is set, the resource is
currently being repaired, which, depending on the
implementation, may make the other values in this bit
string not meaningful.
When the value of 'critical' is set, one or more critical
alarms are active against the resource. When the value
of 'major' is set, one or more major alarms are active
against the resource. When the value of 'minor' is set,
one or more minor alarms are active against the resource.
When the value of 'warning' is set, one or more warning
alarms are active against the resource. When the value
of 'indeterminate' is set, one or more alarms of whose
perceived severity cannot be determined are active
against this resource.
A value of 'unknown' means that this resource is
unable to report alarm state."
SYNTAX BITS
{
unknown (0),
underRepair (1),
critical(2),
major(3),
minor(4),
-- The following are not defined in X.733
warning (5),
indeterminate (6)
}
EntityStandbyStatus ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
" Represents the possible values of standby status.
A value of 'hotStandby' means the resource is not
providing service, but it will be immediately able to
take over the role of the resource to be backed up,
without the need for initialization activity, and will
contain the same information as the resource to be
backed up. A value of 'coldStandy' means that the
resource is to back up another resource, but will not
be immediately able to take over the role of a resource
to be backed up, and will require some initialization
activity. A value of 'providingService' means the
resource is providing service. A value of
'unknown' means that this resource is unable to
report standby state."
SYNTAX INTEGER
{
unknown (1),
hotStandby (2),
coldStandby (3),
providingService (4)
}
END5. Definitions 💅
okay now we're in the actual MIB 🧚, and this is where the state objects live. The module is ENTITY-STATE-MIB, it pulls its types from the textual conventions we just looked at, and it's a state extension to the Entity MIB. It's got the same contact info as the module above, plus its own identity under mib-2 131 💜.
ENTITY-STATE-MIB DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN
IMPORTS
MODULE-IDENTITY, OBJECT-TYPE, NOTIFICATION-TYPE, mib-2
FROM SNMPv2-SMI
DateAndTime
FROM SNMPv2-TC
MODULE-COMPLIANCE, OBJECT-GROUP, NOTIFICATION-GROUP
FROM SNMPv2-CONF
entPhysicalIndex
FROM ENTITY-MIB
EntityAdminState, EntityOperState, EntityUsageState,
EntityAlarmStatus, EntityStandbyStatus
FROM ENTITY-STATE-TC-MIB;
entityStateMIB MODULE-IDENTITY
LAST-UPDATED "200511220000Z"
ORGANIZATION "IETF Entity MIB Working Group"
CONTACT-INFO
" General Discussion: entmib@ietf.org
To Subscribe:
http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib
http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/entmib-charter.html
Sharon Chisholm
Nortel Networks
PO Box 3511 Station C
Ottawa, Ont. K1Y 4H7
Canada
schishol@nortel.com
David T. Perkins
548 Qualbrook Ct
San Jose, CA 95110
USA
Phone: 408 394-8702
dperkins@snmpinfo.com
"
DESCRIPTION
"This MIB defines a state extension to the Entity MIB.
Copyright (C) The Internet Society 2005. This version
of this MIB module is part of RFC 4268; see the RFC
itself for full legal notices."
REVISION "200511220000Z"
DESCRIPTION
"Initial version, published as RFC 4268."
::= { mib-2 131 }
-- Entity State Objects
entStateObjects OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { entityStateMIB 1 }
entStateTable OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF EntStateEntry
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"A table of information about state/status of entities.
This is a sparse augment of the entPhysicalTable. Entries
appear in this table for values of
entPhysicalClass [RFC4133] that in this implementation
are able to report any of the state or status stored in
this table.
"
::= { entStateObjects 1 }
entStateEntry OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX EntStateEntry
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"State information about this physical entity."
INDEX { entPhysicalIndex }
::= { entStateTable 1 }
EntStateEntry ::= SEQUENCE {
entStateLastChanged DateAndTime,
entStateAdmin EntityAdminState,
entStateOper EntityOperState,
entStateUsage EntityUsageState,
entStateAlarm EntityAlarmStatus,
entStateStandby EntityStandbyStatus
}
entStateLastChanged OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX DateAndTime
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The value of this object is the date and
time when the value of any of entStateAdmin,
entStateOper, entStateUsage, entStateAlarm,
or entStateStandby changed for this entity.
If there has been no change since
the last re-initialization of the local system,
this object contains the date and time of
local system initialization. If there has been
no change since the entity was added to the
local system, this object contains the date and
time of the insertion."
::= { entStateEntry 1 }
entStateAdmin OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX EntityAdminState
MAX-ACCESS read-write
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The administrative state for this entity.
This object refers to an entities administrative
permission to service both other entities within
its containment hierarchy as well other users of
its services defined by means outside the scope
of this MIB.
Setting this object to 'notSupported' will result
in an 'inconsistentValue' error. For entities that
do not support administrative state, all set
operations will result in an 'inconsistentValue'
error.
Some physical entities exhibit only a subset of the
remaining administrative state values. Some entities
cannot be locked, and hence this object exhibits only
the 'unlocked' state. Other entities cannot be shutdown
gracefully, and hence this object does not exhibit the
'shuttingDown' state. A value of 'inconsistentValue'
will be returned if attempts are made to set this
object to values not supported by its administrative
model."
::= { entStateEntry 2 }entStateOper OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX EntityOperState
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The operational state for this entity.
Note that unlike the state model used within the
Interfaces MIB [RFC2863], this object does not follow
the administrative state. An administrative state of
down does not predict an operational state
of disabled.
A value of 'testing' means that entity currently being
tested and cannot therefore report whether it is
operational or not.
A value of 'disabled' means that an entity is totally
inoperable and unable to provide service both to entities
within its containment hierarchy, or to other receivers
of its service as defined in ways outside the scope of
this MIB.
A value of 'enabled' means that an entity is fully or
partially operable and able to provide service both to
entities within its containment hierarchy, or to other
receivers of its service as defined in ways outside the
scope of this MIB.
Note that some implementations may not be able to
accurately report entStateOper while the
entStateAdmin object has a value other than 'unlocked'.
In these cases, this object MUST have a value
of 'unknown'."
::= { entStateEntry 3 }
entStateUsage OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX EntityUsageState
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The usage state for this entity.
This object refers to an entity's ability to service more
physical entities in a containment hierarchy. A value
of 'idle' means this entity is able to contain other
entities but that no other entity is currently
contained within this entity.
A value of 'active' means that at least one entity is
contained within this entity, but that it could handle
more. A value of 'busy' means that the entity is unable
to handle any additional entities being contained in it.
Some entities will exhibit only a subset of the
usage state values. Entities that are unable to ever
service any entities within a containment hierarchy will
always have a usage state of 'busy'. Some entities will
only ever be able to support one entity within its
containment hierarchy and will therefore only exhibit
values of 'idle' and 'busy'."
::= { entStateEntry 4 }
entStateAlarm OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX EntityAlarmStatus
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The alarm status for this entity. It does not include
the alarms raised on child components within its
containment hierarchy.
A value of 'unknown' means that this entity is
unable to report alarm state. Note that this differs
from 'indeterminate', which means that alarm state
is supported and there are alarms against this entity,
but the severity of some of the alarms is not known.
If no bits are set, then this entity supports reporting
of alarms, but there are currently no active alarms
against this entity."
::= { entStateEntry 5 }
entStateStandby OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX EntityStandbyStatus
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The standby status for this entity.
Some entities will exhibit only a subset of the
remaining standby state values. If this entity
cannot operate in a standby role, the value of this
object will always be 'providingService'."
::= { entStateEntry 6 }
-- Notifications
entStateNotifications OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { entityStateMIB 0 }
entStateOperEnabled NOTIFICATION-TYPE
OBJECTS { entStateAdmin,
entStateAlarm
}
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"An entStateOperEnabled notification signifies that the
SNMP entity, acting in an agent role, has detected that
the entStateOper object for one of its entities has
transitioned into the 'enabled' state.
The entity this notification refers can be identified by
extracting the entPhysicalIndex from one of the
variable bindings. The entStateAdmin and entStateAlarm
varbinds may be examined to find out additional
information on the administrative state at the time of
the operation state change as well as to find out whether
there were any known alarms against the entity at that
time that may explain why the physical entity has become
operationally disabled."
::= { entStateNotifications 1 }
entStateOperDisabled NOTIFICATION-TYPE
OBJECTS { entStateAdmin,
entStateAlarm }
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"An entStateOperDisabled notification signifies that the
SNMP entity, acting in an agent role, has detected that
the entStateOper object for one of its entities has
transitioned into the 'disabled' state.
The entity this notification refers can be identified by
extracting the entPhysicalIndex from one of the
variable bindings. The entStateAdmin and entStateAlarm
varbinds may be examined to find out additional
information on the administrative state at the time of
the operation state change as well as to find out whether
there were any known alarms against the entity at that
time that may affect the physical entity's
ability to stay operationally enabled."
::= { entStateNotifications 2 }
-- Conformance and Compliance
entStateConformance OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { entityStateMIB 2 }
entStateCompliances OBJECT IDENTIFIER
::= { entStateConformance 1 }
entStateCompliance MODULE-COMPLIANCE
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The compliance statement for systems supporting
the Entity State MIB."
MODULE -- this module
MANDATORY-GROUPS {
entStateGroup
}
GROUP entStateNotificationsGroup
DESCRIPTION
"This group is optional."
OBJECT entStateAdmin
MIN-ACCESS read-only
DESCRIPTION
"Write access is not required."
::= { entStateCompliances 1 }
entStateGroups OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { entStateConformance 2 }
entStateGroup OBJECT-GROUP
OBJECTS {
entStateLastChanged,
entStateAdmin,
entStateOper,
entStateUsage,
entStateAlarm,
entStateStandby
}
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"Standard Entity State group."
::= { entStateGroups 1}
entStateNotificationsGroup NOTIFICATION-GROUP
NOTIFICATIONS {
entStateOperEnabled,
entStateOperDisabled
}
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"Standard Entity State Notification group."
::= { entStateGroups 2}
END6. Security Considerations 🔐💅
okay this one is SO important bestie 🥹 the ENTITY-STATE-TC-MIB we talked about back in section 4 doesn't define any management objects at all. It just gives other MIB modules a set of textual conventions they can use to define their own objects. So meaningful security considerations can only be written in the MIB modules that actually define management objects, and the ENTITY-STATE-TC-MIB has therefore no impact on the security of the Internet 🫶
now the ENTITY-STATE-MIB from section 5 is where it gets spicy 🌶️ it defines one management object, entStateAdmin, with a MAX-ACCESS clause of read-write. That means it can be seen as sensitive or vulnerable in some network environments, and supporting SET operations in a non-secure environment without proper protection can have a negative effect on network operations 😭
Setting entStateAdmin to 'locked' or 'shuttingDown' can cause disruption of services, and that can range from stuff running on a single port all the way to stuff running on an entire device, depending on the type of entity. Access to this object should be properly protected. No cap, this one is serious 🚨
also, access to the objects in this MIB lets someone figure out what the active and standby resources in a network are 👀 and that info could be used to optimize attacks on networks. So even read-only access to this MIB should be properly protected 🛡️
SNMP versions before SNMPv3 did not include adequate security. Even if the network itself is secure (for example by using IPsec), there is still no control over who on that secure network gets to GET/SET (read/change/create/delete) the objects in this MIB module. Literally the lack of control is giving 💀
so what should you do instead? It is RECOMMENDED that implementers consider the security features provided by the SNMPv3 framework (see [RFC3410], section 8), including full support for the SNMPv3 cryptographic mechanisms (for authentication and privacy) ✨
and deploying SNMP versions prior to SNMPv3 is NOT RECOMMENDED 🙅♀️ instead, it is RECOMMENDED to deploy SNMPv3 and enable cryptographic security. It is then a customer/operator responsibility to make sure the SNMP entity giving access to an instance of this MIB module is properly configured, so that access to the objects is only given to principals (entities) that have legitimate rights to indeed GET or SET (change/create/delete) them. main character energy for the ops team 👑
7. Acknowledgements 🙏🧚
this one's short and sweet 🍓 this document came out of the Entity MIB Working Group, so huge thanks to them 💜
8. References 📚
8.1. Normative References
- [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
- [RFC2578] McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., Schoenwaelder, J., Case, J., Rose, M., and S. Waldbusser, "Structure of Management Information Version 2 (SMIv2)", STD 58, RFC 2578, April 1999.
- [RFC2579] McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., Schoenwaelder, J., Case, J., Rose, M., and S. Waldbusser, "Textual Conventions for SMIv2", STD 58, RFC 2579, April 1999.
- [RFC2580] McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., Schoenwaelder, J., Case, J., Rose, M., and S. Waldbusser, "Conformance Statements for SMIv2", STD 58, RFC 2580, April 1999.
- [RFC4133] Bierman, A. and K. McCloghrie, "Entity MIB (Version 3)", RFC 4133, August 2005.
8.2. Informative References 📚
okay so these are the extra reads for when you want the deep dive 🤓 bestie, here's the squad:
[RFC2790]Waldbusser, S. and P. Grillo, "Host Resources MIB", RFC 2790, March 2000.[RFC2863]McCloghrie, K. and F. Kastenholz, "The Interfaces Group MIB using SMIv2", RFC 2863, June 2000.[RFC3410]Case, J., Mundy, R., Partain, D., and B. Stewart, "Introduction and Applicability Statements for Internet-Standard Management Framework", RFC 3410, December 2002.[RFC3877]Chisholm, S. and D. Romascanu, "Alarm Management Information Base (MIB)", RFC 3877, September 2004.[RFC4188]Norseth, K. and E. Bell, "Definitions of Managed Objects for Bridges", RFC 4188, September 2005.[X.731]ITU Recommendation X.731, "Information Technology - Open Systems Interconnection - System Management: State Management Function", 1992.
Authors' Addresses 💌
These are the girlies who wrote it 🎀
Sharon Chisholm
Nortel Networks
PO Box 3511, Station C
Ottawa, Ontario, K1Y 4H7
Canada
EMail: schishol@nortel.comDavid T. Perkins
548 Qualbrook Ct
San Jose, CA 95110
USA
Phone: 408 394-8702
EMail: dperkins@snmpinfo.comFull Copyright Statement ⚖️
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005). 🌈
This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights.
This document and the information contained herein are provided on an "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Intellectual Property 🔐
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in this document or the extent to which any license under such rights might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at ietf-ipr@ietf.org.
Acknowledgement 🫶
Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the Internet Society. 💜
📦 where this page comes from
- ietf: rfc4268 2005-12
- 💖 girlified by claude-haiku-5-5 on : a language model's rewrite of the original, under its terms